journal article·2017-05-01

Monte Carlo method for the analysis of laser safety for a high-powered lidar system under different atmospheric conditions

Robert A. Stillwell, Peter Pilewskie, Jeffrey P. Thayer, Michael O'Neill, Ryan R. Neely

Journal of Laser Applications· Volume 29· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

A major concern of high-powered atmospheric lidar systems is eye safety. Atmospheric lidars are often run unattended in adverse weather conditions where scattering redirects laser energy from the main beam. These naturally varying “soft targets” (such as fog and precipitation) are not accounted for in American National Standards Institute (ANSI) standards but, through multiple scattering events, can potentially create adverse viewing conditions. This paper introduces a Monte Carlo method that uses scattering phase functions for fog and snow and applies multiple scattering analysis to map the energy density within a scattering volume around the primary beam. Careful attention is given to accurately describing the forward scattering portion of the phase function as it scatters a significant amount of the beam energy. This method is compared to ANSI standard hazard zone calculations to determine what effect scattering has on the size of the hazard zone. For direct beam viewing, hazard zone size estimates are within about 3% of the ANSI defined Nominal Ocular Hazard Distance (NOHD) for clear air but are approximately 56% smaller than the NOHD as optical density increases for scattering in fog and approximately 33% smaller for scattering in blowing snow. For indirect beam exposure, clear air gives the worst approximation to the ANSI defined Nominal Hazard Zone (NHZ), in error by approximately 93%; fog approaches the ANSI results, within 30% error, whereas blowing snow shows 70% error. Finally, scattering enhancement mechanisms are considered which relate to the definition of the scattering layer of interest and increase scattered energy density observed by approximately 4%. In all cases, the ANSI calculated NOHD and NHZ are larger than the hazard zones that include scattering but the size of the zones is inextricably linked to the type of scattering ignored in the standard NOHD and NHZ calculations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ocular and Laser Science Research · Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics · Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

University of Colorado Aerospace Engineering Sciences, University of Colorado at Boulder, ECNT 320, 431 UCB, , Boulder, Colorado 80309

University of Colorado Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences Department, University of Colorado at Boulder, 311 UCB, , Boulder, Colorado 80309 and Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, University of Colorado at Boulder, 1234 Innovation Drive, Boulder, Colorado 80303

University of Colorado at Boulder Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Science, , 216 UCB, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309

University of Colorado Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado at Boulder, 216 UCB, , Boulder, Colorado 80309; School of Earth and Environment, , Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom ; and National Centre for Atmospheric Science, , Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom

The University of Leeds Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado at Boulder, 216 UCB, , Boulder, Colorado 80309; School of Earth and Environment, , Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom ; and National Centre for Atmospheric Science, , Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom

University of Leeds Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado at Boulder, 216 UCB, , Boulder, Colorado 80309; School of Earth and Environment, , Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom ; and National Centre for Atmospheric Science, , Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom

References (39)

Show source-provided references
2. 1984
3. Weitkamp · 2005
4. Turn-key Raman lidar for profiling atmospheric water vapor, clouds, and aerosols10.1364/AO.37.004979 ↗
5. Ramses: German meteorological service autonomous Raman lidar for water vapor, temperature, aerosol, and cloud measurements10.1364/AO.51.008111 ↗
6. Field-deployable diode-laser-based differential absorption lidar (dial) for profiling water vapor10.5194/amt-8-1073-2015 ↗
7. Rotational Raman lidar measurements of atmospheric temperature in the uv10.1029/2003GL018342 ↗
8. Lidars with narrow fov for daylight measurements10.1109/TGRS.2015.2401333 ↗
9. Novel polarization-sensitive micropulse lidar measurement technique10.1364/OE.15.002785 ↗
10. Rayleigh lidar system for middle atmosphere research in the arctic10.1117/1.601361 ↗
11. The alomar Rayleigh/Mie/Raman lidar: objectives, configuration, and performance
12. American National Standard (ANSI Z136.1) · 2014
13. American National Standard (ANSI Z136.6) · 2015
14. 2005
15. 1992
16. Methods for variance reduction in Monte Carlo simulations10.1117/12.2213470 ↗
17. Monte Carlo calculations of light scattering from clouds10.1364/AO.7.000415 ↗
18. Reflection of light pulses from clouds10.1364/AO.10.002304 ↗
19. A Monte Carlo model of light propagation in tissue
20. MCML—Monte Carlo modeling of light transport in multi-layered tissues10.1016/0169-2607(95)01640-F ↗
21. Spectrally consistent scattering, absorption, and polarization properties of atmospheric ice crystals at wavelengths from 0.2 to 100 μm10.1175/JAS-D-12-039.1 ↗
22. The use of the Henyey–Greenstein phase function in Monte Carlo simulations in biomedical optics10.1088/0031-9155/51/17/N04 ↗
23. Physically reasonable analytic expression for the singlescattering phase function10.1364/AO.31.003152 ↗
24. Henyey-greenstein and mie phase functions in Monte Carlo radiative transfer computations10.1364/AO.35.003270 ↗
25. 2006
26. 2006
27. 1998
28. Optical constants of ice from the ultraviolet to the microwave10.1364/AO.23.001206 ↗
29. Modeling focusing Gaussian beams in a turbid medium with Monte Carlo simulations10.1364/OE.23.008699 ↗
30. High and dry: New observations of tropospheric and cloud properties above the Greenland ice sheet10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00249.1 ↗
31. Polarization lidar at summit, Greenland for the detection of cloud phase and particle orientation
32. 1971
33. Resilience of persistent arctic mixed-phase clouds10.1038/ngeo1332 ↗
34. A satellite-based climatology of fog and low-level stratus in Germany and adjacent areas10.1016/S0169-8095(02)00075-3 ↗
35. A global view of horizontally oriented crystals in ice clouds from cloud aerosol lidar and infrared pathfinder satellite observation (CALIPSO)10.1029/2009JD012365 ↗
36. Monte Carlo analysis of multiply scattered lidar returns10.1175/1520-0469(1976)033<1772:MCAOMS>2.0.CO;2 ↗
37. Semianalytic Monte Carlo radiative transfer model for oceanographic lidar systems10.1364/AO.20.003653 ↗
38. Computed laser backscattering from turbid liquids: Comparison with laboratory results10.1364/AO.21.002262 ↗
39. Exposure to backscattered laser radiation