journal article·2020-05Open access

Adaptive control of normal load at the friction interface of bladed disks using giant magnetostrictive material

Mohammad Afzal, Leif Kari, Ines Lopez Arteaga

Abstract

A novel application of magnetostrictive actuators in underplatform dampers of bladed disks is proposed for adaptive control of the normal load at the friction interface to achieve the desired friction damping in the structure. Friction damping in a bladed disk depends on operating parameters, such as rotational speed, engine excitation order, nodal diameter normal contact load, and contact interface parameters, such as contact stiffness and friction coefficient. The operating parameters have a fixed value, whereas the contact interface parameters vary in an unpredictable way at an operating point. However, the ability to vary some of these parameters such as the normal contact load in a controlled manner is desirable to attain an optimum damping in the bladed disk at different operating conditions. Under the influence of an external magnetic field, magnetostrictive materials develop an internal strain that can be exploited to vary the normal contact load at the friction interface, which makes them a potentially good candidate for this application. A commercially available magnetostrictive alloy, Terfenol-D is considered in this analysis that is capable of providing magnetostrain up to 2 × 10 -3 under prestress and a blocked force over 1500 N. A linearized model of the magnetostrictive material, which is accurate enough for a direct current application, is employed to compute the output force of the actuator. A nonlinear finite element contact analysis is performed to compute the normal contact load between the blade platform and the underplatform damper as a result of magnetostrictive actuation. The nonlinear contact analysis is performed for different actuator mounting configurations and the obtained results are discussed. The proposed solution is potentially applicable to adaptively control vibratory stresses in bladed disks and consequently to reduce failure due to high-cycle fatigue. Finally, the practical challenges in employing magnetostrictive actuators in underplatform dampers are discussed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Brake Systems and Friction Analysis · Magnetic Bearings and Levitation Dynamics · Bladed Disk Vibration Dynamics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

The Marcus Wallenberg Laboratory for Sound and Vibration Research (MWL), KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden

Dynamics and Control, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

Funding

Swedish Energy Agency, Siemens Industrial Turbomachinery AB and GKN Aerospace

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1115/GT2016-5723010.1115/GT2016-57230 ↗
2. 10.1115/GT2015-4231810.1115/GT2015-42318 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2006.11.00310.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2006.11.003 ↗
4. 10.1115/GT2012-6967710.1115/GT2012-69677 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.sna.2010.10.01910.1016/j.sna.2010.10.019 ↗
6. Calkins FT · 1997
7. 10.1177/1045389X0607235810.1177/1045389X06072358 ↗
8. 10.1016/S1574-9304(05)80122-110.1016/S1574-9304(05)80122-1 ↗
9. COMSOL (2016) COMSOL Multiphysics 5.2a. Available at: https://www.comsol.se/events?gclid=CJyuwuXFydICFVDGsgodg2IJrQ
10. 10.12989/sem.2004.17.3_4.30310.12989/sem.2004.17.3_4.303 ↗
11. 10.1117/12.23907210.1117/12.239072 ↗
12. 10.1106/MJ6A-FBP9-9M61-0E1F10.1106/MJ6A-FBP9-9M61-0E1F ↗
13. 10.1109/20.84621710.1109/20.846217 ↗
14. 10.1177/1045389X0201301100510.1177/1045389X02013011005 ↗
15. 10.1115/1.169203010.1115/1.1692030 ↗
16. 10.1115/1.323025610.1115/1.3230256 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.sna.2007.12.03410.1016/j.sna.2007.12.034 ↗
18. 10.1088/0964-1726/22/12/12500510.1088/0964-1726/22/12/125005 ↗
19. 10.1117/12.78027610.1117/12.780276 ↗
20. 10.1016/0304-8853(86)90066-110.1016/0304-8853(86)90066-1 ↗
21. 10.1108/0332164091095894610.1108/03321640910958946 ↗
22. Kellogg R · 1999
23. 10.1115/GT2006-9010210.1115/GT2006-90102 ↗
24. 10.1115/1.400076310.1115/1.4000763 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2006.10.00210.1016/j.euromechsol.2006.10.002 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2006.11.00210.1016/j.euromechsol.2006.11.002 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.matdes.2006.12.01610.1016/j.matdes.2006.12.016 ↗
28. Petrov EP · 2002
29. 10.1115/1.218199810.1115/1.2181998 ↗
30. 10.1115/1.237277510.1115/1.2372775 ↗
31. 10.1109/20.53914310.1109/20.539143 ↗
32. 10.1115/1.138583010.1115/1.1385830 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2011.10.00510.1016/j.ymssp.2011.10.005 ↗
34. 10.1115/1.290384510.1115/1.2903845 ↗
35. 10.1115/2000-GT-054010.1115/2000-GT-0540 ↗
36. 10.1115/GT2006-9047310.1115/GT2006-90473 ↗
37. 10.1115/1.322742010.1115/1.3227420 ↗
38. 10.1115/1.277124010.1115/1.2771240 ↗
39. 10.1115/GT2005-6906210.1115/GT2005-69062 ↗
40. 10.1115/1.221888910.1115/1.2218889 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.automatica.2004.04.00610.1016/j.automatica.2004.04.006 ↗
42. Wu J · 2012
43. 10.1115/1.281813810.1115/1.2818138 ↗
44. 10.1115/1.281708210.1115/1.2817082 ↗
45. 10.1088/0964-1726/21/5/05501410.1088/0964-1726/21/5/055014 ↗
46. 10.1088/0964-1726/13/3/00410.1088/0964-1726/13/3/004 ↗
47. 10.1088/0964-1726/15/3/01510.1088/0964-1726/15/3/015 ↗
48. 10.1177/107754631244080910.1177/1077546312440809 ↗