journal article·2019-04

Probabilistic evaluation of the one-dimensional Brinson model’s sensitivity to uncertainty in input parameters

Ernur Karadoğan

Publisher page

Abstract

Brinson model is one of the most widely used shape memory alloy models due to its prediction power over a wide range of operating temperatures and inclusion of measurable engineering variables. The model involves parameters that are determined based on experimental data specific to a particular alloy. Therefore, it is subject to both experimental uncertainty and natural random variability in its parameters that propagate throughout the loading/unloading of the material. In this article, we analyse the sensitivity of the Brinson model to its parameters using a probabilistic approach, and present how the uncertainties in these parameters at different operating temperatures propagate as evidenced by the resulting stress–strain curves. The analyses were performed for isothermal loading/unloading and at various operating temperatures representing possible phase changes between martensite–austenite and martensite–martensite variants. The results show that the sensitivity of the model varies considerably based on the operating temperature and loading conditions. In addition, the variability in the model’s output is amplified after phase transitions during loading, and loading the material above the critical stress for martensite transition reduces variability during unloading. Based on the results of the sensitivity analysis, recommendations as to which parameters affect the variability of the model-predicted stress–strain curves are presented.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Topology Optimization in Engineering · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Engineering and Technology, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, USA

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. Andreasen GF (1977) Method and system for orthodontic moving of teeth. US4037324 Patent.
2. 10.14219/jada.archive.1971.020910.14219/jada.archive.1971.0209 ↗
3. 10.1088/0964-1726/14/4/00110.1088/0964-1726/14/4/001 ↗
4. 10.1115/1.310167410.1115/1.3101674 ↗
5. 10.1177/1045389X930040021310.1177/1045389X9300400213 ↗
6. 10.3233/JAE-2006-71410.3233/JAE-2006-714 ↗
7. 10.1016/0029-8018(68)90019-X10.1016/0029-8018(68)90019-X ↗
8. 10.1063/1.172960310.1063/1.1729603 ↗
9. Cho KJ · 2008 · 706
10. 10.3390/act303022610.3390/act3030226 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.168057110.1063/1.1680571 ↗
12. 10.1016/0021-9991(78)90097-910.1016/0021-9991(78)90097-9 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.43144010.1063/1.431440 ↗
14. Dye TE · 1990
15. 10.1109/ROBOT.1989.10020010.1109/ROBOT.1989.100200 ↗
16. 10.1243/09544100JAERO21110.1243/09544100JAERO211 ↗
17. Honma D · Journal of Robotic Systems · 1985 · 2 · 3
18. 10.1109/ROBOT.1990.12632310.1109/ROBOT.1990.126323 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.11.08410.1016/j.matdes.2013.11.084 ↗
20. 10.2214/ajr.175.2.175028910.2214/ajr.175.2.1750289 ↗
21. Khouri RK (2002) Method and apparatus for expanding soft tissue with shape memory alloys. US6478656 Patent.
22. 10.1115/1.402955710.1115/1.4029557 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00388-X10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00388-X ↗
24. 10.1109/MEMSYS.1989.7797810.1109/MEMSYS.1989.77978 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.07.00210.1016/j.matdes.2012.07.002 ↗
26. Liang C · 1990
27. 10.1088/1748-3182/6/2/02600710.1088/1748-3182/6/2/026007 ↗
28. 10.1590/S0100-879X200300060000110.1590/S0100-879X2003000600001 ↗
29. 10.1007/s11837-000-0082-410.1007/s11837-000-0082-4 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.msea.2003.10.32610.1016/j.msea.2003.10.326 ↗
31. 10.1109/ROBOT.2001.93258810.1109/ROBOT.2001.932588 ↗
32. 10.1007/s00402005026210.1007/s004020050262 ↗
33. 10.1109/AERO.2005.155957710.1109/AERO.2005.1559577 ↗
34. 10.1007/978-1-4684-2211-5_1010.1007/978-1-4684-2211-5_10 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.04.00910.1016/j.envsoft.2015.04.009 ↗
36. 10.1117/12.43655910.1117/12.436559 ↗
37. 10.1117/12.59945710.1117/12.599457 ↗
38. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19980905)41:3<481::AID-JBM19>3.0.CO;2-L10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19980905)41:3<481::AID-JBM19>3.0.CO;2-L ↗
39. Sanders AE · Nitinol spinal instrumentation and method for surgically treating scoliosis · 1994
40. 10.1097/00007632-199309000-0001210.1097/00007632-199309000-00012 ↗
41. 10.1002/jbm.82010060710.1002/jbm.820100607 ↗
42. 10.1109/TMECH.2012.220407010.1109/TMECH.2012.2204070 ↗
43. Simone F · 2015 · 9429 · 94290T
44. 10.1088/0964-1726/12/2/31010.1088/0964-1726/12/2/310 ↗
45. Suzuki M (1986) Rotatable door mirror for a motor vehicle. US4626085 Patent.
46. Tanaka K · Res Mechanica · 1986 · 18 · 251
47. Tanaka M · Bio-Medical Materials and Engineering · 1999 · 9 · 97
48. 10.1038/scientificamerican0395-6410.1038/scientificamerican0395-64 ↗
49. 10.1007/s00330000074710.1007/s003300000747 ↗
50. 10.1080/1025584050006291410.1080/10255840500062914 ↗
51. 10.1023/A:100469232924710.1023/A:1004692329247 ↗
52. 10.1007/s00586010034710.1007/s005860100347 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2010.04.00210.1016/j.mechatronics.2010.04.002 ↗
54. 10.1109/ROBIO.2005.24639910.1109/ROBIO.2005.246399 ↗
55. Zychowicz R (1992) Exterior view mirror for a motor vehicle. US5166832 Patent.