Evolutionary optimization of transonic airfoils for static and dynamic trim performance
Source abstract
Abstract
The development and accelerated use of optimization frameworks in aircraft design is a testament to their ability to identify optimal and often non-intuitive shapes as a result of multi-disciplinary design objectives. Airfoil design is a continuously revised multi-disciplinary problem, and is pivotal to illustrate the performance of optimization frameworks involving numerical simulation, flexible shape parametrization, and intelligent evolutionary algorithms. An often overlooked component of this classic problem is to consider the dynamic aeroelastic behavior under trim conditions, which can generate explicit boundaries to the flight envelope. Trim introduces a significantly strong coupling with objectives governing static performance, e.g. aerodynamic and/or structural, thereby resulting in a highly nonlinear and discontinuous design space. In this paper, a multi-objective particle swarm optimization framework for multi-disciplinary performance improvement is presented, pertaining to aerodynamic, structural and aeroelastic design criteria at trim conditions. The framework is assisted by the construction of adaptive Kriging surrogates, which is cooperatively used with the numerical solver to identify optimal solutions within a computational constraint. Designer preferences are introduced to reflect the optimal compromise between the objectives. Results of the optimization process indicate a large spread in design variable influence and interaction, and a subtle yet clear distinction between all objectives is illustrated through the catalog of final airfoil candidates obtained.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms · Topology Optimization in Engineering · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Aerospace Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
LEAP Australia, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. Anderson J (2000) A survey of multiobjective optimization in engineering design. Technical Report LiTH-IKP-R-1097, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Linkping University, Linkping, Sweden.
2. 10.2514/6.1997-64310.2514/6.1997-643 ↗
3. ANSYS Academic Research, Release 16.2, Help System, Fluent Documentation, ANSYS, Inc.
4. 10.1177/1045389X1141408410.1177/1045389X11414084 ↗
5. 10.2514/6.1998-182110.2514/6.1998-1821 ↗
6. 10.2514/1.C00025610.2514/1.C000256 ↗
7. 10.1007/978-3-662-43505-2_6710.1007/978-3-662-43505-2_67 ↗
8. 10.2514/1.J05081910.2514/1.J050819 ↗
9. 10.1109/4235.98569210.1109/4235.985692 ↗
10. 10.1109/CEC.2000.87027210.1109/CEC.2000.870272 ↗
11. Coello Coello CA · 2007
12. 10.1177/1045389X1141495810.1177/1045389X11414958 ↗
13. Deb K · 2001
14. 10.1145/1143997.114411210.1145/1143997.1144112 ↗
15. 10.1007/1-84628-137-7_610.1007/1-84628-137-7_6 ↗
16. Detrick MS (2014) Utilization of optimization for design of morphing wing structures for enhanced flight. PhD Thesis , The Ohio State University.
17. Dietz G · 2004
18. 10.1007/978-3-319-09453-310.1007/978-3-319-09453-3 ↗
19. 10.2514/1.C03190310.2514/1.C031903 ↗
20. 10.2514/1.J05240610.2514/1.J052406 ↗
21. 10.1007/978-3-540-31880-4_510.1007/978-3-540-31880-4_5 ↗
22. 10.1109/TEVC.2005.85946310.1109/TEVC.2005.859463 ↗
23. Epstein B · AIAA Journal · 2007 · 3410 · 62
24. 10.2514/3.4598710.2514/3.45987 ↗
25. 10.1002/978047077080110.1002/9780470770801 ↗
26. 10.2514/2.86710.2514/2.867 ↗
27. 10.2514/3.6122610.2514/3.61226 ↗
28. 10.2514/3.785310.2514/3.7853 ↗
29. 10.1007/s00500-003-0328-510.1007/s00500-003-0328-5 ↗
30. 10.1016/B978-155860595-4/50003-610.1016/B978-155860595-4/50003-6 ↗
31. Knowles J · 2002 · 711
32. 10.2514/6.1994-432510.2514/6.1994-4325 ↗
33. 10.1007/s00158-002-0212-410.1007/s00158-002-0212-4 ↗
34. 10.2514/6.2008-705410.2514/6.2008-7054 ↗
35. 10.2514/1.1041510.2514/1.10415 ↗
36. Padula SL · 2000
37. 10.1109/CEC.2006.168841410.1109/CEC.2006.1688414 ↗
38. 10.2514/3.4681010.2514/3.46810 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.ast.2007.04.00410.1016/j.ast.2007.04.004 ↗
40. 10.1002/978111853474810.1002/9781118534748 ↗
41. 10.1007/s10898-004-6733-110.1007/s10898-004-6733-1 ↗
42. Sobieczky H · Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics · 1998 · 68 · 71
43. 10.1007/BF0119755410.1007/BF01197554 ↗
44. Spalart PR · La Recherche Aerospatiale · 1994 · 1 · 5
45. 10.2514/6.2014-229810.2514/6.2014-2298 ↗
46. Timme S, Badcock KJ (2009) Searching for transonic aeroelastic instability using an aerodynamic model hierarchy. Technical Report Deliverable D2.3, University of Liverpool, UK.
47. Wakayama S · Journal of Aircraft · 1995 · 44 · 1060
48. 10.1109/CEC.2010.558622110.1109/CEC.2010.5586221 ↗
49. 10.1145/1389095.138923710.1145/1389095.1389237 ↗
50. 10.1145/1569901.156999310.1145/1569901.1569993 ↗
51. 10.1162/10636560056820210.1162/106365600568202 ↗