journal article·2026-06-02

Modeling and impact of mechanical faults in MR dampers on the seismic performance of controlled structures

Payman Hosseini, Pegah Naderpoor Shad, Touraj Taghikhany

Publisher page

Abstract

During earthquakes, faults in smart dampers can pose significant challenges to seismic control of structures. Although magnetorheological (MR) dampers are widely used, they remain vulnerable to both mechanical and electrical faults. This study investigates commonly observed defects in MR dampers and develops corresponding mathematical models based on experimental findings. The faulty damper models are then incorporated into a 20-story building to evaluate their effects on the performance of controlled structures and the effectiveness of different control strategies under seismic excitation. Two control algorithms—adaptive and optimal—are implemented, and their performances are evaluated under various fault scenarios. The results demonstrate that oil leakage levels of 5% and 10% considerably degrade damper efficiency. Moreover, defects such as particle trapping and orifice clogging cause approximately 30% and 50% increases in damper force output, respectively. Oil leakage faults result in the largest values of maximum displacements, velocities and base shear forces compared with particle trapping and orifice clogging faults. In contrast, particle trapping and orifice clogging faults lead to higher maximum accelerations. The adverse effects of faulty dampers on control performance depend on their location within the structure. A strong dependence is observed between ground motion characteristics and the resulting structural responses under these two fault types.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids · Seismic Performance and Analysis · Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

Department of Civil Engineering, Buein Zahra Technical University, Buein Zahra, Qazvin, Iran

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2014.09.02010.1016/j.jmmm.2014.09.020 ↗
2. 10.1177/1045389X2097791310.1177/1045389X20977913 ↗
3. 10.1007/s42417-024-01292-510.1007/s42417-024-01292-5 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.08.03110.1016/j.engstruct.2013.08.031 ↗
5. 10.1007/s40996-024-01514-610.1007/s40996-024-01514-6 ↗
6. 10.1007/978-981-99-6774-2_4610.1007/978-981-99-6774-2_46 ↗
7. 10.38208/acp.v1.63410.38208/acp.v1.634 ↗
8. Chaudhuri P, Maity D, Maiti DK (2025) Experimental study of horizontal MR damper for sinusoidally loaded framed structure. Earthquakes and Structures 28(3): 221.
9. Chen K, Yu X, Wang H, et al. (2021) Modeling of a Bingham model of a magnetorheological damper considering stochastic uncertainties in their geometric variables. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics 59(1): 53–65.
10. Chopra AK (ed.) (2017) Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, 5th edn. Pearson.
11. 10.1177/1045389X23122083710.1177/1045389X231220837 ↗
12. 10.1177/1045389X22111155510.1177/1045389X221111555 ↗
13. 10.1088/0964-1726/5/5/00610.1088/0964-1726/5/5/006 ↗
14. 10.1088/0964-1726/24/12/12503010.1088/0964-1726/24/12/125030 ↗
15. 10.11648/j.am.20150401.1110.11648/j.am.20150401.11 ↗
16. Foister RT Iyengar VR Yurgelevic SM (2002) Stabilization of magnetorheological fluid suspensions using a mixture of organoclays. US Patent 6 497 829.
17. 10.1177/1045389X2098878410.1177/1045389X20988784 ↗
18. 10.1177/107754631668795810.1177/1077546316687958 ↗
19. 10.1007/s42417-020-00212-710.1007/s42417-020-00212-7 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.istruc.2023.01.07010.1016/j.istruc.2023.01.070 ↗
21. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.611-612.74610.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.611-612.746 ↗
22. 10.1143/JJAP.51.06730110.1143/JJAP.51.067301 ↗
23. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:7(873)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:7(873) ↗
24. 10.1177/1077546321107006210.1177/10775463211070062 ↗
25. 10.1186/s40712-019-0109-210.1186/s40712-019-0109-2 ↗
26. 10.1007/s42417-024-01292-510.1007/s42417-024-01292-5 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jestch.2015.03.00210.1016/j.jestch.2015.03.002 ↗
28. 10.1007/s42417-020-00215-410.1007/s42417-020-00215-4 ↗
29. 10.1111/mice.1280510.1111/mice.12805 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jsv.2025.11954010.1016/j.jsv.2025.119540 ↗
31. Park JH, Park OO (2001) Electrorheology and magnetorheology. Korea-Australia Rheology Journal 13(1): 13–17.
32. 10.1177/1045389X22107968010.1177/1045389X221079680 ↗
33. 10.1088/0964-1726/19/3/03501210.1088/0964-1726/19/3/035012 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jsv.2019.05.05210.1016/j.jsv.2019.05.052 ↗
35. Shad PN, Taghikhany T (2024) Semi-active control of building structures under seismic action with faulty MR dampers and sensors. Smart Structures and Systems 34(4): 271–282.
36. Shirgir S, Azar BF, Hadidi A (2021) Reliability-based simplification of Bouc–Wen model and parameter identification using a new hybrid algorithm. Structures 34: 297–308.
37. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1997)123:3(230)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1997)123:3(230) ↗
38. Spencerx FJr, Christenson RE, Dyke SJ (1998) Next generation benchmark control problem for seismically excited buildings. In: Proceedings of the second world conference on structural control, Kyoto, Japan, 28 June–1 July 1998, pp.1351–1360.
39. 10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00225-310.1016/S0141-0296(97)00225-3 ↗
40. 10.1007/s12206-012-0625-y10.1007/s12206-012-0625-y ↗
41. 10.1155/2015/16369410.1155/2015/163694 ↗
42. 10.3390/ma1111219510.3390/ma11112195 ↗
43. 10.1088/1757-899X/114/1/01210110.1088/1757-899X/114/1/012101 ↗
44. 10.1177/1045389X24128832410.1177/1045389X241288324 ↗
45. 10.1002/stc.228010.1002/stc.2280 ↗
46. 10.1177/1045389X23115736210.1177/1045389X231157362 ↗
47. 10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00097-910.1016/S0141-0296(01)00097-9 ↗
48. 10.1088/1361-665X/abf75610.1088/1361-665X/abf756 ↗
49. 10.1088/1361-665X/abadd210.1088/1361-665X/abadd2 ↗
50. 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.000166610.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001666 ↗