journal article·2000-10

Frequency-Shaping with Spatial Compensators

G. Clark Smith, Robert L. Clark

Publisher page

Abstract

Practical realizations of adaptive structures should be designed and implemented to maximize performance, robustness and efficiency. A method of frequency-shaping the compensation of an adaptive structure is developed for increased performance, system robustness and efficiency. Robustness is defined as reduced coupling to out-of-bandwidth modes, where model fidelity frequently suffers, and to in-bandwidth modes that are considered not important for control. This method utilizes an open-loop metric of system coupling, through Hankel singular values of the controllability and oberservability Gramians, to determine the optimum transducer placements and sizes. The design metric is maximized with genetic algorithms. This optimum design process is computationally efficient. Results demonstrate that optimizing the design metric with genetic algorithms yields better performance and efficiency when compared to previous optimization methods and forms a basic method of “loop-shaping” by spatial design.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708-0302

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. Clark, R. L. · 1998
2. Smith, G. C. · Journal of Sound and Vibration · 1999
3. 10.2514/2.444910.2514/2.4449 ↗
4. 10.2514/2.402210.2514/2.4022 ↗
5. 10.2514/6.1990-108710.2514/6.1990-1087 ↗
6. 10.1006/jsvi.1999.246810.1006/jsvi.1999.2468 ↗
7. 10.2514/3.2179610.2514/3.21796 ↗
8. Boyd, S. · 1991
9. Smith, G. C.
10. 10.1121/1.42714210.1121/1.427142 ↗
11. 10.1007/978-3-662-02830-810.1007/978-3-662-02830-8 ↗
12. Ahmed, Q. · 1996 · 236
13. 10.2514/3.4905710.2514/3.49057 ↗
14. 10.2514/2.61110.2514/2.611 ↗
15. 10.1177/1045389X980090040710.1177/1045389X9800900407 ↗
16. Skogestad, S. · 1996
17. 10.1109/9.2942510.1109/9.29425 ↗
18. Smith, G. C. · Noise Control Engineering Journal · 1999