Probabilistic modelling of a rotational energy harvester
Source abstract
Abstract
Relatively recently, many researchers in the field of energy harvesting have focused on the concept of harvesting electrical energy from relatively large-amplitude, low-frequency vibrations (such as the movement caused by walking motion or ocean waves). This has led to the development of ‘rotational energy harvesters’ which, through the use of a rack-and-pinion or a ball-screw, are able to convert low-frequency translational motion into high-frequency rotational motion. A disadvantage of many rotational energy harvesters is that, as a result of friction effects in the motion transfer mechanism, they can exhibit large parasitic losses. This results in nonlinear behaviour, which can be difficult to predict using physical-law-based models. In the current article a rotational energy harvester is built and, through using experimental data in combination with a Bayesian approach to system identification, is modelled in a probabilistic manner. It is then shown that the model can be used to make predictions which are both accurate and robust against modelling uncertainties.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies · Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK; Institute for Risk and Uncertainty, University of Liverpool, UK
ISVR, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.renene.2007.01.00810.1016/j.renene.2007.01.008 ↗
2. Brown P · OCEANS 2006 – Asia Pacific · 2007 · 1
3. 10.1177/1045389X1142182410.1177/1045389X11421824 ↗
4. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2007)133:7(816)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2007)133:7(816) ↗
5. 10.1243/09544070JAUTO96810.1243/09544070JAUTO968 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jsv.2010.04.00210.1016/j.jsv.2010.04.002 ↗
7. Doob JL · 1953
8. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2014.10.00310.1016/j.ymssp.2014.10.003 ↗
9. 10.1177/1045389X1247337910.1177/1045389X12473379 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jsv.2012.04.03510.1016/j.jsv.2012.04.035 ↗
11. Hendijanizadeh M (2014) Design and optimisation of constrained electromagnetic energy harvesting devices. (PhD thesis) The University of Southampton.
12. 10.1115/1.402587710.1115/1.4025877 ↗
13. 10.1088/0964-1726/22/12/12500910.1088/0964-1726/22/12/125009 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jsv.2013.09.03610.1016/j.jsv.2013.09.036 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.343655310.1063/1.3436553 ↗
16. 10.1109/TVT.2012.222930810.1109/TVT.2012.2229308 ↗
17. Matsuoka T · 2002 · 581
18. 10.1063/1.169911410.1063/1.1699114 ↗
19. 10.1177/107754630707940010.1177/1077546307079400 ↗
20. 10.1115/1.302312010.1115/1.3023120 ↗
21. 10.1177/1045389X1243788610.1177/1045389X12437886 ↗
22. Papatheou E · SPIE smart structures and materials, nondestructive evaluation and health monitoring · 2012
23. 10.1088/0964-1726/20/5/05500710.1088/0964-1726/20/5/055007 ↗
24. 10.1126/science.111106310.1126/science.1111063 ↗
25. Simeone L · 2014
26. 10.1016/j.jsv.2013.03.01910.1016/j.jsv.2013.03.019 ↗