Ray tracing of optical aids: Implications for ocular risk
Source abstract
Abstract
How do ocular aids impact retinal risk when viewing divergent sources? We present ray tracing calculations for ocular aids used in several common configurations and compare risk relative to an unaided eye. Retinal irradiance values for sources of different subtence and divergence were calculated for ocular aids of different magnifying power. The data show the stark difference between point sources, like lasers, and extended sources, such as light emitting diodes (LEDs) and lamps. Arguing from fundamental physiological phenomena we compare the relative ocular risks of various sources under a range of viewing conditions and compare these calculations with standards proposed to classify such different sources. We conclude that, if point sources are correctly classified, then extended sources, such as LEDs, are overclassified by the IEC 825-1/CENELEC.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ocular and Laser Science Research · Visual perception and processing mechanisms · Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, P.O. Box 218, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598
References (5)
Show source-provided references
1. Effect of monochromatic aberrations on photorefractive patterns10.1364/JOSAA.12.001637 ↗
2. Subjective Measurement of High-Order Aberrations of the Eye10.1126/science.959814 ↗
3. Measurement of Monochromatic Ocular Aberrations of Human Eyes as a Function of Accommodation by the Howland Aberroscope Technique10.1016/0042-6989(94)00139-D ↗
4. Spot-size dependence of laser dosimetry
5. Extended sources-concepts and potential hazards10.1016/0030-3992(95)93952-N ↗