Compensation for the effect of temperature in the electromechanical impedance method using polynomial regression through parametric inference
Source abstract
Abstract
Compensating for temperature effects in the electromechanical impedance method is crucial for structural monitoring. Therefore, this work introduces a data processing protocol using polynomial regression modeling to establish baseline impedance signatures at different temperatures from those collected, helping to develop a damage metric. Polynomial models were defined for each analyzed frequency point and evaluated through residual normality, independence, homogeneity, and a minimum coefficient of determination (R 2 ). The ratio between the frequency points that have valid polynomials and the total frequency points per impedance signature corresponded to 89.6% and 92.1% for the storage system profile experiment. For the silo profile experiment, the total frequency points per impedance were 96.1% and 97.6%. It was observed that the number of peaks and valleys in the impedance signatures and the degree of the polynomial influence the number of frequency points with valid data polynomials. The Correlation Coefficient Deviation (CCD) and threshold values derived from the valid polynomials were higher than the measured counterparts and showed consistency with the effective frequency shift (EFS) method. These findings demonstrate that the number of valid polynomials was sufficient to support polynomial regression as a robust and reliable strategy for establishing baselines at unmeasured temperatures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Smart Materials for Construction · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
LMEst – Structural Mechanics Laboratory, INCT (EIE) – National Institute of Science and Technology, School of Mechanical Engineering, Federal University of Uberlândia, Brazil
School of Mathematics, Federal University of Uberlândia, Brazil
School of Electrical Engineering, Federal University of Uberlândia, Brazil
Funding
FAPEMIG
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/s1912280210.3390/s19122802 ↗
2. 10.3390/s14010120810.3390/s140101208 ↗
3. 10.1177/147592171141423410.1177/1475921711414234 ↗
4. 10.3390/s2303158710.3390/s23031587 ↗
5. 10.3390/ecsa-9-1318810.3390/ecsa-9-13188 ↗
6. 10.2307/191196310.2307/1911963 ↗
7. 10.1088/1361-6501/accebd10.1088/1361-6501/accebd ↗
8. Cochrane D, Orcutt GH (1949) Application of least squares regression to relationships containing auto- correlated error terms. Journal of the American Statistical Association 44(245): 32–61.
9. 10.1088/1361-665X/accf5210.1088/1361-665X/accf52 ↗
10. 10.1093/biomet/56.1.110.1093/biomet/56.1.1 ↗
11. 10.1177/1045389X2096317510.1177/1045389X20963175 ↗
12. 10.1177/1369433221103844410.1177/13694332211038444 ↗
13. 10.1177/147592172091712610.1177/1475921720917126 ↗
14. 10.1080/10589759.2024.232414910.1080/10589759.2024.2324149 ↗
15. 10.1080/10589759.2023.229708610.1080/10589759.2023.2297086 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2019.04.00410.1016/j.ndteint.2019.04.004 ↗
17. 10.1177/1045389X0808866410.1177/1045389X08088664 ↗
18. 10.1088/1361-665X/ad1c4f10.1088/1361-665X/ad1c4f ↗
19. 10.1088/1361-6501/ad4d1710.1088/1361-6501/ad4d17 ↗
20. 10.1590/S0104-6632199700020001010.1590/S0104-66321997000200010 ↗
21. 10.1080/10589759.2015.105837610.1080/10589759.2015.1058376 ↗
22. 10.1177/147592171882513810.1177/1475921718825138 ↗
23. 10.1177/147592171037951810.1177/1475921710379518 ↗
24. 10.1155/2012/16937210.1155/2012/169372 ↗
25. 10.1299/jsmea.42.24910.1299/jsmea.42.249 ↗
26. 10.1177/0583102403035600110.1177/05831024030356001 ↗
27. 10.1088/1361-665X/ac80e110.1088/1361-665X/ac80e1 ↗
28. 10.1177/1045389X1770521310.1177/1045389X17705213 ↗
29. 10.1177/147592171667103810.1177/1475921716671038 ↗
30. R Core Team (2025) An Introduction to R Notes on R: A Programming Environment for Data Analysis and Graphics. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
31. Royston JP (1982) An extension of Shapiro and Wilk’s W test for normality to large samples. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied Statistics 31(2): 115–124.
32. 10.4322/978-65-86503-88-3.c1110.4322/978-65-86503-88-3.c11 ↗
33. 10.1007/s40430-020-02458-410.1007/s40430-020-02458-4 ↗
34. Stefano S Quartagno M Tamburini M et al. (2018) orcutt: Estimate procedure in case of first order autocorrelation. R package version 2.3.
35. 10.3390/s1702025010.3390/s17020250 ↗
36. 10.1088/1361-665X/ade83710.1088/1361-665X/ade837 ↗
37. 10.3390/s1905110710.3390/s19051107 ↗