journal article·2025-05

Design and performance study of displacement-driven piezoelectric energy harvesters used in steel spring floating slab tracks

Chengyun Du, Jianjun Wang, Yalei Cao, Hongjun Xiang, Junrui Liang, Xin Li, Deyun Ding, Teng Li, Lihua Tang

Publisher page

Abstract

The deflection of track structures, which represents an abundant source of mechanical energy in railway systems, holds potential for powering monitoring devices. In this study, a kind of displacement-driven piezoelectric energy harvester specifically for steel spring floating slab tracks is developed, which boasts high power output and two notable advantages: (a) Its compact design seamlessly integrates the force transmission metal tube and the piezoelectric stack within the compression spring, significantly reducing the overall height of the device. This makes it ideal for applications where space within track structures is limited. (b) The inverted design of the force transmission metal tube facilitates easy assembly with the high-stiffness compression spring. This design effectively transmits more mechanical vibration energy to the piezoelectric stacks, resulting in substantially greater electrical outputs. Energy harvesting performance of the proposed harvester, including AC voltage and power under the harmonic displacement, has been assessed both experimentally and theoretically. Effects of displacement input, piezoelectric stack parameters and spring stiffness on the performance of the harvester are discussed. In laboratory tests, the fabricated prototype can achieve the maximum average power of up to 942.55 mW at an optimal resistance of 11 kΩ, under a displacement of 4 mm, and a frequency of 5 Hz. Furthermore, when exposed to the floating slab displacement of steel spring floating slab tracks, the prototyped device was able to harvest a maximum energy of approximately 742 mJ at an optimal resistance of 76 kΩ, over 10 cycles of floating slab displacement signals. This translates to a total energy of 15.14 J per day, which is sufficient to power the ViPSN2.0 wireless temperature Internet of Things (IoT) sensor node. The findings of this study offer valuable design guidelines for the development of the displacement-driven piezoelectric energy harvesters in railway systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies · Vibration and Dynamic Analysis · Wireless Power Transfer Systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Applied Mechanics, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, China

Institute of Smart Materials and Structures, School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China

School of Information Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China

Advanced Manufacturing Technology Innovation Center, Guanzhou Institute of Technology, Xidian University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Beijing Jiuzhouyigui Environmental Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China

Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

Funding

the National Natural Science Foundation of China · a scholarship from the China Scholarship Council

References (62)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/00423114.2020.172697310.1080/00423114.2020.1726973 ↗
2. 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.000060810.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000608 ↗
3. 10.1088/1361-6463/aceb0110.1088/1361-6463/aceb01 ↗
4. 10.1177/1045389X22108565410.1177/1045389X221085654 ↗
5. C.U.R.T.A (2019) China urban rail transit annual statistical analysis report of 2018. Available at: https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/OwqvtZZ7dgau9Qnoj1FC0w
6. Ding D, Wang W, Ma M, et al. (2022) Experimental study on vibration and noise reduction performance of steel-spring floating slab track under different train speeds. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University 46(6): 144–151.
7. 10.1177/1045389X22114767210.1177/1045389X221147672 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.energy.2022.12427410.1016/j.energy.2022.124274 ↗
9. 10.1177/1045389X24129783710.1177/1045389X241297837 ↗
10. Du C, Wang J, Jin H, et al. (2024a) Influence of installation of piezoelectric stack energy harvesters placed at rail bottom on dynamic performance of a vehicle-track system. Journal of Vibration and Shock 43(12): 248–259.
11. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.11396910.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113969 ↗
12. Gao M, Wang P, Cao Y, et al. (2017) Design and verification of a rail-borne energy harvester for powering wireless sensor networks in the railway industry. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 18(6): 1–1609.
13. 10.1109/TITS.2017.270934610.1109/TITS.2017.2709346 ↗
14. 10.21595/jve.2016.1693810.21595/jve.2016.16938 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.01910.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.019 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.11998110.1016/j.jclepro.2020.119981 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12528310.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125283 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.11803710.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118037 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2018.06.01910.1016/j.mechatronics.2018.06.019 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.01.03210.1016/j.apenergy.2018.01.032 ↗
21. 10.1109/TIE.2013.227895410.1109/TIE.2013.2278954 ↗
22. 10.1177/1045389X21102638310.1177/1045389X211026383 ↗
23. 10.1177/1045389X1982851210.1177/1045389X19828512 ↗
24. 10.1109/JIOT.2020.301699310.1109/JIOT.2020.3016993 ↗
25. 10.1177/147592171878239510.1177/1475921718782395 ↗
26. 10.1177/095440971666855210.1177/0954409716668552 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.energy.2024.13363610.1016/j.energy.2024.133636 ↗
28. 10.3390/mi1404089210.3390/mi14040892 ↗
29. 10.1063/5.019149210.1063/5.0191492 ↗
30. 10.1117/12.77588410.1117/12.775884 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.05110.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.051 ↗
32. 10.1117/12.88063110.1117/12.880631 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.isci.2022.10384910.1016/j.isci.2022.103849 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.12316010.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123160 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.sna.2022.11398010.1016/j.sna.2022.113980 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.sna.2023.11452510.1016/j.sna.2023.114525 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.sna.2024.11545410.1016/j.sna.2024.115454 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.10926810.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109268 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.11858410.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118584 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11604010.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116040 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.11651210.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116512 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.enconman.2022.11544210.1016/j.enconman.2022.115442 ↗
43. 10.1109/MESA.2012.627553210.1109/MESA.2012.6275532 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.10632010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106320 ↗
45. 10.1177/1045389X1347918510.1177/1045389X13479185 ↗
46. 10.1088/0964-1726/24/10/10501710.1088/0964-1726/24/10/105017 ↗
47. 10.1088/1361-665X/ac31c510.1088/1361-665X/ac31c5 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.enconman.2021.11514610.1016/j.enconman.2021.115146 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.21010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.210 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.energy.2020.11955910.1016/j.energy.2020.119559 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.apm.2019.09.05110.1016/j.apm.2019.09.051 ↗
52. 10.1088/0964-1726/23/12/12504610.1088/0964-1726/23/12/125046 ↗
53. 10.1007/BF0332576110.1007/BF03325761 ↗
54. 10.1088/1361-6463/acc5f410.1088/1361-6463/acc5f4 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.04.06410.1016/j.apenergy.2017.04.064 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.04.01210.1016/j.enconman.2016.04.012 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.02.05410.1016/j.enconman.2018.02.054 ↗
58. 10.1088/1361-6463/ac9f2110.1088/1361-6463/ac9f21 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.sna.2014.04.01910.1016/j.sna.2014.04.019 ↗
60. 10.1631/jzus.A200004010.1631/jzus.A2000040 ↗
61. 10.1111/mice.1228510.1111/mice.12285 ↗
62. 10.1177/095440971667154910.1177/0954409716671549 ↗