Resilience of laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing to programmatically induced laser power anomalies
Source abstract
Abstract
Spatter interactions, varying power or scanner parameters, and uneven powder spreading in laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) can trigger the formation of lack-of-fusion or keyhole pores. In this paper, a strategy to mimic natural process anomalies is developed by varying the programmed laser power in a predefined region over sequential layers in order to understand the physics of pore formation and enable the systematic study of the sensitivity of LPBF processed Ti-6Al-4V to process anomalies. Results indicate that lack-of-fusion pores, caused by a decreased laser power input, and located at a depth equal to or less than the subsequent melt pool depth, are partially or fully healed by subsequent, nominally processed layers. Under conditions tested here, lack-of-fusion pores as deep as two layers (∼120 μm) below the surface are healed on subsequent layers. Conversely, local increases in laser power cause persistent keyhole pores, owing to the depth at which keyhole pores become entrapped into the melt—in this work, up to eight layers or 420 μm deep. These results show that while keyhole-induced porosity remains unaffected by the processing of subsequent layers, LPBF is resilient to a set of process anomalies, which would result in lack-of-fusion if not for subsequent remelting on layers above.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Laser Material Processing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Applied Research Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University 1 , University Park, Pennsylvania 16802
John Deere 2 , Moline, Illinois 61265
Funding
America Makes
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Making sense of 3-D printing: Creating a map of additive manufacturing products and services10.1016/j.addma.2014.08.005 ↗
2. Design for additive manufacturing: Trends, opportunities, considerations, and constraints10.1016/j.cirp.2016.05.004 ↗
3. Additive manufacturing of medical instruments: A state-of-the-art review10.1016/j.addma.2019.03.015 ↗
4. Additive manufacturing processes in medical applications10.3390/ma14010191 ↗
5. Metal additive manufacturing in aerospace: A review10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110008 ↗
6. A review on qualification and certification for metal additive manufacturing10.1080/17452759.2021.2018938 ↗
7. Invited review article: Review of the formation and impact of flaws in powder bed fusion additive manufacturing10.1016/j.addma.2020.101457 ↗
8. Spatter formation in selective laser melting process using multi-laser technology10.1016/j.matdes.2017.06.040 ↗
9. Dynamics of pore formation during laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing10.1038/s41467-019-10693-0 ↗
10. Multi-laser powder bed fusion of Ti–6Al–4V alloy: Defect, microstructure, and mechanical property of overlap region10.1016/j.msea.2020.140644 ↗
11. In-situ detection of redeposited spatter and its influence on the formation of internal flaws in laser powder bed fusion10.1016/j.addma.2021.102370 ↗
12. Reducing near-surface voids in metal (Ti-6Al-4V) powder bed fusion additive manufacturing: The effect of inter-hatch travel time10.1016/j.addma.2020.101592 ↗
13. Direct observation of pore formation mechanisms during LPBF additive manufacturing process and high energy density laser welding10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2020.103555 ↗
14. Observation of keyhole-mode laser melting in laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.06.005 ↗
15. Keyhole fluctuation and pore formation mechanisms during laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing10.1038/s41467-022-28694-x ↗
16. Universal scaling laws of keyhole stability and porosity in 3D printing of metals10.1038/s41467-021-22704-0 ↗
17. The influence of porosity on fatigue crack initiation in additively manufactured titanium components10.1038/s41598-017-06504-5 ↗
18. Influence of defects, surface roughness and HIP on the fatigue strength of Ti-6Al-4V manufactured by additive manufacturing10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.07.020 ↗
19. Influence of defects on mechanical properties of Ti–6Al–4V components produced by selective laser melting and electron beam melting10.1016/j.matdes.2015.07.147 ↗
20. Defect distribution and microstructure heterogeneity effects on fracture resistance and fatigue behavior of EBM Ti–6Al–4V10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.06.001 ↗
21. Fatigue performance of additive manufactured TiAl6V4 using electron and laser beam melting10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.05.001 ↗
22. Analysis of the effect of internal defects on fatigue performance of additive manufactured metals10.1016/j.msea.2020.139385 ↗
23. Influence of the position and size of various deterministic defects on the high cycle fatigue resistance of a 316L steel manufactured by laser powder bed fusion10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105930 ↗
24. Effect of stress triaxiality and penny-shaped pores on tensile properties of laser powder bed fusion Ti-6Al-4V10.1016/j.addma.2021.102414 ↗
25. Influence of laser processing strategy and remelting on surface structure and porosity development during selective laser melting of a metallic material10.1007/s11661-019-05348-0 ↗
26. In situ radiographic and ex situ tomographic analysis of pore interactions during multilayer builds in laser powder bed fusion10.1016/j.addma.2020.101512 ↗
27. In situ 3D X-ray microtomography of laser-based powder-bed fusion (L-PBF)—A feasibility study10.1016/j.addma.2020.101271 ↗
28. Predicting laser powder bed fusion defects through in-process monitoring data and machine learning10.1016/j.matdes.2022.111115 ↗
29. Correlating in-situ sensor data to defect locations and part quality for additively manufactured parts using machine learning10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.117476 ↗
30. Combined effect of surface anomalies and volumetric defects on fatigue assessment of AlSi7Mg fabricated via laser powder bed fusion10.1016/j.addma.2019.100918 ↗
31. Hot isostatic pressing in metal additive manufacturing: X-ray tomography reveals details of pore closure10.1016/j.addma.2020.101191 ↗
32. Uncovering the coupled impact of defect morphology and microstructure on the tensile behavior of Ti-6Al-4V fabricated via laser powder bed fusion10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.117113 ↗
33. Investigation of the sensitivity of the fatigue resistance to defect position in aluminium alloys obtained by selective laser melting using artificial defects10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105505 ↗
34. Layerwise anomaly detection in laser powder-Bed fusion metal additive manufacturing10.1115/1.4042108 ↗
35. Artificial porosity introduced during L-PBF of IN718, and its effect on fatigue performance before and after HIP10.1080/00325899.2021.1971870 ↗
36. A study of the microstructural evolution during selective laser melting of Ti–6Al–4V10.1016/j.actamat.2010.02.004 ↗
37. Scanlab · 2014
38. Automated defect recognition for additive manufactured parts using machine perception and visual saliency
39. Flaw identification in additively manufactured parts using X-ray computed tomography and destructive serial sectioning10.1007/s11665-021-05567-w ↗
40. Specification for Fusion Welding for Aerospace Applications · 2012 · D17
41. Quantitative evaluation of effects of non-metallic inclusions on fatigue strength of high strength steels. I. Basic fatigue mechanism and evaluation of correlation between the fatigue fracture stress and the size and location of non-metallic inclusions10.1016/0142-1123(89)90054-6 ↗