journal article·2024-03Open access

Magnetostrictive energy conversion ability of Iron Cobalt Vanadium alloy sheet: Experimental and theoretical evaluation

Borel Franck Toutsop Zangho, Yuanyuan Liu, Shurui Zhang, Mickaël Lallart, Laurent Morel, Gael Sebald, Pierre Tsafack, Benjamin Ducharne

Abstract

The increasing demand for autonomous devices has made the concept of energy harvesting a significant industrial and academic point of interest. In this domain, an ideal magnetostrictive material for converting mechanical vibrations into electrical energy in a cost-effective way (i.e. competing with the price of primary batteries) remains to be determined. Iron-Cobalt-Vanadium (Permendur, Co49-Fe49-V2) is a promising candidate: it is a soft ferromagnetic material with high magnetization saturation, high magnetostrictive coefficients, low price, and good availability. In this study, the experimental magnetic characterization and simulation of Permendur sheets under tensile stress were performed, and their energy conversion capabilities were assessed. The conversion ability was predicted using thermodynamic Ericsson cycles from reconstructed anhysteretic curves. A maximum of 10.45 mJ cm −3 energy density was obtained under a tensile stress of 480 MPa and a magnetic excitation of 5.5 kA m −1 . Then, an additional estimation was proposed to account for the hysteresis losses. For this, major hysteresis loops at different stress levels were considered, yielding an energy density of 3.52 mJ cm −3 . Finally, experimental Ericsson cycles were performed to prove the feasibility of the conversion and corroborate the energy level predictions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Electric Motor Design and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Engineering and Technology, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon

Univ. Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, INSA Lyon, Ecole Centrale de Lyon, CNRS, Ampère, UMR5005, Villeurbanne, France

Univ Lyon, INSA-Lyon, LGEF EA682, Villeurbanne Cedex, France

Space Structure Lab, Department of Aerospace Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan

ELyTMaX IRL3757, CNRS, Univ. Lyon, INSA Lyon, Centrale Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan

Institute of Fluid Science (IFS), Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan

Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan

References (60)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1515/978311072670110.1515/9783110726701 ↗
2. 10.1088/0031-8949/54/5/01110.1088/0031-8949/54/5/011 ↗
3. 10.1109/TMAG.2020.301187510.1109/TMAG.2020.3011875 ↗
4. 10.1109/TMAG.2007.89353410.1109/TMAG.2007.893534 ↗
5. 10.1088/0964-1726/16/3/R0110.1088/0964-1726/16/3/R01 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2020.16661210.1016/j.jmmm.2020.166612 ↗
7. 10.1117/12.200981210.1117/12.2009812 ↗
8. 10.2320/matertrans.43.88110.2320/matertrans.43.881 ↗
9. 10.1177/1045389X1668544410.1177/1045389X16685444 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.sna.2009.10.00210.1016/j.sna.2009.10.002 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.sna.2010.12.02510.1016/j.sna.2010.12.025 ↗
12. 10.3390/ma1418516510.3390/ma14185165 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.306864610.1063/1.3068646 ↗
14. Dapino MJ · Encyclopedia of Smart Materials · 2002 · 2 · 600
15. 10.1177/1045389X0201301100510.1177/1045389X02013011005 ↗
16. 10.1109/TMAG.2011.216274410.1109/TMAG.2011.2162744 ↗
17. 10.1109/TMAG.2012.220003610.1109/TMAG.2012.2200036 ↗
18. Deng Z · 2015 · 9433 · 74
19. 10.1088/1361-665X/aa834710.1088/1361-665X/aa8347 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e0113510.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01135 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2020.16739510.1016/j.jmmm.2020.167395 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.mseb.2022.11565010.1016/j.mseb.2022.115650 ↗
23. Fiorillo F (2010) Magnetic materials for electrical applications: A review. Technical report, TR 13/2010, INRIM Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica.
24. 10.1116/1.504676210.1116/1.5046762 ↗
25. 10.1063/1.499420210.1063/1.4994202 ↗
26. Hubert A · 2008
27. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2011.01.04110.1016/j.jmmm.2011.01.041 ↗
28. 10.1109/TMAG.2013.228787510.1109/TMAG.2013.2287875 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.490723710.1063/1.4907237 ↗
30. 10.1109/MPRV.2005.2310.1109/MPRV.2005.23 ↗
31. 10.1088/0960-1317/22/9/09400910.1088/0960-1317/22/9/094009 ↗
32. 10.1063/5.002555010.1063/5.0025550 ↗
33. 10.3390/app1306347710.3390/app13063477 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2021.16881910.1016/j.jmmm.2021.168819 ↗
35. 10.1142/S2010135X1930001910.1142/S2010135X19300019 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.11.00310.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.11.003 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.08.08510.1016/j.jmmm.2018.08.085 ↗
38. 10.1063/1.36598310.1063/1.365983 ↗
39. 10.1063/1.486597610.1063/1.4865976 ↗
40. 10.1088/2053-1591/1/2/02550410.1088/2053-1591/1/2/025504 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2016.12.04010.1016/j.jmmm.2016.12.040 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.03.04010.1016/j.jmmm.2015.03.040 ↗
43. Rekik M · 2014
44. 10.3233/JAE-14179310.3233/JAE-141793 ↗
45. 10.5120/4915-748410.5120/4915-7484 ↗
46. 10.1080/14686996.2017.137759010.1080/14686996.2017.1377590 ↗
47. 10.1088/0964-1726/17/01/01501210.1088/0964-1726/17/01/015012 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.04610.1016/j.rser.2015.10.046 ↗
49. 10.1117/12.60487110.1117/12.604871 ↗
50. 10.3390/s2216629610.3390/s22166296 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.11998410.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119984 ↗
52. 10.1080/10584587.2019.157004210.1080/10584587.2019.1570042 ↗
53. 10.1088/0964-1726/17/4/04500910.1088/0964-1726/17/4/045009 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2020.16726010.1016/j.jmmm.2020.167260 ↗
55. 10.1177/1045389X1773091710.1177/1045389X17730917 ↗
56. 10.1109/ICAL.2012.630824010.1109/ICAL.2012.6308240 ↗
57. 10.1063/1.216513310.1063/1.2165133 ↗
58. 10.1109/TMAG.2012.219928910.1109/TMAG.2012.2199289 ↗
59. Zucca M · IEEE Transactions on Magnetics · 2014 · 50 · 1
60. 10.1109/TMAG.2014.235924810.1109/TMAG.2014.2359248 ↗