journal article·2025-07Open access

Experimental study of centrifugal pumping of magnetorheological fluid

Tim Dumais, Jean-Sébastien Plante, David Rancourt

Abstract

This paper studies the potential of using a centrifugal pump to handle magnetorheological fluid with the ultimate goal of integrating such a pump directly into a magnetorheological clutch to increase MR actuator life and stabilize performance over time. A centrifugal pump design is proposed, and two prototype sizes are constructed. Experimental characterization of the pumps prototypes reveals that, even with a magnetorheological fluid containing 40% V/V of ferromagnetic microparticles, the standard scaling laws for centrifugal pumps provide accurate predictions of performance with changes in rotation speed. However, the results showed that these laws do not fully account for geometric effects when scaling the pump size due to differences in impeller performance. The results also show that a centrifugal pump of 46 mm in diameter can effectively circulate magnetorheological fluid at a flow rate of 90 mL/min per shear interface in a commercial MR clutch.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids · Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles · Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Interdisciplinary Institute for Technological Innovation (3IT), Faculty of Engineering, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada

Exonetik, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada · Consortium de Recherche et d’innovation en Aérospatiale au Québec

References (69)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1142/S021797921530004210.1142/S0217979215300042 ↗
2. Alarabi A (2010) Effect of sand concentration ratio on centrifugal pump performance at various working temperatures. In HEFAT 2010, pp.1–7. Antalya, Turkey: International Conference on Heat Transfer, Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics.
3. Aligoodarz M, Dalvandi M, Mehrpanahi A (2020) Solid-phase effects on the performance of a centrifugal slurry pump using computational fluid dynamics. Journal of Computational and Applied Research in Mechanical Engineering 11: 243–255.
4. 10.1243/PIME_PROC_1976_190_041_0210.1243/PIME_PROC_1976_190_041_02 ↗
5. 10.1106/10453890202822110.1106/104538902028221 ↗
6. 10.1080/02726351.2010.50326410.1080/02726351.2010.503264 ↗
7. 10.1007/s12206-022-0413-210.1007/s12206-022-0413-2 ↗
8. 10.3390/mi1311190410.3390/mi13111904 ↗
9. 10.1109/ICRA.2015.713900210.1109/ICRA.2015.7139002 ↗
10. Crawford J, van Sittert F, Van Der Walt M (2012) The performance of centrifugal pumps when pumping ultra-viscous paste slurries. Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy 112: 297–964.
11. 10.1177/1045389X22111749610.1177/1045389X221117496 ↗
12. 10.1177/1045389X2098392310.1177/1045389X20983923 ↗
13. 10.1088/1742-6596/412/1/01202210.1088/1742-6596/412/1/012022 ↗
14. 10.1177/0954407022107950110.1177/09544070221079501 ↗
15. 10.21608/erjeng.2020.12546410.21608/erjeng.2020.125464 ↗
16. 10.1243/09576509JPE22410.1243/09576509JPE224 ↗
17. 10.1115/1.137903410.1115/1.1379034 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.est.2022.10464810.1016/j.est.2022.104648 ↗
19. 10.1002/cjce.2249510.1002/cjce.22495 ↗
20. 10.1115/1.291004210.1115/1.2910042 ↗
21. 10.1115/1.136632210.1115/1.1366322 ↗
22. 10.1115/IMECE2003-4313510.1115/IMECE2003-43135 ↗
23. Hussain YM, Burrow S, Henson L, et al. (2018) A review of techniques to mitigate jamming in electromechanical actuators for safety-critical applications. International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management 9(3): 1–11.
24. Ikeda A, Takano T, Abe I (2023) Kinematic analysis and evaluation of delta-type haptic device using twin-driven MR fluid actuator. In: Proceedings of 2023 IEEE/SICE international symposium on system integrations, Atlanta, GA, USA, 17–20 January, pp.76–81. New York: IEEE.
25. 10.1088/0964-1726/16/1/01910.1088/0964-1726/16/1/019 ↗
26. 10.1243/095765097153706010.1243/0957650971537060 ↗
27. 10.1177/1045389X2094395810.1177/1045389X20943958 ↗
28. Kikuchi T, Fukuyama R, Abe I (2024) Development of a fail-safe magnetorheological fluid device using electro and permanent magnets. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 32: 2582–2600.
29. 10.1109/AIM.2017.801411010.1109/AIM.2017.8014110 ↗
30. 10.1177/1045389X22114767510.1177/1045389X221147675 ↗
31. 10.1007/978-3-030-61799-810.1007/978-3-030-61799-8 ↗
32. 10.1177/1045389X21103871010.1177/1045389X211038710 ↗
33. 10.1088/0964-1726/18/9/09503210.1088/0964-1726/18/9/095032 ↗
34. 10.1088/0964-1726/16/6/02710.1088/0964-1726/16/6/027 ↗
35. 10.3390/app1409387110.3390/app14093871 ↗
36. 10.1177/1045389X2098808610.1177/1045389X20988086 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.molliq.2024.12439010.1016/j.molliq.2024.124390 ↗
38. 10.1177/1045389X2090647410.1177/1045389X20906474 ↗
39. 10.1177/1045389X21100690210.1177/1045389X211006902 ↗
40. Plante JS Denninger M Chouinard P et al. (2018) Magnetorheological fluid clutch apparatus and control systems US Patent 10 012 273.
41. Pullum L, Graham L, Rudman M (2007) Centrifugal pump performance calculation for homogeneous and complex heterogeneous suspensions. Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy 107: 373–379.
42. Rabinow J (1951) Magnetic fluid torque and force transmitting device US Patent 2 575 360.
43. Selim SM, El-kad MA, Hosien MA, et al. (2007) Effect of solid concentration on a centrifugal pump performance. Engineering Research Journal 30: 67–76.
44. 10.1002/cjce.545078042010.1002/cjce.5450780420 ↗
45. 10.1115/1.324266610.1115/1.3242666 ↗
46. 10.1088/1361-665X/ac586010.1088/1361-665X/ac5860 ↗
47. 10.1177/1045389X0708313610.1177/1045389X07083136 ↗
48. 10.20965/jrm.2022.p126810.20965/jrm.2022.p1268 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.apt.2019.07.00310.1016/j.apt.2019.07.003 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.apt.2020.11.00910.1016/j.apt.2020.11.009 ↗
51. Turcotte J, East W, Plante J-S (2022) Experimental assessment of a controlled slippage magnetorheological automotive active suspension for ride comfort. SAE International Journal of Vehicle Dynamics Stability and NVH 6(10-06-04-0024): 357–370.10.4271/10-06-04-0024 ↗
52. Usoro P Smith A Kao C et al. (2001) Magnetorheological fluid clutch US Patent 6 318 531.
53. 10.1109/LRA.2022.323152410.1109/LRA.2022.3231524 ↗
54. 10.1243/PIME_PROC_1984_198_006_0210.1243/PIME_PROC_1984_198_006_02 ↗
55. 10.1177/1045389X2097443710.1177/1045389X20974437 ↗
56. 10.1088/0964-1726/7/5/01510.1088/0964-1726/7/5/015 ↗
57. White F (2011) Fluid Mechanics. New-York: McGraw-Hill Education.
58. 10.1088/1742-6596/412/1/01201710.1088/1742-6596/412/1/012017 ↗
59. Wilson G (1987) The effects of slurries on centrifugal pump performance. In: 4th International Pump Users Symposium, Turbomachinery Laboratories, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University, 1987.
60. Wilson KC, Addie GR, Sellgren A, et al. (2006) Centrifugal pumps. In: Slurry Transport Using Centrifugal Pumps. Boston, MA: Springer US. pp.190–226.
61. Winslow W (1959) Field responsive fluid couplings US Patent 2 886 151.
62. 10.1177/1045389X22110349310.1177/1045389X221103493 ↗
63. 10.1088/1361-665X/acf3bc10.1088/1361-665X/acf3bc ↗
64. 10.1177/1045389X22109586910.1177/1045389X221095869 ↗
65. 10.1088/1361-665X/acf0a810.1088/1361-665X/acf0a8 ↗
66. 10.1177/1045389X23118994810.1177/1045389X231189948 ↗
67. 10.1177/1045389X0201301001210.1177/1045389X02013010012 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2024.17231310.1016/j.jmmm.2024.172313 ↗
69. 10.1109/TMECH.2024.339255410.1109/TMECH.2024.3392554 ↗