journal article·2018-04

A simplified model for high-rate actuation of shape memory alloy torque tubes using induction heating

Robert N Saunders, James G Boyd, Darren J Hartl, Frederick T Calkins, Dimitris C Lagoudas

Publisher page

Abstract

Shape memory alloy actuators deliver high forces while being compact and reliable, making them ideal for consideration in aerospace applications. Induction heating of shape memory alloy actuators, specifically tubes that twist about the longitudinal axis, has recently been studied experimentally and computationally using finite element analysis. Reduced-order models for the torsional behavior of shape memory alloy tubes and induction heating of general metallic tubes exist, and thus, it is possible for these thermal and mechanical models to be combined and numerically solved. This work develops and implements an engineering model for inductively heated shape memory alloy tubes based on the reduction of the governing partial differential equations in space and time to an ordinary differential equation in time. An example solution is compared to finite element analysis results and agrees well. Finally, the ordinary differential equation is linearized and solved analytically. The linearized model agrees well with the nonlinear ordinary differential equation and finite element model.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Laser and Thermal Forming Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA

Boeing Research & Technology, Seattle, WA, USA

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0022-5096(96)00111-110.1016/S0022-5096(96)00111-1 ↗
2. Bertagne C, Hartl D, Cognata T (2015a) Analysis of highly coupled thermal-structural responses in morphing radiative bodies. Available at: https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.2015-151010.2514/6.2015-1510 ↗
3. Bertagne C · 2015 · 94312F
4. Bower A · 2011
5. 10.1016/S0749-6419(96)00030-710.1016/S0749-6419(96)00030-7 ↗
6. 10.1016/0020-7683(93)90113-L10.1016/0020-7683(93)90113-L ↗
7. 10.1007/BF0126269010.1007/BF01262690 ↗
8. 10.1007/BF0024952010.1007/BF00249520 ↗
9. Davies J · 1979
10. 10.1115/SMASIS2011-513210.1115/SMASIS2011-5132 ↗
11. 10.1243/09544100JAERO21110.1243/09544100JAERO211 ↗
12. 10.1088/0964-1726/18/10/10401710.1088/0964-1726/18/10/104017 ↗
13. 10.1002/9781118663547.ch12110.1002/9781118663547.ch121 ↗
14. 10.1088/0964-1726/20/9/09400610.1088/0964-1726/20/9/094006 ↗
15. 10.1117/12.91597210.1117/12.915972 ↗
16. Herrington J · 2015
17. 10.1088/0964-1726/9/5/31110.1088/0964-1726/9/5/311 ↗
18. 10.1177/1045389X0404279410.1177/1045389X04042794 ↗
19. Lagoudas D · 2008
20. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2005.08.00310.1016/j.mechmat.2005.08.003 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2011.10.00910.1016/j.ijplas.2011.10.009 ↗
22. 10.1115/IMECE2002-3343910.1115/IMECE2002-33439 ↗
23. 10.1007/978-3-319-03479-910.1007/978-3-319-03479-9 ↗
24. 10.1002/9781118663547.ch12210.1002/9781118663547.ch122 ↗
25. 10.1117/12.53900810.1117/12.539008 ↗
26. Maugin GA · 2013 · 33
27. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2010.06.00310.1016/j.mechmat.2010.06.003 ↗
28. Oehler S · 2012
29. Otsuka K · 1999
30. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2005.05.02710.1016/j.mechmat.2005.05.027 ↗
31. 10.1117/12.43655910.1117/12.436559 ↗
32. 10.1007/978-0-387-47685-8_410.1007/978-0-387-47685-8_4 ↗
33. 10.1201/978142002890410.1201/9781420028904 ↗
34. Sadiku M · 2014
35. 10.1177/1045389X0404279310.1177/1045389X04042793 ↗
36. 10.1088/0964-1726/25/4/04502210.1088/0964-1726/25/4/045022 ↗
37. 10.1115/SMASIS2014-764410.1115/SMASIS2014-7644 ↗
38. 10.1088/0964-1726/22/9/09400710.1088/0964-1726/22/9/094007 ↗
39. 10.1177/10453890140043801910.1177/104538901400438019 ↗
40. 10.1007/978-1-4613-9679-6_1110.1007/978-1-4613-9679-6_11 ↗
41. 10.1007/978-1-4612-2356-610.1007/978-1-4612-2356-6 ↗