journal article·2023-05-01

Quality classification model with machine learning for porosity prediction in laser welding aluminum alloys

Joys S. Rivera, Marc-Olivier Gagné, Siyu Tu, Noureddine Barka, François Nadeau, Abderrazak El Ouafi

Journal of Laser Applications· Volume 35· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

The growing implementation of aluminum alloys in industry has focused interest on studying transformation processes such as laser welding. This process generates different kinds of signals that can be monitored and used to evaluate it and make a quality analysis of the final product. Internal defects that are difficult to detect, such as porosity, are one of the most critical irregularities in laser welding. This kind of defect may result in a critical failure of the manufactured goods, affecting the final user. In this research, a porosity prediction method using a high-speed camera monitoring system and machine learning (ML) algorithms is proposed and studied to find the most performant methodology to resolve the prediction problem. The methodology includes feature extraction by high-speed X-ray analysis, feature engineering and selection, imbalance treatment, and the evaluation of the ML algorithms by metrics such as accuracy, AUC (area under the curve), and F1. As a result, it was found that the best ML algorithm for porosity prediction in the proposed setup is Random Forest with a 0.83 AUC and 75% accuracy, 0.75 in the F1 score for no porosity, and 0.76 in the F1 score for porosity. The results of the proposed model and methodology indicate that they could be implemented in industrial applications for enhancing the final product quality for welded plates, reducing process waste and product quality analysis time, and increasing the operational performance of the process.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mathematics, Computer Science and Engineering, Université du Québec à Rimouski 1 , Rimouski, Québec, Canada

National Research Council Canada—Aluminum Technology Centre 2 , Québec City, Canada

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. A survey of welding robot intelligent path optimization10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.04.085 ↗
2. Applications of laser welding in the shipbuilding industry
3. Applications of laser welding in the automotive industry
4. Defect formation mechanisms and preventive procedures in laser welding
5. Introduction: Fundamentals of laser welding
6. Multi-sensor information fusion for monitoring disk laser welding10.1007/s00170-015-8032-z ↗
7. Developments in modelling and simulation of laser and hybrid laser welding
8. Quality assessment in laser welding: A critical review10.1007/s00170-017-0461-4 ↗
9. Intelligent laser welding through representation, prediction, and control learning: An architecture with deep neural networks and reinforcement learning10.1016/j.mechatronics.2015.09.004 ↗
10. Infrared (IR) quality assessment of robotized resistance spot welding based on machine learning10.1007/s00170-021-08320-8 ↗
11. Numerical study of keyhole dynamics and keyhole-induced porosity formation in remote laser welding of Al alloys10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.12.019 ↗
12. Multi-sensing signals diagnosis and CNN-based detection of porosity defect during Al alloys laser welding10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.12.004 ↗
13. Prediction of laser welding quality by computational intelligence approaches10.1016/j.ijleo.2017.04.088 ↗
14. Deep-learning-based porosity monitoring of laser welding process10.1016/j.mfglet.2020.01.001 ↗
15. A study on weld defects classification in gas metal arc welding process using machine learning techniques10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.159 ↗
16. A cognitive approach for quality assessment in laser welding10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.119 ↗
17. A numerical approach to modeling keyhole laser welding10.1007/s00170-014-6674-x ↗
18. Real-time penetration state monitoring using convolutional neural network for laser welding of tailor rolled blanks10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.01.006 ↗
19. Real-time monitoring of high-power disk laser welding based on support vector machine10.1016/j.compind.2017.10.003 ↗
20. Laser beam oscillating welding of 5A06 aluminum alloys: Microstructure, porosity and mechanical properties10.1016/j.optlastec.2018.09.036 ↗
21. Weld formation mechanism of fiber laser oscillating welding of austenitic stainless steel10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.05.021 ↗
22. Visualization of laser back-reflection distribution during laser welding10.1088/1757-899X/1135/1/012015 ↗
23. Multiple-optics sensing of high-brightness disk laser welding process10.1016/j.ndteint.2013.07.005 ↗
24. Numerical and experimental study on keyhole and melt flow dynamics during laser welding of aluminium alloys under subatmospheric pressures10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.12.165 ↗
25. Flow dynamics during single- and dual-spot laser welding with one common keyhole of 321 stainless steel10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.01.041 ↗
26. Effects of keyhole status on melt flow and flow-induced porosity formation during double-sided laser welding of AA6056/AA6156 aluminium alloy T-joint10.1016/j.optlastec.2018.07.065 ↗
27. Feature selection and classification in multiple class datasets: An application to KDD Cup 99 dataset10.1016/j.eswa.2010.11.028 ↗
28. Selecting critical features for data classification based on machine learning methods10.1186/s40537-019-0278-0 ↗
29. Online porosity defect detection based on convolutional neural network for Al alloy laser welding10.1088/1742-6596/1884/1/012008 ↗
30. A quantitative model of keyhole instability induced porosity in laser welding of titanium alloy10.1007/s11661-014-2231-3 ↗
31. High-speed simultaneous observation of plasma and keyhole behavior during high power CO2 laser welding: Effect of shielding gas on porosity formation10.2351/1.1324717 ↗
32. Machine learning: A review of classification and combining techniques10.1007/s10462-007-9052-3 ↗
33. M. Grandini, E. Bagli, and G. Visani, “Metrics for Multi-Class Classification: An Overview,” see http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.05756 (2020).
34. Implementation of machine-learning classification in remote sensing: An applied review10.1080/01431161.2018.1433343 ↗
35. Digital twin-driven supervised machine learning for the development of artificial intelligence applications in manufacturing10.1080/0951192X.2020.1747642 ↗
36. B. Xu, N. Wang, T. Chen, and M. Li, “Empirical Evaluation of Rectified Activations in Convolutional Network,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1505.00853 (2015).
37. Random forests for multiclass classification: Random MultiNomial logit10.1016/j.eswa.2007.01.029 ↗
38. Catboost model and artificial intelligence techniques for corporate failure prediction10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120658 ↗
39. Machine learning for patient-specific quality assurance of VMAT: Prediction and classification accuracy10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.07.049 ↗
40. Deep ROC analysis and AUC as balanced average accuracy to improve model selection, understanding and interpretation10.1109/TPAMI.2022.3145392 ↗
41. 2013
42. Correlation and simple linear regression
43. Principles of correlation analysis
44. Effect of beam oscillating pattern on weld characterization of laser welding of AA6061-T6 aluminum alloy10.1016/j.matdes.2016.07.053 ↗
45. Boruta—A system for feature selection10.3233/FI-2010-288 ↗
46. 2020 · 80
47. 2016 · 5375