Analysis and Testing of Electrorheological Bypass Dampers
Source abstract
Abstract
We experimentally validate nonlinear quasi-steady electrorheological (ER) and magnetorheological (MR) damper models, using an idealized Bingham plastic shear flow mechanism, for the flow mode of damper operation. An electrorheological valve or bypass damper was designed, and fabricated using predominantly commercial off-the-shelf hydraulic components. Both the hydraulic cylinder and the bypass duct have cylindrical geometry, and damping forces are developed in the annular bypass via Poiseuille (flow mode) flow. Damper models assume parallel plate geometry. Three nondimensional groups are used for damper analysis, namely, the Bingham number, Bi, the nondimensional plug thickness, 6, and the area coefficient defined as the ratio of the piston head area, AP, to the cross-sectional area of the annular bypass, Ad. In the flow mode case, the damping coefficient, which is defined as the ratio of equivalent viscous damping of the Bingham plastic material, Ceq, to the Newtonian viscous damping, C, is a function only of the nondimensional plug thickness. The damper was tested using a mechanical damper dynamometer for sinusoidal stroke of 2 in., over a range of frequencies below 0.63 Hz. The damping coefficient vs. nondimensional plug thickness diagram was experimentally validated using these data over a range of damper shaft velocities or frequencies and applied electric fields. Because the behavior of ER and MR fluids are qualitatively similar, these ER damper modeling results can be extended to analysis of flow mode MR dampers.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids · Seismic Performance and Analysis · Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Smart Structures Laboratory, Alfred Gessow Rotorcraft Center, Dept. of Aerospace Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1122/1.55024110.1122/1.550241 ↗
2. Bayer AFG · 1997
3. 10.1142/S021797929200138910.1142/S0217979292001389 ↗
4. Dixon, J. C. · 1999
5. 10.4271/88113410.4271/881134 ↗
6. Ervin, R. D. · 1996
7. 10.4050/JAHS.32.4510.4050/JAHS.32.45 ↗
8. 10.1115/1.282334810.1115/1.2823348 ↗
9. 10.1115/1.282334910.1115/1.2823349 ↗
10. 10.1088/0964-1726/5/5/00710.1088/0964-1726/5/5/007 ↗
11. 10.1088/0964-1726/6/3/01210.1088/0964-1726/6/3/012 ↗
12. 10.1520/STP11759S10.1520/STP11759S ↗
13. 10.2514/2.416710.2514/2.4167 ↗
14. 10.4050/JAHS.44.23410.4050/JAHS.44.234 ↗
15. 10.2514/2.10010.2514/2.100 ↗
16. Leek, T. H. · 1994 · 609
17. Leek, T. H. · 1994 · 625
18. 10.4271/93140310.4271/931403 ↗
19. Lou, Z. · Electro-Rheological Flows · 1993 · 164 · 143
20. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1996)122:10(1003)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1996)122:10(1003) ↗
21. McGuire, D. P.
22. Panda B.
23. 10.1142/S021797929400124X10.1142/S021797929400124X ↗
24. Phillips, R. W. (1969). Engineering Applications of Fluids with a Variable Yield Stress, Ph.D. Thesis, Mechanical Engineering, U. California at Berkeley.
25. Prager, W. · 1961
26. 10.1088/0964-1726/5/4/01110.1088/0964-1726/5/4/011 ↗
27. 10.1088/0964-1726/7/5/01510.1088/0964-1726/7/5/015 ↗