journal article·2023-11-01Open access

Data-driven density prediction of AlSi10Mg parts produced by laser powder bed fusion using machine learning and finite element simulation

Bastian Bossen, Maxim Kuehne, Oleg Kristanovski, Claus Emmelmann

Journal of Laser Applications· Volume 35· Issue 4

Abstract

Powder bed fusion of metals using laser beam (PBF-LB/M) is a commonly used additive manufacturing process for the production of high-performance metal parts. AlSi10Mg is a widely used material in PBF-LB/M due to its excellent mechanical and thermal properties. However, the part quality of AlSi10Mg parts produced using PBF-LB/M can vary significantly depending on the process parameters. This study investigates the use of machine learning (ML) algorithms for the prediction of the resulting part density of AlSi10Mg parts produced using PBF-LB/M. An empirical data set of PBF-LB/M process parameters and resulting part densities is used to train ML models. Furthermore, a methodology is developed to allow density predictions based on simulated meltpool dimensions for different process parameters. This approach uses finite element simulations to calculate the meltpool dimensions, which are then used as input parameters for the ML models. The accuracy of this methodology is evaluated by comparing the predicted densities with experimental measurements. The results show that ML models can accurately predict the part density of AlSi10Mg parts produced using PBF-LB/M. Moreover, the methodology based on simulated meltpool dimensions can provide accurate predictions while significantly reducing the experimental effort needed in process development in PBF-LB/M. This study provides insights into the development of data-driven approaches for the optimization of PBF-LB/M process parameters and the prediction of part properties.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Laser and Systems Technology, Hamburg University of Technology 1 , Harburger Schloßstraße 28, Hamburg 21079, Germany

Fehrmann Materials X GmbH 2 , Stenzelring 19, Hamburg 21107, Germany

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. 2019
2. 2022
3. BIS Research · 2020
4. 2010
5. Optimization of SLM process parameters for Ti6Al4V medical implants10.1108/RPJ-05-2018-0112 ↗
6. Recent advances in alloy development for metal additive manufacturing in gas turbine/aerospace applications: A review10.1007/s41745-022-00290-4 ↗
7. Effiziente Qualifizierung neuer Legierungen für die additive Fertigung10.1007/s35725-019-0053-3 ↗
8. Laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing of metals; physics, computational, and materials challenges10.1063/1.4937809 ↗
9. C. Meier , R. W.Penny, Y.Zou., “Thermophysical phenomena in metal additive manufacturing by selective laser melting: Fundamentals, modeling, simulation and experimentation,” arXiv:1709.09510 (2017).10.1615/AnnualRevHeatTransfer.2018019042 ↗
10. A numerical study of processing parameters and their effect on the melt-track profile in laser powder bed fusion processes10.1016/j.addma.2023.103482 ↗
11. Investigation of SLM process in terms of temperature distribution and melting pool size: Modeling and experimental approaches10.3390/ma12081272 ↗
12. Machine learning in additive manufacturing: A review10.1007/s11837-020-04155-y ↗
13. Machine learning in additive manufacturing: State-of-the-art and perspectives10.1016/j.addma.2020.101538 ↗
14. Research and application of machine learning for additive manufacturing10.1016/j.addma.2022.102691 ↗
15. A review of machine learning techniques for process and performance optimization in laser beam powder bed fusion additive manufacturing10.1007/s10845-022-02012-0 ↗
16. Gaussian process-based surrogate modeling framework for process planning in laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing of 316L stainless steel10.1007/s00170-017-1045-z ↗
17. Process design of laser powder Bed fusion of stainless steel using a Gaussian process-based machine learning model10.1007/s11837-019-03792-2 ↗
18. Tensile properties prediction by multiple linear regression analysis for selective laser melted and post heat-treated Ti-6Al-4V with microstructural quantification10.1016/j.msea.2020.139549 ↗
19. Toward sub-surface pore prediction capabilities for laser powder bed fusion using data science10.1115/1.4050461 ↗
20. Comparative evaluation of supervised machine learning algorithms in the prediction of the relative density of 316L stainless steel fabricated by selective laser melting10.1007/s00170-021-06596-4 ↗
21. Density-based optimization of the laser powder bed fusion process based on a modelling framework10.3390/alloys2010004 ↗
22. A new approach to empirical optimization of laser powder bed fusion process for Ti6Al4V parts10.1007/s11665-023-08060-8 ↗
23. Machine learning-based optimization of process parameters in selective laser melting for biomedical applications10.1007/s10845-021-01773-4 ↗
24. Density prediction in powder bed fusion additive manufacturing: Machine learning-based techniques10.3390/app12147271 ↗
25. 2019
26. Influence of laser beam profile on the selective laser melting process of AlSi10Mg10.2351/7.0000100 ↗
27. 2021
28. Predicting melt track geometry and part density in laser powder bed fusion of metals using machine learning10.1007/s40964-022-00387-3 ↗
29. A critical review on the effects of process-induced porosity on the mechanical properties of alloys fabricated by laser powder bed fusion10.1007/s10853-022-06990-7 ↗
30. F. Pedregosa , G.Varoquaux, A.Gramfort., “Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python,” arXiv:1201.0490 (2012).
31. Productivity optimization of laser powder bed fusion by hot isostatic pressing10.1016/j.addma.2020.101494 ↗
32. 2020