journal article·2009-01

An Experimental Investigation of Applying Mica2 Motes in Pavement Condition Monitoring

Jin-Song Pei, Richard A. Ivey, Hungjr Lin, Aaron R. Landrum, Colby J. Sandburg, Nadim A. Ferzli, Timothy King, Musharraf M. Zaman, Hazem H. Refai, Eric C. Mai

Publisher page

Abstract

Pavement maintenance is vital for travel safety, thus detecting dangerous road conditions in a real-time fashion is desirable. Using an off-the-shelf wireless sensor network to detect such conditions at a low cost poses many challenges. In order to meet these challenges, a Mica2 Mote sensor network is adopted in this study to process and transmit data collected from three external analog sensors. Consequentially, several hardware and software interfaces are developed to complete a pavement monitoring system that uses temperature and moisture presence to detect hazardous road conditions. Surge Time Synchronization is explored in this specific application to enable the wireless sensor network to operate in a low power consumption mode. A fairly simplistic pattern classification algorithm is embedded into the motes to create the smart wireless sensing application. A series of outdoor tests are conducted in this study paying special attention to the survivability of fragile analog sensors in harsh roadway conditions. In this regard, a novel solution called the ``Sensor-Road Button''(SRB) is developed and validated experimentally. This is one of several exercises made in this study to enable the application of sensor technologies in intelligent transportation systems (ITS). The size of the wireless sensor network in this study is relatively small, utilizing a total of five motes in order to fully exploit the transmitting range of each mote. Long testing periods (i.e., uninterrupted 12-hour time frames for each period of data collection) add an additional advantage, allowing for the evaluation of the selected wireless sensor network for long-term monitoring using the low power consumption mode under Surge Time Synchronization. Many performance metrics of the adopted small-size, large-interval Mica2 Motes wireless sensor network are revealed in this study through a series of data processing efforts. Results are presented to examine (i) inter-node connectivity and transmitting range, (ii) battery life, (iii) the length of the initial network connection time as affected by methods of setting up tests under practical conditions, (iv) error rate and analysis of different error types (showing the importance of the subsequent data cleansing step), and (v) other network routing properties including the parent time histories for each mote. The results and analysis form a database for future efforts to better understand, appreciate, and improve the performance of Mica2 Motes. This study will thus benefit robust real-world implementation of off-the-shelf sensor network products such as Mica2 Motes in terms of hardware development and data processing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Water Quality Monitoring Technologies · Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks · Analytical Chemistry and Sensors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Civil Engineering & Environmental Science, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019-1024, USA,

Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849-2912, USA

School of Civil Engineering & Environmental Science, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019-1024, USA

School of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019-1024, USA

College of Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019-1024, USA

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. Amphenol, R.F. · 2003
2. 10.1145/1023663.102369510.1145/1023663.1023695 ↗
3. 2006
4. Brewer, E. · 2004
5. Caffrey, J.
6. 10.1145/1062689.106274110.1145/1062689.1062741 ↗
7. 10.1117/12.48238710.1117/12.482387 ↗
8. Clayton, E.
9. Donoho. L. · Journal of New England Technology · 2003
10. Ferzli, N.A. · 2006
11. Ferzli, N.A.
12. Glaser. S.
13. 1999
14. Inc. Crossbow Technology. · 2006
15. Innovative Dynamics Inc.
16. Koushanfar F.
17. Kurata, N.
18. Leaf Wetness Sensor: Standard & Industrial Installation Manual. Davis Instruments, 2002. Product Number: 6420.
19. 10.1201/978142000306210.1201/9781420003062 ↗
20. Mark J.W. · 2003
21. Maurer. W. · 2003
22. 10.1002/047172061510.1002/0471720615 ↗
23. Mosalam, K.M. · 2002
24. NTC Thermistors, Accuracy Line. Vishay BCcomponents, 2322 640 3/4/ 6. Vishay, 2004. Document Number: 29049.
25. Paek, J. · 2005
26. 10.1109/IECON.2003.128061410.1109/IECON.2003.1280614 ↗
27. 10.1002/stc.20510.1002/stc.205 ↗
28. Pei, J.S. · 2007
29. QRD1113/1114 Reflective Object Sensor. Fairchild Seminconductor Corporation, 2000. Reference Number: 100030A.
30. Roadway Standard (English), Precast Median Barrier. Oklahoma Department of Transportation, 1999. Drawing Number: PMB-2.
31. Smart Dust Training, 2004. Crossbow Technologies Inc.
32. Shankar. P.M. · 2002
33. The weather Channel Interactive, Inc., 2006 www.weather.com
34. Traffic Buttons. 2005. Trantex Inc.
35. UC Berkeley, 2004. http://www.tinyos.net/
36. Vaisala DRS511/DRS511B Road &Runway Sensor. 2004a. Vaisala Inc. Vaisala ROSA Weather Station. 2004b. Vaisala Inc.
37. 2006
38. Xu, N.
39. Zhao, J.