journal article·2025-11-01

Data-efficient hybrid physics—Machine learning model for ultrafast laser ablation

Eric Mottay

Journal of Laser Applications· Volume 37· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Machine learning has been used to predict laser ablation depth but typically requires large data sets that are costly and slow to collect. This limits its usefulness in industrial applications where only a small number of measurements are available. We evaluate a hybrid model that combines the two-temperature model (TTM) with a residual neural network to improve prediction accuracy when training data are limited. The model retains the physics of the TTM and adds a targeted correction where its predictions diverge from measured values. We test this approach on four materials (silicon, steel, copper, and aluminum) and two scan types (line and raster) and compare it with both the TTM alone and a gradient boosting model. Tests focus on small training sets (10–100 samples) and evaluate prediction accuracy, sensitivity to sampling, and generalization across experimental setups. The hybrid model consistently gives higher R2 scores and lower normalized errors, outperforming both the TTM and machine learning models in low-data settings. These results show that machine learning can effectively improve the accuracy of physics-based models for industrial laser processing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Laser Material Processing Techniques · Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics · Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

h-nu , 33000 Bordeaux,

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. Ultrafast lasers—Reliable tools for advanced materials processing10.1038/lsa.2014.30 ↗
2. Industrial applications of ultrafast laser processing10.1557/mrs.2016.275 ↗
3. Ultrafast laser ablation simulator using deep neural networks10.1038/s41598-022-09870-x ↗
4. ICT data-driven active laser processing
5. Learning complexity to guide light-induced self-organized nanopatterns10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.226201 ↗
6. Fully automated data acquisition for laser production cyber-physical system10.1109/JSTQE.2021.3074516 ↗
7. Electron emission from metal surfaces exposed to ultrashort laser pulses
8. Ablation of metals by ultrashort laser pulses10.1364/JOSAB.14.002716 ↗
9. Accumulation effects in laser ablation of metals with high-repetition-rate lasers10.1117/12.782937 ↗
10. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045 ↗
11. Physics-Informed machine learning10.1038/s42254-021-00314-5 ↗
12. Parameters of influence in surface ablation and texturing of metals using high-power ultrafast laser10.2961/jlmn.2015.01.0001 ↗
13. Machine learning assisted optimization of surface roughness on silicon10.1117/12.3039016 ↗
14. Engineering model for ultrafast laser microprocessing10.1117/12.2206203 ↗
15. Factors controlling the incubation in the application of ps laser pulses on copper and iron surfaces10.1117/12.2004136 ↗
16. In-process monitoring in laser grooving with line-shaped femtosecond pulses using optical coherence tomography10.37188/lam.2022.033 ↗
17. Neural-network-assisted in situ processing monitoring by speckle pattern observation10.1364/OE.400785 ↗