Extending the dynamic range of an energy harvester with a variable load resistance
Source abstract
Abstract
In some energy harvesters, the maximum throw of the seismic mass is limited due to the physical constraints of the device. The shunt load resistance of such a harvester is generally selected based on the allowable throw of the mass when the device is subjected to the maximum level of excitation. However, the energy harvester with this value of shunt resistance does not perform well at lower levels of excitation. In this article, a variable load resistance, scheduled on the excitation level, is introduced to extend the dynamic range of an energy harvester in applications where excitation level varies. This method is applied to the design of an energy harvester, which comprises a sprung mass coupled to an electric motor through a lead screw. The dynamic equation and parameters of the system are introduced and the device is experimentally characterized, by conducting random vibration tests. The harvested power and the relative displacement are then obtained for different sinusoidal base excitation amplitudes when the system is excited at a frequency close to its natural frequency. It is demonstrated that the use of a variable load resistance mechanism can significantly improve the dynamic range and output power of the energy harvester.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies · Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1088/0964-1726/19/5/05500310.1088/0964-1726/19/5/055003 ↗
2. 10.1177/1045389X1142182410.1177/1045389X11421824 ↗
3. 10.1243/09544070JAUTO96810.1243/09544070JAUTO968 ↗
4. Drylin (2015) Drylin product catalog. Available at: www.igus.co.uk (accessed 20 March 2015).
5. 10.1016/j.jsv.2013.11.03610.1016/j.jsv.2013.11.036 ↗
6. Fylde Electronic Laboratories Ltd (2015) Available at: www.fylde.com (accessed 30 March 2015).
7. 10.1016/j.jsv.2013.09.03510.1016/j.jsv.2013.09.035 ↗
8. 10.1088/0964-1726/22/2/02300110.1088/0964-1726/22/2/023001 ↗
9. Hendijanizadeh M · 2014
10. 10.1115/1.402587710.1115/1.4025877 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.492817410.1063/1.4928174 ↗
12. 10.1088/0964-1726/22/12/12500910.1088/0964-1726/22/12/125009 ↗
13. 10.1109/TIE.2009.202465210.1109/TIE.2009.2024652 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.probengmech.2014.03.00710.1016/j.probengmech.2014.03.007 ↗
15. National Instruments (2015) Available at: www.uk.ni.com (accessed 30 March 2015).
16. 10.1016/j.enconman.2010.07.02410.1016/j.enconman.2010.07.024 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.19810.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.198 ↗
18. 10.1109/ICCEP.2011.603633810.1109/ICCEP.2011.6036338 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.enconman.2015.09.07110.1016/j.enconman.2015.09.071 ↗
20. Simeone L · 2014
21. 10.1016/j.jsv.2005.10.00310.1016/j.jsv.2005.10.003 ↗
22. Tang X · 2011 · 3134
23. 10.1016/j.mee.2015.02.03610.1016/j.mee.2015.02.036 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.28410.1016/j.rser.2015.12.284 ↗
25. 10.1177/1045389X1348670710.1177/1045389X13486707 ↗