journal article·2023-11-01Open access

Process development for laser powder bed fusion of GRCop-42 using a 515 nm laser source

Samira Gruber, Lukas Stepien, Leonid Gerdt, Elena Lopez, Jan Kieser, Frank Brueckner, Christoph Leyens, Craig Bratt

Journal of Laser Applications· Volume 35· Issue 4

Abstract

Copper is widely used in high heat flux and electrical applications because of its excellent electrical and thermal conductivity properties. Alloying elements such as chromium or nickel are added to strengthen the material, especially for higher temperatures. Cu4Cr2Nb, also known as GRCop-42, is a dispersion-strengthened copper-chromium-niobium alloy developed by NASA for high-temperature applications with high thermal and mechanical stresses such as rocket engines. Additive manufacturing (AM) enables applications with complex functionalized geometries and is particularly promising in the aerospace industry. In this contribution, a parametric study was performed for GRCop-42 and the AM process laser powder bed fusion (PBF-LB/M) using a green laser source for two-layer thicknesses of 30 and 60 μm. Density, electrical conductivity, hardness, microstructure, and static mechanical properties were analyzed. Various heat treatments ranging from 400 to 1000 °C and 30 min to 4 h were tested to increase the electrical conductivity and hardness. For both layer thicknesses, dense parameter sets could be obtained with resulting relative densities above 99.8%. Hardness and electrical conductivity could be tailored in the range of 103–219 HV2 and 24%–88% International Annealed Copper Standard (IACS) depending on the heat treatment. The highest ultimate tensile strength (UTS) obtained was 493 MPa. An aging temperature of 700 °C for 30 min showed the best combination of room temperature properties such as electrical conductivity of 83.76%IACS, UTS of 481 MPa, elongation at break (A) at 24%, and hardness of 125 HV2.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Fraunhofer Institute for Material and Beam Technology IWS 1 , 01277, Dresden, Germany

Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Luleå University of Technology 2 , 97187, Luleå, Sweden

TUD Dresden University of Technology, Institute of Materials Science 3 , 01069, Dresden, Germany

Fraunhofer USA—Center Midwest, Laser Applications Division 4 , Plymouth, Michigan 48170

Funding

Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. David L. Ellis , “GRCop-84: A high-temperature copper alloy for high-heat-flux applications,” NASA/TM—2005-213566 (2005).
3. Brazing characteristics, microstructure, and wettability of laser powder bed fusion additive manufactured GRCop-84 compared to CuCrZr and OFC, and brazing to titanium-zirconium-molybdenum alloy limiters10.1016/j.fusengdes.2022.113185 ↗
4. K. G. Cooper , J. L.Lydon, M. D.LeCorre, Z. C.Jones, D. S.Scannapieco, D. L.Ellis, and B. A.Lerch, “Three-dimensional printing GRCop-42,” NASA/TM—2018–220129 (2018).
5. Laser additive manufacturing of oxide dispersion-strengthened copper–chromium–niobium alloys10.3390/jmmp6050102 ↗
6. Brazing, laser, and electron-beam welding of additively manufactured GRCop-84 copper for phased array lower hybrid launchers10.1109/TPS.2019.2963638 ↗
7. Nuclear response of additive manufactured GRCop-84 copper for use in lower hybrid launchers in a fusion environment10.1016/j.fusengdes.2020.111726 ↗
8. Resolution and geometric limitations in laser powder bed fusion additively manufactured GRCop-84 structures for a lower hybrid current drive launcher10.1016/j.fusengdes.2021.112847 ↗
9. Fracture characteristics and heat treatment of laser powder bed fusion additively manufactured GRCop-84 copper10.1016/j.msea.2021.141690 ↗
10. Precipitate size in GRCop-42 and GRCop-84 Cu-Cr-Nb alloy Gas atomized powder and L-PBF additive manufactured material10.1080/15361055.2022.2147765 ↗
12. Comparison of GRCop-84 to other Cu alloys with high thermal conductivities10.1007/s11665-007-9175-3 ↗
13. Copper-based alloys for structural high-heat-flux applications: A review of development, properties, and performance of Cu-rich Cu–Cr–Nb alloys10.1080/09506608.2020.1821485 ↗
14. 2019
15. Size effects on microstructure and mechanical properties of additively manufactured copper–chromium–niobium alloy10.1016/j.msea.2021.141511 ↗
16. Robust metal additive manufacturing process selection and development for aerospace components10.1007/s11665-022-06850-0 ↗
17. End to end process evaluation for additively manufactured liquid rocket engine thrust chambers10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.02.034 ↗
18. 10.2514/6.2021-323310.2514/6.2021-3233 ↗
19. Thermophysical properties of additively manufactured (AM) GRCop-42 and GRCop-8410.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.106665 ↗
20. D. S. Scannapieco , J. J.Lewandowski, R. B.Rogers, and D. L.Ellis, “In-situ alloying of GRCop-42 via additive manufacturing: Precipitate analysis,” NASA/TM-20205003857 (2020).
21. Halo formation in arc-melted Cr–Nb alloys10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2012.07.042 ↗