Magnetorheological ultraviolet-curable resin and its mechanical properties for additive manufacturing
Source abstract
Abstract
Driven by labor shortages caused by aging population, the deployment of robots in fields such as food, agriculture, and medicine is expanding, increasing the demand for soft grippers capable of handling flexible and delicate objects. While additive manufacturing facilitates the creation of complex shapes, the resulting mechanical complexity poses challenges for control. Although magnetorheological fluids (MRFs) and elastomers (MREs) offer potential solutions with magnetic-field-responsive properties, conventional methods struggle to balance controllability with manufacturability. To address this, we propose a magnetorheological ultraviolet-curable resin (MRUVR) capable of selectively functioning as an MRF in uncured state and as an MRE after ultraviolet (UV) curing. This approach enables the monolithic fabrication of grippers possessing regions with distinct magnetic properties using a single material and process. This paper presents the material design and characterization of MRUVR and examines the mechanical property variations of both cured and uncured MRUVR. The MRUVR was prepared using soft resin and two types of magnetic particles. Experimental results confirmed that the MR effect is present in both the uncured and cured states of the MRUVR. The optimal conditions for MRE fabrication involve using 74 μm particles at a mixing ratio of 5 vol% and a curing time of approximately 1 min. These findings suggest that the mechanical behavior of the device is governed by a synergistic mechanism involving both MRF and MRE characteristics. Furthermore, the feasibility of fabricating such devices and their magnetic controllability are demonstrated. Future work will focus on improving the MRUVR using finer iron particles to suppress sedimentation and enhance the MR properties.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Soft Robotics and Applications · Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids · Micro and Nano Robotics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Graduate School of Science and Technology, Oita University, Japan
Faculty of Science and Technology, Oita University, Japan
Funding
Casio Science Promotion Foundation · Fund Program for Creating Research-based Startups from Academia
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Angelini F Petrocelli C Catalano MG et al. (2020) SoftHandler: An integrated soft robotic system for handling heterogeneous objects. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine 27: 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1109/mra.2019.295595210.1109/MRA.2019.2955952 ↗
2. Ashtiani M Hashemabadi SH Ghaffari A (2015) A review on the magnetorheological fluid preparation and stabilization. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 374: 716–730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2014.09.02010.1016/j.jmmm.2014.09.020 ↗
3. 10.1007/s10853-018-2012-210.1007/s10853-018-2012-2 ↗
4. Bastola AK Paudel M Li L (2020) Dot-patterned hybrid magnetorheological elastomer developed by 3D printing. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 494: 165825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.16582510.1016/j.jmmm.2019.165825 ↗
5. Bernat J Gajewski P Kapela R et al. (2022) Design fabrication and analysis of magnetorheological soft gripper. Sensors 22: 2757. https://doi.org/10.3390/s2207275710.3390/s22072757 ↗
6. Choi DS Kim TH Lee SH et al. (2020) Beyond human hand: Shape-adaptive and reversible magnetorheological elastomer-based robot gripper skin. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 12: 44147–44155. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c1178310.1021/acsami.0c11783 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.500609410.1063/1.5006094 ↗
8. Chu CY Patterson RM (2018) Soft robotic devices for hand rehabilitation and assistance: A narrative review. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation 15: 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-018-0350-610.1186/s12984-018-0350-6 ↗
9. Costi L Georgopoulou A Mondal S et al. (2024) 3D printable self-sensing magnetorheological elastomer. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering 309: 2300294. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.20230029410.1002/mame.202470003 ↗
10. De Vicente J Klingenberg DJ Hidalgo-Alvarez R (2011) Magnetorheological fluids: A review. Soft Matter 7: 3701–3710. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0sm01221a10.1039/c0sm01221a ↗
11. Elfferich JF Dodou D Santina CD (2022) Soft robotic grippers for crop handling or harvesting: A review. IEEE Access 10: 75428–75443. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2022.319086310.1109/ACCESS.2022.3190863 ↗
12. Georgopoulou A Vanderborght B Clemens F (2021) Fabrication of a soft robotic gripper with integrated strain sensing elements using multi-material additive manufacturing. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 8: 615991. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2021.61599110.3389/frobt.2021.615991 ↗
13. Hao Y Zhang S Fang B et al. (2022) A review of smart materials for the boost of soft actuators soft sensors and robotics applications. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering 35: 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10033-022-00707-210.1186/s10033-022-00707-2 ↗
14. Kang S Choi K Nam JD et al. (2020) Magnetorheological elastomers: Fabrication characteristics and applications. Materials 13: 4597. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1320459710.3390/ma13204597 ↗
15. 10.1177/1045389X1142867410.1177/1045389X11428674 ↗
16. Li R Chen F Yu W et al. (2024) A novel cable-driven soft robot for surgery. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science) 29: 60–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-022-2497-310.1007/s12204-022-2497-3 ↗
17. McDonald K Rendos A Woodman S et al. (2020) Magnetorheological fluid-based flow control for soft robots. Advanced Intelligent Systems 2: 2000139. https://doi.org/10.1002/aisy.20200013910.1002/aisy.202070107 ↗
18. Pagoli A Chapelle F Corrales-Ramon JA et al. (2021) Review of soft fluidic actuators: Classification and materials modeling analysis. Smart Materials and Structures 31: 013001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/ac383a10.1088/1361-665X/ac383a ↗
19. Polygerinos P Correll N Morin SA et al. (2017) Soft robotics: Review of fluid-driven intrinsically soft devices manufacturing sensing control and applications in Human-Robot Interaction. Advanced Engineering Materials 19: 1700016. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20170001610.1002/adem.201700016 ↗
20. Shimoma K, Kikuchi T (2026) Hybrid smart structure of magnetorheological ultraviolet-curable resin. In: Proceedings of the 9th IEEE-RAS international conference on soft robotics.
21. Tsugami Y Barbié T Tadakuma K et al. (2017) Development of universal parallel gripper using reformed magnetorheological fluid. In: 11th Asian control conference (ASCC) New York p. 778–783. https://doi.org/10.1109/ASCC.2017.8287269.10.1109/ASCC.2017.8287269 ↗
22. Wang Y Xie Z Huang H et al. (2024) Pioneering healthcare with soft robotic devices: A review. Smart Medicine 3: e20230045. https://doi.org/10.1002/SMMD.2023004510.1002/SMMD.20230045 ↗
23. Yan J Shi P Xu Z et al. (2019) Design and kinematics of cable-driven soft module coupled with spring. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and biomimetics (ROBIO) p. 2195–2200. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBIO49542.2019.8961451.10.1109/ROBIO49542.2019.8961451 ↗
24. Yap YL Sing SL Yeong WY (2020) A review of 3D printing processes and materials for soft robotics. Rapid Prototyping Journal 26: 1345–1361. https://doi.org/10.1108/rpj-11-2019-030210.1108/RPJ-11-2019-0302 ↗
25. Zaidi S Maselli M Laschi C et al. (2021) Actuation technologies for soft robot grippers and manipulators: A review. Current Robotics Reports 2: 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43154-021-00054-510.1007/s43154-021-00054-5 ↗