Aerodynamic modeling and design optimization of a variable-pitch variable-camber piezocomposite rotor
Source abstract
Abstract
Multi-rotor vehicles either use complex mechanisms to control blade pitch angle or use the rotor speed to control the thrust and torque to attain stability, and control. An alternate approach to attain thrust and torque control is by morphing the blades without the use of complex mechanisms, and without varying the rotor speed. This method may require fewer mechanical components, could lead to higher efficiency, and achieve rapid change in thrust. In this context, a variable—camber, variable-pitch hybrid piezocomposite rotor prototype is modeled, optimized, and experimentally tested on a single degree of freedom test setup. The mechanism-free compliant blades are actuated with the Macro-Fiber Composite actuators. First, the baseline aerodynamic model to predict thrust and torque coefficients is presented. The experiments are used to identify the so-called unknown coefficients of an empirical model, and to identify a physics-based correction formula to account for flow induced deformations on the compliant blades. The refined aerodynamic model is used to conduct parametric analyses to predict the thrust and torque coefficients as a function of pitch and the excitation by the piezocomposite actuators. The model is then used for design optimization leading to several optimal designs based on a limited parameter space. Three objective functions are evaluated: Maximizing thrust, minimizing torque, and maximizing thrust-to-torque ratio. The aerodynamic characteristics of these designs are also presented.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control · Piezoelectric Actuators and Control · Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/1537649080190785510.1080/15376490801907855 ↗
2. 10.1088/0964-1726/7/3/01710.1088/0964-1726/7/3/017 ↗
3. 10.1088/0964-1726/6/4/01510.1088/0964-1726/6/4/015 ↗
4. 10.2514/6.2016-108010.2514/6.2016-1080 ↗
5. Bilgen O, Alberts TE (2016b) A direct-drive piezocomposite solid-state rotor with contactless power and data transmission. In: SMASIS 2016, Stowe, VT.
6. 10.1177/1045389X1039261310.1177/1045389X10392613 ↗
7. Bilgen O, Friswell M, Kochersberger K, et al. (2012) Surface actuated variable-camber and variable-twist morphing wings using piezocomposites. In: 52nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference, Denver, CO.
8. 10.1088/0964-1726/19/5/05501010.1088/0964-1726/19/5/055010 ↗
9. 10.2514/1.4545210.2514/1.45452 ↗
10. 10.1115/SMASIS2019-555810.1115/SMASIS2019-5558 ↗
11. 10.1177/1045389X970080050410.1177/1045389X9700800504 ↗
12. Deters RW, Ananda Krishnan GK, Selig MS (2014) Reynolds number effects on the performance of small-scale propellers. In: 32nd AIAA applied aerodynamics conference, p.2151.
13. Drela M Youngren H (2003) XROTOR User Guide. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Available at: http://web.mit.edu/drela/Public/web/xrotor/xrotor_doc.txt
14. Durand WF (1963) Aerodynamic Theory: A General Review of Progress. P. Smith.
15. 10.1007/s11029-008-0007-910.1007/s11029-008-0007-9 ↗
16. Grohmann B, Maucher C, Jänker P (2006) Actuation concepts for morphing helicopter rotor blades. In: 25th International congress of the aeronautical sciences, Hamburg, Germany, pp.3–8.
17. 10.1115/1.404687210.1115/1.4046872 ↗
18. High JW (2003) Method of Fabricating NASA-Standard Macro-Fiber Composite Piezoelectric Actuators, National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Langley Research Center.
19. 10.1515/978140086077710.1515/9781400860777 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.02.27110.1016/j.matpr.2018.02.271 ↗
21. 10.3846/16487788.2007.963596210.3846/16487788.2007.9635962 ↗
22. 10.1017/aer.2017.3210.1017/aer.2017.32 ↗
23. Mok J (2004) Design optimization of active twist rotor blades. Doctor of Philosophy, The Univerisyt of Michigan.
24. Moosavian A, Chae EJ, Pankonien AM, et al. (2017) A parametric study on a bio-inspired continuously morphing trailing edge. Bioinspiration, Biomimetics, and Bioreplication 2017, 1016204.
25. 10.1088/1361-665X/ab8fcb10.1088/1361-665X/ab8fcb ↗
26. 10.1117/12.200940010.1117/12.2009400 ↗
27. 10.1088/0964-1726/14/4/03310.1088/0964-1726/14/4/033 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2007.11.00610.1016/j.compositesb.2007.11.006 ↗
29. Shah B, Bilgen O (2020) A piezocomposite actuated propeller with an onboard power generator. In: ASME 2020 Conference on Smart Materials, Adaptive Structures and Intelligent Systems, p.V001T04A002.
30. 10.2514/1.J06402710.2514/1.J064027 ↗
31. 10.1017/aer.2016.6210.1017/aer.2016.62 ↗
32. Shin S (2005) Integral twist actuation of helicolpter rotor blades for vibration reduction. Doctor of Philosophy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
33. Thornburgh RP, Kreshock AR, Wilbur ML, et al. (2014) Continuous trailing-edge flaps for primary flight control of a helicopter main rotor. In American Helicopter Society (AHS) Annual Forum (No. NF1676L-17681).
34. Williams RB (2004) Nonlinear mechanical and actuation characterization of piezoceramic fiber composites. Doctor of Philosophy, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
35. 10.1177/002199830404055510.1177/0021998304040555 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ast.2016.06.01710.1016/j.ast.2016.06.017 ↗
37. 10.1017/aer.2020.13510.1017/aer.2020.135 ↗