journal article·2025-07Open access

An experimental investigation on the interaction effect of cyclic loading parameters on the mechanical behavior of superelastic NiTi

Danial Davarnia, Shaohong Cheng, Niel Van Engelen

Abstract

Shape memory alloys (SMAs) are ideal for passive vibration control systems due to their energy dissipation capability under cyclic loading and exceptional superelasticity. Existing studies show that the mechanical properties of SMAs can vary significantly depending on the cyclic loading conditions. There is a complex interaction between the combined effect of cyclic loading parameters and internal variables that primarily governs the mechanical behavior of SMAs. While the effects of individual cyclic loading parameters on the mechanical behavior of SMAs have been widely studied, the interaction of these factors remains largely underexplored in the existing literature. The current study systematically explores the interaction of loading frequency, pre-strain, and strain amplitude on the mechanical response of superelastic NiTi, particularly in terms of energy dissipation, residual strain, and effective stiffness through an experimental approach that considers two of the parameters simultaneously. Moreover, theoretical rationalization for the observed SMA wire mechanical behavior resulted from complex interactions of different loading parameters have been offered, a dimension largely omitted in existing studies. This not only explains the inconsistent observations reported in literature, but also provides a predictive perception for SMA behavior beyond the tested parameter ranges.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1139/l07-03810.1139/l07-038 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.intermet.2017.03.00210.1016/j.intermet.2017.03.002 ↗
3. Billah AM, Rahman J, Zhang Q (2022) Shape memory alloys (SMAs) for resilient bridges: A state-of-the-art review. Structures 37: 514–527.
4. 10.1016/j.jmps.2004.01.00110.1016/j.jmps.2004.01.001 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.msea.2016.12.00310.1016/j.msea.2016.12.003 ↗
6. 10.1088/1361-665X/ace14310.1088/1361-665X/ace143 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.msea.2007.09.00610.1016/j.msea.2007.09.006 ↗
8. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:1(38)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:1(38) ↗
9. 10.1016/S0020-7403(01)00050-910.1016/S0020-7403(01)00050-9 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.04910.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.049 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.istruc.2023.10542510.1016/j.istruc.2023.105425 ↗
12. 10.1088/0964-1726/19/11/11501410.1088/0964-1726/19/11/115014 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2016.02.01110.1016/j.mechmat.2016.02.011 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2023.11238410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2023.112384 ↗
15. Kong X Zhang J Ding H et al. (2024) Combined effect of annealing temperature and pre-deformation on the superelastic behaviors of NiTi shape memory alloys. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-024-10077-6 (accessed 28 June 2024).10.1007/s11665-024-10077-6 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jcsr.2023.10844710.1016/j.jcsr.2023.108447 ↗
17. 10.1177/1045389X940050051410.1177/1045389X9400500514 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.istruc.2020.03.02810.1016/j.istruc.2020.03.028 ↗
19. 10.1115/1.220494710.1115/1.2204947 ↗
20. 10.1061/40889(201)410.1061/40889(201)4 ↗
21. 10.1007/BF0264444710.1007/BF02644447 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2011.05.00510.1016/j.ijplas.2011.05.005 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2005.07.00410.1016/j.mechmat.2005.07.004 ↗
24. 10.1088/1361-665X/ac3c0010.1088/1361-665X/ac3c00 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.00910.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.009 ↗
26. 10.1177/1045389X1036972010.1177/1045389X10369720 ↗
27. Ozbulut OE, Hurlebaus S, Desroches R (2011) Mechanical properties and constitutive models of shape memory alloy for structural engineering: A review. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 22(14): 2335–2359.
28. 10.1006/jsvi.1998.157810.1006/jsvi.1998.1578 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.istruc.2023.07.00210.1016/j.istruc.2023.07.002 ↗
30. 10.1088/0964-1726/16/1/02310.1088/0964-1726/16/1/023 ↗
31. 10.1088/1361-665X/aa981910.1088/1361-665X/aa9819 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13770010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137700 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.10434010.1016/j.jobe.2022.104340 ↗
34. 10.1007/s40830-022-00397-810.1007/s40830-022-00397-8 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.10868310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.108683 ↗
36. 10.1088/0964-1726/19/8/08500610.1088/0964-1726/19/8/085006 ↗
37. 10.1146/annurev.ms.18.080188.00032510.1146/annurev.ms.18.080188.000325 ↗
38. 10.1016/S0167-6636(98)00041-610.1016/S0167-6636(98)00041-6 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2020.10356510.1016/j.mechmat.2020.103565 ↗
40. 10.1177/1045389X980090020510.1177/1045389X9800900205 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.11282810.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112828 ↗
42. 10.1088/1755-1315/474/7/07205710.1088/1755-1315/474/7/072057 ↗
43. 10.1007/s11665-012-0395-910.1007/s11665-012-0395-9 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.10113710.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101137 ↗
45. 10.1080/17445302.2020.172664710.1080/17445302.2020.1726647 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jmps.2024.10578210.1016/j.jmps.2024.105782 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2010.08.00710.1016/j.ijmecsci.2010.08.007 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.jcsr.2024.10904510.1016/j.jcsr.2024.109045 ↗
49. 10.1002/stc.210610.1002/stc.2106 ↗
50. 10.1088/1361-665X/ad43cc10.1088/1361-665X/ad43cc ↗