Deformation of a Beam with Partially Debonded Piezoelectric Actuators
Source abstract
Abstract
A linear and a non-linear mathematical models for analyzing the deformation behavior of a beam with a pair of partially debonded piezoelectric actuators are developed on the basis of the Timoshenko beam theory. Effect of buckling is considered in the linear model, where the debonded actuator region is assumed to generate the Euler buckling load when the axial force in the region is larger than the load. The static behavior of the beam is investigated for extension and bending deformation. When the actuator debonds from its edge, the performance deteriorates; in contrast, the debonding in the middle of the actuator does not show any performance degradation until the debonded region buckles. The deformation behavior obtained from the linear model has been found to have good agreement with that from the non-linear model. The non-linear analysis shows that after the buckling the debonded actuator region maintains an axial force of the order of the Euler buckling load of a fix—fix column for the extending actuation, although for the bending actuation, it retains nearly 75% of the Euler buckling load. Further, the strain distribution in the debonded region shows that the buckling may occur before cracks begin in the actuator.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Structural Analysis and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Nagoya University, Chikusa, Nagoya, Japan,
Structures Division, National Aerospace Laboratories, Bangalore, India
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Nagoya University, Chikusa, Nagoya, Japan
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.2514/3.979210.2514/3.9792 ↗
2. 10.1177/1045389X920030010910.1177/1045389X9200300109 ↗
3. 10.2514/3.2804810.2514/3.28048 ↗
4. 10.1016/0045-7949(94)90267-410.1016/0045-7949(94)90267-4 ↗
5. 10.1016/0022-460X(91)90762-910.1016/0022-460X(91)90762-9 ↗
6. Kardomateas, G.A. · ’’ International Journal of Solids and Structures · 1995 · 43 · 847
7. 10.1115/1.289200810.1115/1.2892008 ↗
8. 10.1088/0964-1726/8/5/31810.1088/0964-1726/8/5/318 ↗
9. 10.1117/12.34977310.1117/12.349773 ↗
10. Russell, W.T. · ’’ Journal of Applied Mechanics · 1953 · 20 · 34910.1115/1.4010704 ↗
11. Seeley, C.E.
12. 10.1088/0964-1726/7/4/01010.1088/0964-1726/7/4/010 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0020-7683(96)00018-210.1016/S0020-7683(96)00018-2 ↗
14. 10.1016/0020-7683(91)90218-510.1016/0020-7683(91)90218-5 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0020-7683(97)00058-910.1016/S0020-7683(97)00058-9 ↗
16. 10.2514/2.186310.2514/2.1863 ↗
17. 10.2514/3.2804710.2514/3.28047 ↗
18. Timoshenko, S. · 1936
19. Timoshenko, S. · 1940
20. 10.1088/0964-1726/10/4/31510.1088/0964-1726/10/4/315 ↗
21. 10.1143/JJAP.35.326710.1143/JJAP.35.3267 ↗
22. 10.1007/BF0117083910.1007/BF01170839 ↗
23. Zienkiewicz, O.C. 1971. The Finte Element Method in Engineering Science, pp. 370-377, McGraw-Hill, London.