journal article·2007-08-01

Rationale for laser classification measurement conditions

David H. Sliney, Wesley J. Marshall, E. Christopher Brumage

Journal of Laser Applications· Volume 19· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

The basic concept of laser hazard classification with four fundamental risk groups and several subclasses is well understood by most laser users. However, many readers of laser safety standards are frequently puzzled by the rigid measurement conditions applied for hazard classification, even if this is normally a task performed by the laser manufacturer and not by a laser user or a Laser Safety Officer. The historical rationale for the measurement conditions is provided and it is emphasized that the aim of each measurement is to simulate a wide range of ocular exposure conditions that would be reasonably foreseeable worst-case viewing conditions during the use of the laser product. Measurements, if needed to compare human exposures with the maximum permissible exposure limits, emphasize actual exposure conditions and generally do not match the measurement used for hazard classification.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ocular and Laser Science Research · Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Laser/Optical Radiation Program, U.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland 21010-5403

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. American National Standards Institute · 1973
2. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists · 1968
3. Performance Standard for Laser Products, Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 1040, in Federal Register
4. International Electrotechnical Commission, IEC 825 · 1984
5. International Electrotechnical Commission, IEC 60825-1 · 1993
6. Toward the development of laser safety standards for fiber-optic communication systems10.1364/AO.25.001038 ↗
7. American National Standards Institute · 1988
8. Laser and LED eye hazards: Safety standards
9. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health · 2005
10. Bingham · 2001
11. American National Standards Institute · 2007
12. Revision of the guidelines on limits of exposure to laser radiation of wavelengths between 400 nm and 1.4 μm10.1097/00004032-200010000-00013 ↗
13. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists · 2006
14. 1980 · 56
15. Commission International de l’Eclairage · 1987
16. Wolbarsht · 1971 · 163
17. Evaluation of optical radiation hazards10.1007/BF00934831 ↗
18. 1980
19. The American Conference of Government Industrial Hygienist · 1973
20. Comparative study of argon and ruby retinal damage thresholds
21. What is the meaning of threshold in laser injury experiments? Implications for human exposure limits10.1097/00004032-200203000-00006 ↗
22. Adjustment of guidelines for exposure of the eye to optical radiation from ocular instruments: Statement from a task group of the International Commission of Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP)10.1364/AO.44.002162 ↗
23. 1980 · 221
24. Laser hazard evaluation method for middle infrared laser systems10.2351/1.4745424 ↗
25. Intrabeam viewing of extended-source lasers with telescopes10.2351/1.2567885 ↗
26. Methods for hazard assessment from viewing fiber optics with eye loupes10.2351/1.1771246 ↗
27. Determining source size from diode laser systems10.2351/1.1514238 ↗
28. 2003 · 70
29. Retinal image motion during deliberate fixation: Implications to laser safety for long duration viewing10.1097/00004032-200002000-00002 ↗
30. Guidelines on limits of exposure to broad-band incoherent optical radiation (0.38–3 μm)
31. Evaluation of the apparent source in laser safety10.2351/1.1373435 ↗
32. 2004
33. 1980
34. 1997
35. Photochem. Photobiol. · 2007 · 83 · 42510.1562/2006-11-14-RA-1081 ↗
36. 2001
37. 2006