Analysis of bimorph piezoelectric beam energy harvesters using superconvergent element
Source abstract
Abstract
Cantilever-based piezoelectric energy harvesters have been utilized as structures to extract mechanical energy from the ambient mechanical vibrations and transfer it into the electrical output. In this article, the performance of bimorph piezoelectric beam energy harvesters is investigated. The cantilever beam is modeled by using both Timoshenko and Euler–Bernoulli beam theories. The equations are discretized using the conventional finite element method and superconvergent element. Besides the high rate of convergence, easy switching between the above beam theories is enabled by such type of element. The current model is presented for a Timoshenko beam model, but it could as well be used for a Euler–Bernoulli beam model. In addition, voltage, current, and power frequency response functions for different ranges of load resistance varying from the short-circuit to open-circuit conditions are determined to reach the maximum values. Effects of the slenderness ratio and the required beam model based on the geometric properties of the piezoelectric energy harvesters are discussed in the final part of this study. The results show that only for smaller values of the slenderness ratio (below 5), it is necessary to model the beam using the Timoshenko assumptions; otherwise both beam theories provide approximately the same responses.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical, Industrial and Aerospace Engineering (MIAE), Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada
Funding
Concordia University · Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/1045389X0505315010.1177/1045389X05053150 ↗
2. 10.1007/s10832-006-6287-310.1007/s10832-006-6287-3 ↗
3. 10.1088/0964-1726/17/4/04300110.1088/0964-1726/17/4/043001 ↗
4. 10.1109/84.62311610.1109/84.623116 ↗
5. 10.1088/0964-1726/19/5/05501810.1088/0964-1726/19/5/055018 ↗
6. 10.1080/1058458059096457410.1080/10584580590964574 ↗
7. 10.1115/1.289040210.1115/1.2890402 ↗
8. 10.1177/1045389X0708563910.1177/1045389X07085639 ↗
9. 10.1088/0964-1726/18/2/02500910.1088/0964-1726/18/2/025009 ↗
10. 10.1002/978111999115110.1002/9781119991151 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2012.10.00910.1016/j.mechatronics.2012.10.009 ↗
12. 10.1007/s12541-011-0151-310.1007/s12541-011-0151-3 ↗
13. 10.1002/978047020972110.1002/9780470209721 ↗
14. Meirovitch L · 2010
15. 10.1109/TPEL.2002.80219410.1109/TPEL.2002.802194 ↗
16. Reddy JN · 2017
17. 10.1016/S0140-3664(02)00248-710.1016/S0140-3664(02)00248-7 ↗
18. 10.1177/058310240404327510.1177/0583102404043275 ↗
19. 10.1111/j.1475-1305.2004.00120.x10.1111/j.1475-1305.2004.00120.x ↗
20. Thomson W · 1996
21. 10.1177/1045389X1246108010.1177/1045389X12461080 ↗