journal article·2013-11

Workshop on transitioning structural health monitoring technology to military platforms

Mark Seaver, Aditi Chattopadhyay, Antonia Papandreou-Suppapola, Seung B Kim, Narayan Kovvali, Charles R Farrar, Matt H Triplett, Mark M Derriso

Publisher page

Abstract

Interest in structural health monitoring/management is attracting lots of attention across a spectrum that ranges from sensor developers to end users. The US military, in particular, is making a concerted effort to implement condition-based maintenance as a means of reducing the life cycle costs and improving availability of various weapon platforms. Despite this effort, the majority of installed health monitoring systems are limited to rotating machinery such as engines, transmissions, and other gear boxes. The goal of this workshop was to bring together representatives from military, industry, and academia covering the spectrum from hardware developers to end users and platform managers and have them discuss issues that must be addressed as structural health monitoring systems mature to the point that managers will implement them. This article describes those discussions and highlights important issues that need to be addressed as structural health monitoring systems make the transition from laboratory scale demonstrations to real-world use.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Advanced Sensor Technologies Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Code 5673, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, 20375, USA

School for Engineering of Matter, Transport, and Energy, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA

School of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA

United Technologies Research Center, East Hartford, CT, 06118, USA

The Engineering Institute, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA

AMSRD-AMR-PS-AM, Redstone Arsenal, AL, 35898, USA

Air Vehicles Directorate, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright–Patterson Air Force Base, OH, 45433, USA

References (8)

Show source-provided references
1. Graettinger C. P., Garcia S., Siviy J., Schenk R. J., Van Syclke P. J. “Using the Technology Readiness Levels Scale to Support Technology Management in the DoD’s ATD/STO Environments”, Carnegie Mellon University Special Report SEI-2002-SR-027. Available at: http://www.sei.cmu.edu/library/abstracts/reports/02sr027.cfm (accessed 23 March 2012).10.21236/ADA407785 ↗
2. Kersey AD · 1991 · 325
3. 10.1109/50.61837710.1109/50.618377 ↗
4. MIL-HDBK-1823 (1999) Nondestructive evaluation system reliability assessment. Available at: http://www.barringer1.com/mil_files/MIL-HDBK-1823.pdf (accessed 17 November 2011).
5. Moorman RW (2010) HUMS evolves as maintenance tool. Aviation Week and Space Technology, 5 February. Available at: http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story_generic.jsp?channel=om&id=news/om/2010/02/01/OM_02_01_2010_p36-194047.xml&headline=HUMS%20Evolves%20as%20Maintenance%20Tool. (accessed 23 March 2012).
6. Park G, Rosing T, Todd MD, (2007) Energy harvesting for structural health monitoring sensor networks. Los Alamos National Laboratory Report, LA-14314-MS, February. Available at: http://institute.lanl.gov/ei/annual-workshops/ (accessed 13 March 2012).10.2172/902464 ↗
7. 10.1126/science.328761510.1126/science.3287615 ↗
8. Thompson RB · Materials Evaluation · 2001 · 69 · 861