Stability Analysis of Magnetostatic Boundary Value Problems for Magnetic SMAs
Source abstract
Abstract
Magnetic shape memory alloys have been the subject of much research in recent years as potential high actuation energy multifunctional materials. They can be considered as continua that deform under mechanical and magnetic forces. The constitutive magnetization response of such materials is highly non-linear with magnetic field. A boundary value problem where Maxwell’s equations of the magnetostatic problem are coupled with the non-linear constitutive behavior is solved using finite element analysis. The numerical simulation reveals localization zones of the field variables, which appear due to loss of ellipticity of the magnetostatic problem. Stability analysis is performed by considering the characteristics of the magnetostatic field equations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA,
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Calkins, F. · ’’ Journal of Intelligent Materials and Structural Systems · 2007 · 18 · 3059
2. Cullity, B.D. · 1972
3. 10.1016/S0022-5096(01)00050-310.1016/S0022-5096(01)00050-3 ↗
4. 10.1063/1.36464310.1063/1.364643 ↗
5. DeSimone, A. · Journal de Physique · 2003 · 112 · 969
6. 10.1007/978-1-4612-3226-110.1007/978-1-4612-3226-1 ↗
7. 10.1109/20.90876410.1109/20.908764 ↗
8. 10.1051/jp4:2003104010.1051/jp4:20031040 ↗
9. 10.1051/jp4:2003104410.1051/jp4:20031044 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0304-8853(02)00773-410.1016/S0304-8853(02)00773-4 ↗
11. 10.1007/BFb011363410.1007/BFb0113634 ↗
12. 10.1080/0141861980821425210.1080/01418619808214252 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.09.00410.1016/j.actamat.2005.09.004 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.04.00210.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.04.002 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.272114310.1063/1.2721143 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2006.09.03510.1016/j.jmmm.2006.09.035 ↗
17. Kiefer, B.
18. Kiefer, B.
19. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2005.08.00310.1016/j.mechmat.2005.08.003 ↗
20. Lagoudas, D.C.
21. 10.1016/j.jmps.2008.05.00410.1016/j.jmps.2008.05.004 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.msea.2003.10.35310.1016/j.msea.2003.10.353 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0304-8853(03)00400-110.1016/S0304-8853(03)00400-1 ↗
24. 10.1016/S0304-8853(00)00611-910.1016/S0304-8853(00)00611-9 ↗
25. 10.1063/1.128586710.1063/1.1285867 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.283877210.1063/1.2838772 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.36709410.1063/1.367094 ↗
28. O’Handley, R.C. · 2000
29. O’Handley, R.C.
30. 10.1063/1.37313610.1063/1.373136 ↗
31. 10.1016/S0924-4247(03)00153-510.1016/S0924-4247(03)00153-5 ↗
32. 10.1063/1.218945210.1063/1.2189452 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.274835610.1063/1.2748356 ↗
34. 10.1063/1.159907210.1063/1.1599072 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.09442710.1103/PhysRevB.70.094427 ↗
36. Tellinen, J.
37. Tickle, R. · 2000
38. 10.1016/S0304-8853(99)00292-910.1016/S0304-8853(99)00292-9 ↗
39. 10.1109/20.79908010.1109/20.799080 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.07.01410.1016/j.actamat.2004.07.014 ↗