journal article·2026-03-23

Geometric nonlinearity for 2D mechanical reservoir computing

Steven Kiyabu, Sebastian Toledo, Shan He, Amanda Criner, Patrick Musgrave, Philip R. Buskohl

Publisher page

Abstract

The sense-assess-respond feedback loop is a critical aspect of intelligence in both living and material systems. Physical reservoir computing is a strategy toward embodying intelligence into a system by leveraging nonlinear dynamics to perform nonlinear computations. While mechanical reservoirs typically produce nonlinear dynamics due to some material nonlinearity, geometric nonlinearity can also produce nonlinear dynamics due to the finite displacements and rotations in the network. This study examines the effect of both network node degree and geometry on the nonlinear computing performance of simulated mass-spring-damper systems comprised of linear springs. Smaller node degrees and sharper equilibrium angles in the network tended to produce greater nonlinear frequency content. However, the equilibrium geometry is not sufficient to characterize the reservoir performance as the dynamic variation in the spring angles also significantly correlates with nonlinear frequency content. This study highlights the significance of both network topology and dynamic geometry on the performance of mechanical reservoir computers.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing · Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices · Model Reduction and Neural Networks

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

UES, A BlueHalo Company, Dayton, OH, USA

Mechanical Engineering Department, Cedarville University, OH, USA

Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA

Materials and Manufacturing Directorate, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH, USA

Funding

Air Force Office of Scientific Research

References (57)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/wics.10110.1002/wics.101 ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.22.02405310.1103/PhysRevApplied.22.024053 ↗
3. 10.1088/1361-665X/adb7aa10.1088/1361-665X/adb7aa ↗
4. 10.1109/72.84674110.1109/72.846741 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41586-021-04138-210.1038/s41586-021-04138-2 ↗
6. 10.1162/isal_a_0077310.1162/isal_a_00773 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41598-021-92257-110.1038/s41598-021-92257-1 ↗
8. 10.1162/ARTL_a_0008010.1162/ARTL_a_00080 ↗
9. 10.1063/5.001464310.1063/5.0014643 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.509768610.1063/1.5097686 ↗
11. 10.1038/nature1896010.1038/nature18960 ↗
12. 10.1007/s11047-020-09823-110.1007/s11047-020-09823-1 ↗
13. 10.1016/0771-050X(80)90013-310.1016/0771-050X(80)90013-3 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41586-022-05004-510.1038/s41586-022-05004-5 ↗
15. 10.1073/pnas.231734012110.1073/pnas.2317340121 ↗
16. 10.1002/advs.20200195510.1002/advs.202001955 ↗
17. 10.1126/sciadv.160111410.1126/sciadv.1601114 ↗
18. 10.1007/978-3-540-39432-7_6310.1007/978-3-540-39432-7_63 ↗
19. Gallicchio C (2018) Chasing the echo state property. arXiv preprint. arXiv:1811.10892.
20. 10.1109/INISTA49547.2020.919461110.1109/INISTA49547.2020.9194611 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.neucom.2016.12.08910.1016/j.neucom.2016.12.089 ↗
22. 10.1007/s11071-025-11759-z10.1007/s11071-025-11759-z ↗
23. 10.1088/1367-2630/ac024d10.1088/1367-2630/ac024d ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.04.00610.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.04.006 ↗
25. 10.1007/s00422-012-0471-010.1007/s00422-012-0471-0 ↗
26. Heilmann O (2023) Multifunctional echo state networks: Effects of topology and memory on the reconstruction of chaotic attractors. PhD Thesis, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität.
27. 10.1016/j.neunet.2024.10676610.1016/j.neunet.2024.106766 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.neucom.2025.13115810.1016/j.neucom.2025.131158 ↗
29. 10.1080/00401706.1970.1048863410.1080/00401706.1970.10488634 ↗
30. 10.1038/s41467-018-08055-310.1038/s41467-018-08055-3 ↗
31. 10.1038/s41586-021-03453-y10.1038/s41586-021-03453-y ↗
32. 10.1073/pnas.242499112210.1073/pnas.2424991122 ↗
33. 10.1038/s41928-019-0318-y10.1038/s41928-019-0318-y ↗
34. 10.1002/adfm.20210512810.1002/adfm.202105128 ↗
35. 10.35848/1347-4065/ab8d4f10.35848/1347-4065/ab8d4f ↗
36. 10.1038/srep1048710.1038/srep10487 ↗
37. 10.1115/SMASIS2024-14101410.1115/SMASIS2024-141014 ↗
38. 10.1038/srep0028710.1038/srep00287 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2025.11271110.1016/j.ymssp.2025.112711 ↗
40. 10.1098/rspa.2025.000210.1098/rspa.2025.0002 ↗
41. Schrauwen B, Buesing L, Legenstein R (2008) On computational power and the order-chaos phase transition in reservoir computing. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 21: 1–8.
42. 10.1038/s41565-023-01530-z10.1038/s41565-023-01530-z ↗
43. 10.1007/978-981-13-1687-6_1410.1007/978-981-13-1687-6_14 ↗
44. 10.1515/nanoph-2016-013210.1515/nanoph-2016-0132 ↗
45. 10.1109/IJCNN.2010.559649210.1109/IJCNN.2010.5596492 ↗
46. 10.2514/6.2024-173210.2514/6.2024-1732 ↗
47. Vincent T Nelson D Grossmann B et al. (2023) Open-Cavity Fluid Flow as an Information Processing Medium. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. Available at: https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.2023-139310.2514/6.2023-1393 ↗
48. 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-210.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 ↗
49. 10.1007/978-0-8176-4580-910.1007/978-0-8176-4580-9 ↗
50. 10.1002/aisy.20240053410.1002/aisy.202400534 ↗
51. 10.1038/s41586-021-03623-y10.1038/s41586-021-03623-y ↗
52. 10.1098/rsfs.2018.002310.1098/rsfs.2018.0023 ↗
53. 10.1063/5.027271710.1063/5.0272717 ↗
54. 10.1038/s41598-023-31994-x10.1038/s41598-023-31994-x ↗
55. 10.1002/advs.20230507410.1002/advs.202305074 ↗
56. Zhang Y, Wang K (2022a) Enabling mechano-intelligence in adaptive structures utilizing physical computing. Active and Passive Smart Structures and Integrated Systems XVI 12043: 409–417.
57. 10.2514/6.2022-146410.2514/6.2022-1464 ↗