journal article·2021-02

Influence of hydraulic versus pneumatic working fluids on quasi-static force response of fluidic artificial muscles

Jonathan M Chambers, Norman M Wereley

Publisher page

Abstract

There is currently an increased interest in extending the application of McKibben actuators beyond gaseous environments and working fluids. Extensive efforts have already established force response models for pneumatically driven McKibben actuators that are independent of working fluid material properties, however, the model’s independence to working fluid choice has yet to be validated with empirical evidence. This paper experimentally investigates the effect of working fluid type on the quasi-static pressure dependent force-contraction response of McKibben actuators. Using either air or water as the working fluid, characteristic isobaric force-contraction response curves are compared for both large and small-scale McKibben actuators. To ensure truly isobaric force-contraction characterizations, hydraulic and pneumatic pressure systems were developed to provide precise and accurate control of pressure. Experimental testing proved using air or water as the working fluid resulted in nearly identical isobaric force-contraction response curves, demonstrating that McKibben actuator’s quasi-static force response is independent of working fluid choice. This study establishes that the applicability of existing force response models for pneumatic McKibben actuators can be extended to any practical liquids or gases.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics · Muscle activation and electromyography studies · Soft Robotics and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA

Funding

Office of Naval Research

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/978-3-540-69471-710.1007/978-3-540-69471-7 ↗
2. Blackburn J · 1960
3. 10.1115/IMECE2016-6529810.1115/IMECE2016-65298 ↗
4. Daerden F · European Journal of Mechanical and Environmental Engineering · 2002 · 47 · 11
5. 10.1177/1045389X1142210610.1177/1045389X11422106 ↗
6. DeLaHunt SA (2016) Variable Recruitment in bundles of miniature pneumatic artificial muscles and space qualified pneumatic artificial muscles. Master’s Thesis, University of Maryland, MD.10.1088/1748-3190/11/5/056014 ↗
7. 10.1088/1748-3190/11/5/05601410.1088/1748-3190/11/5/056014 ↗
8. 10.1088/0960-1317/20/4/04300110.1088/0960-1317/20/4/043001 ↗
9. 10.1109/IROS.2010.565043210.1109/IROS.2010.5650432 ↗
10. 10.1088/0964-1726/22/1/01401610.1088/0964-1726/22/1/014016 ↗
11. 10.1109/OCEANSKOBE.2008.453098910.1109/OCEANSKOBE.2008.4530989 ↗
12. Krutz GW · 2004 · 8
13. 10.1177/1045389X1454987210.1177/1045389X14549872 ↗
14. 10.1109/ROBIO.2009.542038210.1109/ROBIO.2009.5420382 ↗
15. Pillsbury TE · 2015 · 1
16. Ryu D · 2008 · 3028
17. 10.1016/j.sna.2015.08.02510.1016/j.sna.2015.08.025 ↗
18. Solano B, Laloy J, Rotinat-Libersa C (2011) Compact and lightweight hydraulic actuation system for high performance millimeter scale robotic applications: Modeling and experiments. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 22(13): 1479–1487.10.1177/1045389X11418860 ↗
19. 10.1177/1045389X1243862710.1177/1045389X12438627 ↗
20. 10.1108/0143991971019256310.1108/01439919710192563 ↗
21. 10.1177/1045389X1143349510.1177/1045389X11433495 ↗
22. 10.1109/ICAR.1991.24045810.1109/ICAR.1991.240458 ↗