journal article·2026-03

A new rotary MR damper applicable to a semi-active suspension system featuring a low level between road surface and floor

Young-Jun Kim, Youngil Sohn, Sehyun Chang, Seung-Bok Choi, Jong-Seok Oh

Publisher page

Abstract

This study presents a rotary magnetorheological (MR) damper for a suspension system of low floor vehicles (LFVs) where a large stroke cannot be achieved due to the space constraints of damper motion for special purposes. As is well known, MR dampers are highly suitable for the semi-active suspension systems, which show controllable damping force by an external magnetic field. One of the crucial geometrical parameters to achieve high damping force at the same magnetic field is the suspension stroke in conventional linear MR dampers developed or proposed so far. However, LFVs which include purpose-built vehicles (PBVs) and future smart mobilities, do not have enough space for the linear MR damper installation. Due to the confined space in LFVs, the shape of the MR damper and the magnetic circuit design need to be carefully devised to achieve the target damping force. In addition, the time delay of the MR damper which affects suspension performance should be considered in the modeling and control processing. In this work, the time delay caused by increased inductance is resolved using the Smith compensator, which is integrated into the control system to mitigate the time delay, ensuring effective real-time control. The target control range and operating angle were decided through mathematical modeling and simulation, followed by the prototype fabrication and the measurement of the field-dependent damping force characteristics of the rotary MR damper. Subsequently, a quarter-car suspension model with the proposed MR damper is established to evaluate the suspension performance of LVFs. It is shown from the control simulation that the ride comfort (ISO 2631) is enhanced by up to 21%, while the velocity response is reduced by up to 52% under smooth (ISO B-Class) and rough (ISO D-Class) road profiles, respectively. The results presented in this work are useful guidelines for future smart mobilities featuring the space confinement between floor and road for damper installation in the development of the semi-active MR suspension system.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids · Railway Engineering and Dynamics · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Future Convergence Engineering, Kongju National University, Cheonansi, Republic of Korea

Mobility Drive Development Group, AVP Division, Hyundai Motor Company, Hwaseong-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea

Department of Mechanical Engineering, The State University of New York Korea (SUNY Korea), Incheon, Republic of Korea

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Industrial University of Ho Chi, Minh City (IUH), Vietnam

Department of Future Automotive Engineering, Kongju National University, Cheonansi, Republic of Korea

Funding

Hyundai Motor Group

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. ANSI/ASA S2.72-2002 (R2007) / ISO 2631-1:1997 (2002) Mechanical Vibration and Shock—Evaluation of Human Exposure to Whole-Body Vibration—Part 1: General Requirements. Melville NY: Acoustical Society of America.
2. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.05.02310.1016/j.engstruct.2010.05.023 ↗
3. Büyükköprü M, Uzunsoy E, Mouton X (2021) Global skyhook and groundhook control of vehicle with semi-active dampers. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Automotive Technologies Congress, (OTEKON 2020), Virtual Congress, 6–7 September 2021.
4. 10.1142/S021797929600130610.1142/S0217979296001306 ↗
5. 10.28991/cej-0309122010.28991/cej-03091220 ↗
6. 10.1007/s40430-019-1833-510.1007/s40430-019-1833-5 ↗
7. Farah F, Moreau X, Daou RAZ (2024) Comparative study of two sky hook strategies analyzed from a control theory perspective. In: IEEE In 2024 28th International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics (MMAR), Międzyzdroje, Poland, 27–30 August 2024, pp. 131–136. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
8. 10.1007/s40435-024-01489-210.1007/s40435-024-01489-2 ↗
9. 10.1007/s42417-024-01283-610.1007/s42417-024-01283-6 ↗
10. 10.1088/0964-1726/19/6/06500610.1088/0964-1726/19/6/065006 ↗
11. 10.3390/math903024910.3390/math9030249 ↗
12. Kamath GM, Wereley NM, Jolly MR (1998) Characterization of semi-active magnetorheological helicopter lag mode damper. In: Proceedings of the SPIE Conference on Smart Structure and Integrated Systems, San Diego, CA, 15 March 1998, vol. 3329, pp. 356377. Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
13. 10.3390/app1117789510.3390/app11177895 ↗
14. Khan MSA, Suresh A, Ramaiah NS (2012) Analysis of magnetorheological fluid damper with various piston profiles. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology 2(2): 77–83.
15. 10.3390/act1302008010.3390/act13020080 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.07.02610.1016/j.ifacol.2018.07.026 ↗
17. 10.1088/1361-665X/aaf0dc10.1088/1361-665X/aaf0dc ↗
18. 10.3390/en1010164710.3390/en10101647 ↗
19. 10.1177/1045389X1142527810.1177/1045389X11425278 ↗
20. 10.3390/act1304015510.3390/act13040155 ↗
21. 10.3390/wevj1002003610.3390/wevj10020036 ↗
22. 10.2486/indhealth.45.51210.2486/indhealth.45.512 ↗
23. 10.1109/TIE.2019.294253710.1109/TIE.2019.2942537 ↗
24. 10.5772/2455610.5772/24556 ↗
25. Shehata Gad A El-Zoghby H Oraby W et al. (2019) Application of a preview control with an MR damper model using genetic algorithm in semi-active automobile suspension. SAE Technical Paper 2019-01-5006.10.4271/2019-01-5006 ↗
26. 10.1088/0964-1726/24/3/03501310.1088/0964-1726/24/3/035013 ↗
27. Sohn YI Kim MJ Seong JH et al. (2023) Magnetorheological damper. US Patent Application No. 18/529 265 filed 5 December 2023.
28. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1997)123:3(230)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1997)123:3(230) ↗
29. Spencer BFJr, Yang G, Carlson JD, et al. (1998) Smart dampers for seismic protection of structures: A full-scale study. In: Proceedings of the second world conference on structural control 1. pp.417–426. Kyoto.
30. Technical Committee ISO/TC (1995) Mechanical Vibration–Road Surface Profiles–Reporting of Measured Data. International Organization for Standardization.
31. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.06.01310.1016/j.engstruct.2005.06.013 ↗
32. 10.1080/00423114.2015.103731310.1080/00423114.2015.1037313 ↗
33. Velagic J (2008) Design of Smith-like predictive controller with communication delay adaptation. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 47: 199–203.
34. 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.338084310.1109/ACCESS.2024.3380843 ↗
35. 10.1016/S0957-4158(01)00032-010.1016/S0957-4158(01)00032-0 ↗
36. 10.1243/095440799152687410.1243/0954407991526874 ↗
37. 10.1007/s12206-010-0801-x10.1007/s12206-010-0801-x ↗
38. 10.17576/jkukm-2021-si4(2)-1810.17576/jkukm-2021-si4(2)-18 ↗
39. 10.1080/00051144.2023.227749210.1080/00051144.2023.2277492 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.ergon.2014.09.00610.1016/j.ergon.2014.09.006 ↗