Grain–bulk versus grain–boundary sensitivities to redox reaction in yttria-doped ceria ceramics viewed from impedance spectroscopy
Source abstract
Abstract
Yttria-doped ceria ceramics were prepared and reduced in an oxygen-deficient (argon) ambient. Electrical characterization through impedance spectroscopy revealed ionic-type conduction processes in as-sintered samples, with grain–bulk and grain–boundary activation energies (H) of about 1.00 eV and 1.05 eV, respectively. Electrical results from the reduced materials showed a predominant electronic-type, relatively high conductivity for the grains (H=0.52 eV), in contrast to a still ionic-like, relatively poor conductivity for the grain boundaries (H=0.95 eV). With the support of the results processed after re-oxidizing the materials in air combined with information from literature, this apparently contradictory behavior is discussed in terms of electron trapping at (Ce3+: $V_{\text{O}..}$ )-type defect complexes. The overall work strongly supports the idea that surfaces (e.g., grain boundaries) in polycrystalline ceria are indeed much more sensitive to redox interactions than lattice.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. E.C. Subbarao, H.S. Maiti, Solid State Ionics 11, 317 (1984)10.1016/0167-2738(84)90024-9 ↗
2. N.Q. Minh, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 76, 563 (1993)10.1111/j.1151-2916.1993.tb03645.x ↗
3. Y.-M. Chiang, E.B. Lavik, I. Kosacki, H. L Tuller, J.Y. Ying, Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 185 (1996)10.1063/1.117366 ↗
4. Y.-M. Chiang, E.B. Lavik, I. Kosacki, H.L. Tuller, J.Y. Ying, J. Electroceram. 1, 7 (1997)10.1023/A:1009934829870 ↗
5. M. Mogensen, N.M. Sammes, G.A. Tompsett, Solid State Ionics 129, 63 (2000)10.1016/S0167-2738(99)00318-5 ↗
6. B.C.H. Steele, Solid State Ionics 129, 95 (2000)10.1016/S0167-2738(99)00319-7 ↗
7. H.L. Tuller, A.S. Nowick, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 38, 859 (1977)10.1016/0022-3697(77)90124-X ↗
8. H.L. Tuller, A.S. Nowick, J. Electrochem. Soc. 126, 209 (1979)10.1149/1.2129007 ↗
9. J.A. Kilner, C.D. Waters, Solid State Ionics 6, 253 (1982)10.1016/0167-2738(82)90046-7 ↗
10. S. Ling, Phys. Rev. B 49, 864 (1994)10.1103/PhysRevB.49.864 ↗
11. J.R. MacDonald, Impedance Spectroscopy: Emphasizing in Solid State Materials and Systems (Wiley, New York, 1987)
12. M.F. García-Sánchez, J.-C. M’Peko, A.R. Ruiz-Salvador, G. Rodríguez-Gattorno, Y. Echevarría, F. Fernández-Gutierrez, A. Delgado, J. Chem. Educ. 80, 1062 (2003)10.1021/ed080p1062 ↗
13. J. Frenkel, Kinetic Theory of Liquids (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1946)
14. J.-C. M’Peko, M.F. De Souza, Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 737 (2003)10.1063/1.1595729 ↗
15. F.S. Brugner, R.N. Blumenthal, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 54, 57 (1971)10.1111/j.1151-2916.1971.tb12172.x ↗
16. T.X.T. Sayle, S.C. Parker, C.R.A. Catlow, Surf. Sci. 316, 329 (1994)10.1016/0039-6028(94)91225-4 ↗
17. J.B. Wachtman, Mechanical Properties of Ceramics (Wiley, New York, 1996)
18. J.-C. M’Peko, D.L. Spavieri, M.F. De Souza, Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 2827 (2002)10.1063/1.1512328 ↗