journal article·2018-08-01

Precision structuring and functionalization of ceramics with ultra-short laser pulses

Maria Friedrich, Michael Seiler, Sebastian Waechter, Jens Bliedtner, Jean P. Bergmann

Journal of Laser Applications· Volume 30· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

High-performance ceramics have been firmly established for the manufacturing of tools and components in the modern electronics industry and mechatronics. Various components such as circuit boards, bearings, and sensors benefit from their specific characteristics, such as wear resistance, stiffness, and electrical neutrality. Apart from these advantages, the brittleness and hardness of ceramics turn the mechanical processing into a challenging and difficult task. Against this background, modern laser technologies have already been used to process ceramics for many years, enabling a contactless and wear-free machining. However, regarding high precision applications, for instance, the drilling of micro-holes or the fabrication of well-defined cavities and three-dimensional structures, conventional laser processes reach their limits. Especially due to thermal influences of the laser radiation, brittle edges, stresses, and redeposited layers emerge. Ultrashort pulse lasers enable completely new processing qualities in these fields. The extremely short pulse durations within the pico- and femtosecond range lead to nonlinear absorption mechanisms and an almost athermal material removal. Thereby, dielectric materials can be processed precisely and gently. In the course of a comprehensive process study, the beam–material interactions of ultrashort pulses with ceramics have been investigated. Besides the material properties, the ablation process is influenced by a multitude of laser parameters, such as wavelength, pulse overlap, and fluence. In order to reveal the most important variables, the experiments have been conducted by applying modern statistical methods. Using alumina (Al2O3) as an example, it is shown how different parameter regimes lead to disparate process qualities and efficiencies. The generated models have been used to optimize industrially interesting applications, from the separation of ceramic printed circuit boards to the realization of precise design structures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Laser Material Processing Techniques · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Guenter Koehler Institute of Joining and Material Testing 1 , 07745 Jena, Germany

Ernst-Abbe-University of Applied Sciences 2 , 07745 Jena, Germany

Technical University Ilmenau 3 , 98693 Ilmenau, Germany

References (15)

Show source-provided references
1. P. Rudolph, “Physikalische Chemie der Laser-Material-Wechselwirkung mit Ba-Al-Borosilikatglas, AIN, SiC, SiC-TiC-TiB2,” Ph.D. thesis, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany, 2001.
2. Laser machining of structural ceramics – A review10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2008.11.010 ↗
3. J. Radtke, “Herstellung von Präzisionsdurchbrüchen in keramischen Werkstoffen mittels repetierender Laserbearbeitung,” Ph.D. thesis, Universität Stuttgart, Germany, 2003.
4. Femtosecond laser micro-structuring of alumina ceramic10.1016/j.apsusc.2005.03.005 ↗
5. Ablation characteristics of aluminum oxide and nitride ceramics during femtosecond laser micromachining10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.04.058 ↗
6. Parametric effects on femtosecond laser ablation of Al2O3 ceramics10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.10.090 ↗
7. Evolution of surface topography in one-dimensional laser machining of structural alumina10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.06.015 ↗
8. Differences in physical phenomena governing laser machining of structural ceramics10.1016/j.ceramint.2008.11.013 ↗
9. Parametric analysis and optimization of Nd:YAG laser micro-grooving of aluminum titanate (Al2TiO5) ceramics10.1007/s00170-006-0913-8 ↗
10. Predictive model and process parameters optimization of Nd:YAG laser micro-turning of ceramics10.1007/s00170-012-4161-9 ↗
11. 2010
12. 2007
13. 2008
14. A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code10.2307/1268522 ↗
15. 2016