Baseline-free sensor fault detection for piezoelectric array
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, a new methodology is presented to detect the sensor fault for piezoelectric array based on the filtered frequency response function (FRF) shapes. The proposed method does not require prior knowledge about healthy piezoelectric array. First, the imaginary parts of FRFs from the piezoelectric array during vibration are measured and normalized to obtain the FRF shapes in different frequencies. Then the irregularities in these FRF shapes are extracted by using high-pass filter with properly chosen cut-off frequency. These abnormal irregularities on the filtered FRF shape curves indicate the location of the faulty sensor, due to the irregularity of FRF shapes introduced by the faulty piezoelectric element. The proposed sensor fault method is experimentally demonstrated on a clamped-clamped steel beam mounted with piezoelectric buzzer array. Two common piezoelectric sensor fault types including sensor breakage and debonding are evaluated. The experimental results indicate that the proposed method has great potential in the detection of the sensor fault for piezoelectric array as it is simple and does not require the FRF data of the healthy sensor array as a baseline.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Aircraft Engineering, Nanchang HangKong University, Nanchang, P. R. China
Funding
natural science foundation of jiangxi province · Aeronautical Science Foundation of China · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/147592170404562710.1177/1475921704045627 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2005.11.00110.1016/j.ymssp.2005.11.001 ↗
3. 10.1177/147592171351075510.1177/1475921713510755 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.sna.2018.01.00510.1016/j.sna.2018.01.005 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.sna.2015.11.03110.1016/j.sna.2015.11.031 ↗
6. 10.1106/GVD2-EGPN-C5B1-DPNX10.1106/GVD2-EGPN-C5B1-DPNX ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.10629910.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106299 ↗
8. 10.1088/1361-665X/ab906110.1088/1361-665X/ab9061 ↗
9. 10.1177/1045389X1347918210.1177/1045389X13479182 ↗
10. 10.3390/s2002051010.3390/s20020510 ↗
11. 10.1142/S175882511750003X10.1142/S175882511750003X ↗
12. 10.1016/j.conengprac.2020.10471910.1016/j.conengprac.2020.104719 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2008.10.00210.1016/j.ymssp.2008.10.002 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.10795610.1016/j.measurement.2020.107956 ↗
15. 10.1002/stc.198510.1002/stc.1985 ↗
16. 10.1007/978-981-13-7603-0_9110.1007/978-981-13-7603-0_91 ↗
17. 10.20855/ijav.2016.21.240810.20855/ijav.2016.21.2408 ↗
18. 10.3390/s1705111110.3390/s17051111 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.amc.2013.04.01610.1016/j.amc.2013.04.016 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.10718510.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107185 ↗
21. 10.1177/147592170809479210.1177/1475921708094792 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.01.03610.1016/j.ymssp.2015.01.036 ↗
23. 10.1007/s11012-016-0487-y10.1007/s11012-016-0487-y ↗
24. 10.1016/S0022-460X(02)01440-210.1016/S0022-460X(02)01440-2 ↗
25. 10.1080/15502287.2014.88323910.1080/15502287.2014.883239 ↗
26. 10.1006/jsvi.1999.234010.1006/jsvi.1999.2340 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jsv.2015.04.03410.1016/j.jsv.2015.04.034 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jsv.2014.08.02110.1016/j.jsv.2014.08.021 ↗
29. 10.1007/s10921-009-0048-610.1007/s10921-009-0048-6 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.10824110.1016/j.measurement.2020.108241 ↗