journal article·2026-02-01

High-speed observation of melt pool-vapor interactions in long-pulsed laser ablation of metals

Andreas Schkutow, Johanna Breit, Thomas Frick

Journal of Laser Applications· Volume 38· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Laser ablation of metals can be performed using cost-effective and efficient continuous wave fiber lasers using the fast power modulation capabilities of these beam sources. Single-pulse laser ablation of steel with pulse durations in the microsecond to millisecond time scale is observed using a high-speed camera setup to investigate the dynamic interactions between the generated melt pool and the vapor phase. Distinct processing regimes were identified depending on the pulse duration, temporal pulse shape, and power density. Pulse durations in the microsecond range can lead to beneficial processing conditions for ablation processes. In this regime, phase explosion and dynamic melt expulsion by melt uplift and coaxial droplet ejection due to the rapid drop in vapor pressure after the laser pulses were observed as desirable mechanisms, leading to effective material removal and high processing quality with little melt adhesion.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Laser Material Processing Techniques · Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma · Laser-Ablation Synthesis of Nanoparticles

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute for Chemistry, Materials and Product Development, Technische Hochschule Nürnberg Georg Simon Ohm , Kesslerplatz 12, Nürnberg 90489,

Funding

Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. · 1997 · 33 · 170610.1109/3.631270 ↗
2. J. Mater. Sci. · 2024 · 59 · 181910.1007/s10853-023-09319-0 ↗
3. Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2005 · 248 · 29910.1016/j.apsusc.2005.03.061 ↗
4. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys · 2013 · 15 · 302210.1039/C2CP90132C ↗
5. Materials · 2021 · 14 · 333110.3390/ma14123331 ↗
6. Sugioka · 2020 · 310.1007/978-3-319-69537-2 ↗
7. Sugioka · 2020 · 8310.1007/978-3-319-69537-2 ↗
8. Proc. SPIE · 2012 · 8243 · 82430710.1117/12.908583 ↗
9. Proc. SPIE · 2024 · 13005 · 130050310.1117/12.3016900 ↗
10. Adv. Opt. Technol. · 2021 · 10 · 23910.1515/aot-2021-0038 ↗
11. nLIGHT, Inc. · 2019
12. J. Laser Micro/Nanoeng. · 2023 · 18 · 10510.2961/jlmn.2023.02.2009 ↗
13. Opt. Laser Technol. · 2017 · 94 · 11910.1016/j.optlastec.2017.03.021 ↗
14. Opt. Commun. · 2002 · 210 · 31910.1016/S0030-4018(02)01807-2 ↗
15. Procedia CIRP · 2022 · 111 · 73210.1016/j.procir.2022.08.077 ↗
16. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 44 · 43540210.1088/0022-3727/44/43/435402 ↗
17. Addit. Manuf. · 2022 · 60 · 10323910.1016/j.addma.2022.103239 ↗
18. Nat. Commun. · 2019 · 10 · 198710.1038/s41467-019-10009-2 ↗
19. J. Laser Appl. · 2011 · 23 · 03200510.2351/1.3597830 ↗
20. Materials · 2024 · 17 · 474110.3390/ma17194741 ↗
21. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 42 · 15550310.1088/0022-3727/42/15/155503 ↗
22. J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 114 · 08310810.1063/1.4818513 ↗
23. J. Mater. Process. Technol. · 2018 · 262 · 13110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.06.038 ↗