A Multiobjective Design Optimization Procedure for Control of Structures Using Piezoelectric Materials
Source abstract
Abstract
Piezoelectric materials can be used as sensors and actuators for structures that re quire active vibration control and lack sufficient stiffness or passive damping. Efficient implementa tion of these actuators requires that their optimal locations on the structure be determined and that the structure be designed to best utilize the properties of the actuators. A formal optimization pro cedure has been developed to address both of these issues. A gradient based multiobjective optimiza tion technique is used to minimize multiple and conflicting design objectives associated with both the structure and the control system design which is also coupled with the actuator location problem. Objective functions such as the fundamental natural frequency of the structure and energy dissipated by the piezoelectric actuators are included in this study. Constraints are placed on the mass of the structure, displacements and applied voltage to the piezoelectric actuators. Design variables include parameters defining both the control system and the structure. The finite element method is used to model active damping elements which are piezoelectric actuators bonded to a box beam. The op timization procedure is implemented on a flexible 2-D frame.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Structural Analysis and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Arizona State University Tempe, AZ 85287
References (15)
Show source-provided references
1. Banks, H.T. · 1993
2. Banks, H.T., K. Ito and Y. Wang. 1992."Computational Methods for Identification and Feedback Control in Structures with Piezoceramic Actuators and Sensors", Proc. Conference on Recent Advances in Adaptive and Sensory Materials and Their Applications, C. A. Rogers and R. C. Rogers, eds. Blacksburg, VA: Technomic Pub., VPI & SU, April 27-29, pp. 111-119.
3. Chattopadhyay, A. · Structural Systems and Industrial Applications · 1991 · 451
4. 10.2514/3.979210.2514/3.9792 ↗
5. Dimitriadis, E.K., C.R. Fuller and C.A. Rogers. 1989. "Piezoelectric Actuators for Distributed Noise and Vibration Excitation of Thin Plates", Proc. 8th ASME Conference on Failure, Prevention, Reliability and Stress Analysis, Montreal, pp. 223-233.
6. 10.1177/1045389X920030010910.1177/1045389X9200300109 ↗
7. 10.1007/BF0174545910.1007/BF01745459 ↗
8. Gibbs, G.P. · 1991
9. 10.2514/3.2096910.2514/3.20969 ↗
10. Heeg, J. · 1991
11. Horner, G. and J. Walz. 1985. "A Design Methodology for Determining Actuator Gains in Spacecraft Vibration Control", Proc. 26th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Orlando, FL, April 15 -17, 1985, pp. 143-15110.2514/6.1985-628 ↗
12. Onoda, J. and Y. Hanawa. 1992. "Optimal Locations of Actuators for Statistical Static Shape Control of Large Space Structures: A Comparison of Approaches", Proc. 31st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Washington, DC April 13-15, 1992, pp. 2788-2795.
13. Piezo Systems Inc. · 1993
14. Sepulveda, A.E., I.M. Jin and L.A. Schmit, Jr. 1992. "Optimal Placement of Active Elements in Control Augmented Structural Synthesis", Proc. 31st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Washington, DC: April 13-15, 1992, 2768-2787
15. Vanderplaats, G.N. · NASA TMX · 1973