journal article·2011-05

Alkaline activation of Al 7075-T6 for deposition of cerium-based conversion coatings

Simon Joshi, William G. Fahrenholtz, Matthew J. O'Keefe

Surface and Coatings Technology· Volume 205· Issue 17-18
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The effect of alkaline activation on the morphology and corrosion performance of cerium-based conversion coatings deposited on Al7075-T6 was studied. Prior to coating deposition, alloy panels were activated in aqueous solutions containing Na 2 CO 3 or NaOH. Scanning electron microscopy indicated that as-deposited coatings on Na 2 CO 3 activated substrates had fewer surface cracks, fewer craters, and were more uniform than those activated with NaOH. Post-treatment of coatings in a NaH 2 PO 4 solution improved the corrosion resistance and reduced the number of visible cracks; however, some regions still exhibited large cracks (> 0.5 μm wide). Subsurface crevices were found under craters and regions with large cracks, which were fewer for coatings on Na 2 CO 3 activated substrates compared to coatings on NaOH activated substrates. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy testing showed that post-treated coatings on Na 2 CO 3 activated panels had total impedance of ~ 200 kΩ cm 2 compared to ~ 50–100 kΩ cm 2 for coatings on NaOH activated panels. Alkaline activation promoted deposition of corrosion resistant coatings with Na 2 CO 3 activation exhibiting the best corrosion resistance and the least amount of subsurface damage.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Electrodeposition and Electroless Coatings

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. Hatch · 1984
2. Davis · 1999
3. Jones · 1996
4. Fahrenholtz · J. Surf. Coat. Tech. · 2002 · 155 · 20810.1016/S0257-8972(02)00062-2 ↗
5. Dixit · J. Mater Sci. Eng. A · 2008 · 478 · 16310.1016/j.msea.2007.05.116 ↗
6. Starink · Acta Mater. · 2003 · 51 · 513110.1016/S1359-6454(03)00363-X ↗
7. Nie · J. Phase Equilibria · 1998 · 19 · 54310.1361/105497198770341734 ↗
8. Ortiz · J. Mater. Eng. Perform. · 2007 · 16 · 51510.1007/s11665-007-9074-7 ↗
9. Altenpohl · 1998
10. Campestrini · J. Electrochim. Acta · 2001 · 46 · 255310.1016/S0013-4686(01)00475-3 ↗
11. Kulinich · J. App. Surf. Sci. · 2007 · 253 · 314410.1016/j.apsusc.2006.07.004 ↗
12. Zhao · J. Surf. Coat. Tech. · 2001 · 140 · 5110.1016/S0257-8972(01)01003-9 ↗
13. Cohen · Corrosion · 1995 · 51 · 7110.5006/1.3293580 ↗
14. Twite · Prog. Org. Coat. · 1998 · 33 · 9110.1016/S0300-9440(98)00015-0 ↗
15. Waldrop · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1998 · 145 · L1110.1149/1.1838199 ↗
16. Joshi · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2011 · 257 · 185910.1016/j.apsusc.2010.08.126 ↗
17. Hinton · Mater. Forum · 1984 · 7 · 211
18. L. Wilson, B.W.R. Hinton, A Method of Forming a Corrosion Resistant Coating, International Patent WO 88/06639.
19. Hinton · Mater. Forum · 1986 · 9 · 162
20. Hinton · J. Alloys Compd. · 1992 · 180 · 1510.1016/0925-8388(92)90359-H ↗
21. Hinton · Mater. Aust. · 1987 · 19 · 18
22. Hughes · Surf. Interf. Analy. · 1995 · 23 · 54010.1002/sia.740230714 ↗
23. Hinton · in: Proceedings of the Conference on Aluminium Surface Science and Technology, Antwerp, Belgium, ATB Metallurgie · 1997 · 165
24. Treu · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2010 · 157 · C28210.1149/1.3454236 ↗
25. Pinc · J. Surf. Coat. Tech. · 2010 · 204 · 409510.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.05.039 ↗
26. Geng · J. App. Electrochem. · 2010 · 40 · 55110.1007/s10800-009-0027-8 ↗
27. Pinc · J. App. Surf. Sci. · 2009 · 255 · 406110.1016/j.apsusc.2008.10.110 ↗
28. Scholes · App. Surf. Sci. · 2006 · 253 · 177010.1016/j.apsusc.2006.03.010 ↗
29. Hayes · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2002 · 149 · C62310.1149/1.1516775 ↗
30. de Frutos · J. Surf. Coat. Tech. · 2008 · 202 · 379710.1016/j.surfcoat.2008.01.027 ↗
31. Rangel · J. Surf. Coat. Tech. · 2008 · 202 · 339610.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.12.017 ↗
32. Brunelli · J. Mater. and Corr. · 2009 · 60 · 51410.1002/maco.200805096 ↗
33. Hughes · J. Surf. Coat. Technol. · 2009 · 203 · 292710.1016/j.surfcoat.2009.03.022 ↗
34. Heller · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2009 · 156 · C40010.1149/1.3224005 ↗
35. Yasakau · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2006 · 110 · 551510.1021/jp0560664 ↗
36. Zoltowski · Chem. · 1984 · 178 · 11
37. Dabala · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2001 · 172 · 31210.1016/S0169-4332(00)00873-4 ↗
38. Campestrini · Surf. Coat. Technol. · 2004 · 176 · 36510.1016/S0257-8972(03)00743-6 ↗
39. Decroly · Surf. Coat. Technol. · 2005 · 194 · 110.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.05.012 ↗
40. Yu · J. Allo. Comp. · 2004 · 364 · 19310.1016/S0925-8388(03)00502-4 ↗
41. Wang · Corros. · 2004 · 237–243
42. Dygas · J. Electrochim. Acta · 1999 · 44 · 416310.1016/S0013-4686(99)00131-0 ↗
43. Orazem · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2006 · 153 · B12910.1149/1.2168377 ↗
44. Cottis · 1999
45. Macdonald · 1987
46. Hsu · Corrosion · 2001 · 57 · 74710.5006/1.3280607 ↗
47. Hirschorn · J. Electrochim. Acta. · 2010 · 55 · 621810.1016/j.electacta.2009.10.065 ↗
48. Miller · 1993
49. Siegel · 1988
50. Joshi · ECS Trans. · 2010 · 28 · 21710.1149/1.3496433 ↗
51. Pinc · Surf. Coat. Technol. · 2009 · 203 · 353310.1016/j.surfcoat.2009.05.019 ↗
52. Treu · ECS Trans. · 2009 · 19 · 10110.1149/1.3259802 ↗