journal article·2015-05

Investigation on a new Fe 83 Ga 17 wire–based magnetoelastic resonance biosensor

Shengbo Sang, Peng Cheng, Wendong Zhang, Pengwei Li, Jie Hu, Gang Li, Aoqun Jian

Publisher page

Abstract

Iron–gallium alloy, as an emerging class of magnetoelastic material, has attracted a great deal of attention due to its excellent mechanical and magnetostriction properties. This article proposes a magnetoelastic biosensor involving the Fe 83 Ga 17 wire. The resonant frequency and S 11 magnitude responses for the different length Fe 83 Ga 17 wires were tested. Furthermore, the response characteristics were improved by optimizing the coil parameters, for example, wire diameter, turn number, and tube diameter. In addition, the annealing treatment to the Fe 83 Ga 17 can also enhance the response characteristics. Finally, the Fe 83 Ga 17 wire–based biosensor was used to measure the ethanol concentration and has good linearity.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties and Applications · Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

MicroNano System Research Center, College of Information Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, P.R. China

Key Laboratory of Advanced Transducers and Intelligent Control System, Ministry of Education, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, P.R. China

Department of Applied Physics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, P.R. China

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1117/12.200981210.1117/12.2009812 ↗
2. 10.1039/b004929h10.1039/b004929h ↗
3. 10.1016/S0925-4005(01)00766-310.1016/S0925-4005(01)00766-3 ↗
4. 10.1021/ac049851610.1021/ac0498516 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.305868510.1063/1.3058685 ↗
6. Datta S · 2009
7. 10.1557/PROC-0888-V04-0910.1557/PROC-0888-V04-09 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2010.01.04610.1016/j.jmmm.2010.01.046 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.185383810.1063/1.1853838 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2012.10.00210.1016/j.jmmm.2012.10.002 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.sna.2006.09.00210.1016/j.sna.2006.09.002 ↗
12. 10.1088/0960-1317/20/7/07504010.1088/0960-1317/20/7/075040 ↗
13. 10.3390/s11030280910.3390/s110302809 ↗
14. 10.1117/12.66013210.1117/12.660132 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.msec.2007.04.00610.1016/j.msec.2007.04.006 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.bios.2008.09.00610.1016/j.bios.2008.09.006 ↗
17. 10.1088/0964-1726/9/4/31410.1088/0964-1726/9/4/314 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.mimet.2007.07.01210.1016/j.mimet.2007.07.012 ↗
19. Li S · 2007
20. 10.1016/j.snb.2009.01.03810.1016/j.snb.2009.01.038 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.intermet.2012.03.03010.1016/j.intermet.2012.03.030 ↗
22. 10.1021/ac900857210.1021/ac9008572 ↗
23. 10.3103/S106836661101009010.3103/S1068366611010090 ↗
24. 10.1088/0964-1726/22/12/12502610.1088/0964-1726/22/12/125026 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.snb.2008.03.00910.1016/j.snb.2008.03.009 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.snb.2012.10.08410.1016/j.snb.2012.10.084 ↗
27. 10.1117/12.77657610.1117/12.776576 ↗
28. 10.1088/0964-1726/18/9/09500210.1088/0964-1726/18/9/095002 ↗
29. Pickering GJ · American Journal of Enology and Viticulture · 1998 · 49 · 30610.5344/ajev.1998.49.3.306 ↗
30. 10.1166/sl.2004.04110.1166/sl.2004.041 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.bios.2004.01.00510.1016/j.bios.2004.01.005 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.bios.2004.03.00310.1016/j.bios.2004.03.003 ↗
33. 10.1109/JSEN.2011.216774710.1109/JSEN.2011.2167747 ↗
34. 10.1088/0022-3727/43/1/01500410.1088/0022-3727/43/1/015004 ↗
35. 10.1016/S0924-4247(99)00288-510.1016/S0924-4247(99)00288-5 ↗
36. 10.1007/s10853-014-8156-910.1007/s10853-014-8156-9 ↗
37. 10.3233/JAE-2008-96810.3233/JAE-2008-968 ↗
38. 10.1109/TMAG.2008.200241310.1109/TMAG.2008.2002413 ↗
39. 10.1063/1.282858710.1063/1.2828587 ↗
40. 10.1109/TMAG.2006.88640210.1109/TMAG.2006.886402 ↗
41. 10.1088/0960-1317/23/2/02501010.1088/0960-1317/23/2/025010 ↗
42. Walker TW · 2011
43. 10.1016/j.bios.2008.03.04110.1016/j.bios.2008.03.041 ↗
44. 10.1109/TMAG.2012.219947910.1109/TMAG.2012.2199479 ↗
45. 10.1117/12.59997310.1117/12.599973 ↗