Quasi-static shear of structured magnetorheological suspensions
Source abstract
Abstract
This study investigates the experimental conditions necessary to observe a non-monotonic dependence of shear stress on quasi-static shear strain in structured magnetorheological (MR) fluids of a known composition. The research varies several key parameters, including the concentration and size of magnetic particles, the working gap between rheometer plates, the strength of the external magnetic field, and the material properties of the plates. Rheometric measurements are complemented by microstructural observations of low-concentration MR fluid specimens using X-ray computed microtomography. The results demonstrate that non-monotonic shear stress-strain behavior is characteristic of diluted MR suspensions with linear chain-like particle aggregates. Crucially, this phenomenon occurs only when using rheometer plates with magnetic microparticles embedded in their surface, and the microparticles must be of a size comparable to or larger than the transverse dimensions of the chain aggregates. Conversely, monotonic shear stress increases are observed with non-magnetic or entirely magnetic plates, irrespective of the MR fluid composition. These findings highlight the critical role of particle-structure interactions with the measuring geometry and provide insights into operating conditions for applications requiring precise control of static yield stress. The results also offer valuable experimental data to refine and validate models of MR fluid behavior under quasi-static shear.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids · Material Dynamics and Properties · Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Chair of Magnetofluiddynamics, Measuring and Automation Technology, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
Funding
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Bai X-X Chen P (2019) On the hysteresis mechanism of magnetorheological fluids. Frontiers in Materials 6: 36. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2019.0003610.3389/fmats.2019.00036 ↗
2. Borbáth T Günther S Yu Borin D et al. (2012) XμCT analysis of magnetic field-induced phase transitions in magnetorheological elastomers. Smart Materials and Structures 21: 105018. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/21/10/10501810.1088/0964-1726/21/10/105018 ↗
3. Borin D (2020) Targeted patterning of magnetic microparticles in a polymer composite. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 378: 20190256. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2019.025610.1098/rsta.2019.0256 ↗
4. Borin D (2026) Effect of particle aggregate size on the response of field-structured magnetic suspensions to quasi-static shear. European Physical Journal Special Topics. Epub ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjs/s11734-026-02232-y10.1140/epjs/s11734-026-02232-y ↗
5. Borin D Odenbach S (2023) Magnetic Soft Matter ed. de Vicente J. The Royal Society of Chemistry ch. 8 pp.213–228. https://doi.org/10.1039/BK9781839169755-0021310.1039/BK9781839169755-00213 ↗
6. Borin D Spörl EM Zubarev A et al. (2022) Surface influence on the stationary shear deformation of a magnetorheological fluid. European Physical Journal Special Topics 231: 1159–1163. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjs/s11734-022-00527-410.1140/epjs/s11734-022-00527-4 ↗
7. Bossis G Lançon P Meunier A et al. (2013) Kinetics of internal structures growth in magnetic suspensions. Physica 392: 1567–1576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2012.11.02910.1016/j.physa.2012.11.029 ↗
8. Bossis G Lemaire E Volkova O et al. (1997) Yield stress in magnetorheological and electrorheological fluids: A comparison between microscopic and macroscopic structural models. Journal of Rheology 41: 687–704. https://doi.org/10.1122/1.55083810.1122/1.550838 ↗
9. Bossis G Volkova O Lacis S et al. (2002) Ferrofluids Magnetically Controllable Fluids and Their Applications ed. Odenbach S. Springer pp.202–230.10.1007/3-540-45646-5_11 ↗
10. 10.1039/978183916975510.1039/9781839169755 ↗
11. Fernandes C Faroughi SA (2023) Particle-level simulation of magnetorheological fluids: A fully-resolved solver. International Journal of Multiphase Flow 169: 104604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2023.10460410.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2023.104604 ↗
12. Gandhi F Bullough WA (2005) On the phenomenological modeling of electrorheological and Magnetorheological FluidPreyieldBehaviorreyield behavior Fluid Preyield Behavior. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 16: 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389x0504964910.1177/1045389X05049649 ↗
13. Ginder JM Davis LC Elie LD (1996) Rheology of magnetorheological fluids: models and measurements. International Journal of Modern Physics B 10: 3293–3303. https://doi.org/10.1142/s021797929600174410.1142/S0217979296001744 ↗
14. Gómez-Ramírez A López-López MT González-Caballero F et al. (2012) Wall slip phenomena in concentrated ionic liquid-based magnetorheological fluids. Rheologica Acta 51: 793–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-012-0639-510.1007/s00397-012-0639-5 ↗
15. Hagenbüchle M Liu J (1997) Chain formation and chain dynamics in a dilute magnetorheological fluid. Applied Optics 36: 7664–7671. https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.36.00766410.1364/AO.36.007664 ↗
16. Jonkkari I Kostamo E Kostamo J et al. (2012) Effect of the plate surface characteristics and gap height on yield stresses of a magnetorheological fluid. Smart Materials and Structures 21: 075030. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/21/7/07503010.1088/0964-1726/21/7/075030 ↗
17. Kubík M Válek J Žáček J et al. (2022) Transient response of magnetorheological fluid on rapid change of magnetic field in shear mode. Scientific Reports 12: 10612. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14718-510.1038/s41598-022-14718-5 ↗
18. Laun HM Gabriel C (2007) Measurement modes of the response time of a magneto-rheological fluid (MRF) for changing magnetic flux density. Rheologica Acta 46: 665–676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-006-0155-610.1007/s00397-006-0155-6 ↗
19. Laun HM Gabriel C Kieburg C (2011) Wall material and roughness effects on transmittable shear stresses of magnetorheological fluids in plate–plate magnetorheometry. Rheologica Acta 50: 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-011-0531-810.1007/s00397-011-0531-8 ↗
20. Lemaire E Bossis G (1991) Yield stress and wall effects in magnetic colloidal suspensions. Journal of Physics D Applied Physics 24: 1473–1477. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/24/8/03710.1088/0022-3727/24/8/037 ↗
21. Li WH, Zhang XZ (2008) The effect of friction on magnetorheological fluids. Korea-Australia Rheology Journal 20: 45.
22. Martínez-Cano O Morillas JR Ruiz-Nievas J et al. (2025) High-speed videomicroscopy and magnetorheology under triaxial unsteady magnetic fields. Physical Review E 111: 025415. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.111.02541510.1103/PhysRevE.111.025415 ↗
23. Morillas JR DeVicente J (2019) On the yield stress in magnetorheological fluids: A direct comparison between 3D simulations and experiments. Composites Part B Engineering 160: 626–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.11410.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.114 ↗
24. Osial M Pregowska A Warczak M et al. (2023) Magnetorheological fluids: A concise review of composition physicochemical properties and models. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 34: 1864–1884. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389x23115735710.1177/1045389X231157357 ↗
25. Pei P Peng Y (2022) Constitutive modeling of magnetorheological fluids: A review. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 550: 169076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2022.16907610.1016/j.jmmm.2022.169076 ↗
26. Pei P Zhou T (2026) Magnetorheological Fluids for Damping Control: Advances in Modeling and Control. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 65: 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-026-10549-z10.1007/s11831-026-10549-z ↗
27. Phule PR Ginder JM (1999) Synthesis and properties of novel magnetorheological fluids having improved stability and redispersibility. International Journal of Modern Physics B 13: 2019. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021797929900209510.1142/S0217979299002095 ↗
28. Stepanov GV Zubarev AY (2025) Hysteretic behavior and non-linear uniaxial deformations in magnetic elastomer under the influence of an external magnetic field. Smart Materials and Structures 34: 125002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665x/ae1ae010.1088/1361-665X/ae1ae0 ↗
29. Tang X Conrad H (1996) Quasistatic measurements on a magnetorheological fluid. Journal of Rheology 40: 1167–1178. https://doi.org/10.1122/1.55077910.1122/1.550779 ↗
30. Wang S Han W Yu H et al. (2025) Microstructure and rheological properties evolution of bi-disperse magnetorheological fluids: From three-dimensional particle flow simulation to experiment. Journal of Molecular Liquids 425: 127173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2025.12717310.1016/j.molliq.2025.127173 ↗
31. Wang S He B Han W et al. (2024) Microstructural mechanical analysis and dynamics simulation of hollow soft magnetic particle-based magnetorheological fluids. In: Ruiand X Liu C (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Mechanical System Dynamics. ICMSD 2023. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer pp.3187–3199 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8048-2_21810.1007/978-981-99-8048-2_218 ↗
32. Wereley N (2014) Magnetorheology. RSC Publishing.
33. Wu H Xu Z Wang J et al. (2021) Chain formation mechanism of magnetic particles in magnetorheological elastomers during pre-structure. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 527: 167693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2020.16769310.1016/j.jmmm.2020.167693 ↗
34. Yu B Ma J Zhao X et al. (2024) Numerical simulation for microstructure evolution of magnetorheological fluid based on combined disk DDA-LBM approach. Powder Technology 437: 119585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2024.11958510.1016/j.powtec.2024.119585 ↗
35. Zubarev A Chirikov D Borin D (2020) Internal structures and elastic properties of concentrated magnetorheological fluids. European Physical Journal Special Topics 229: 2967–2979. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2020-000107-x10.1140/epjst/e2020-000107-x ↗