A transformer model for detection of stiffener disbonding in stiffened aluminium panel using Lamb wave
Source abstract
Abstract
Stiffened panels are widely used in a range of engineering domains to enhance load-bearing capacity, reduce buckling, and improve overall structural integrity. Stiffener disbonding is a common failure mode, making it essential to detect these disbonds before they reach a critical level that could lead to structural failure. In this work, a transformer architecture has been implemented to detect the presence and extent of disbonding between the stiffener and the host aluminium plate. The research uses a dataset of Lamb waves obtained from an experimental setup with four types of specimens, ranging from no disbonding to disbonding of varying widths induced by Teflon strips. The problem is framed as a multi-class classification task with labels representing different disbonding levels. The transformer model utilizes a self-attention mechanism to analyze the Lamb wave responses and ascertain the presence and extent of disbanding. Operating in encoder-only mode, the tailored transformer accepts Lamb wave responses as input and outputs a class probability score for each of the four predefined disbonding levels using a softmax activation function. The developed model has been able to predict the state of the stiffened panels with an accuracy of 100%. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the transformer model, it has been compared to the convolutional neural network (CNN) model. When tested on an unseen noisy dataset, the transformer model achieved an accuracy of 100%, outperforming the CNN model, which achieved an accuracy of 89%.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, West Bengal, India
References (58)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/s2010277810.3390/s20102778 ↗
2. 10.1088/1361-665X/ac3a9710.1088/1361-665X/ac3a97 ↗
3. 10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.0100710.1109/ICCV48922.2021.01007 ↗
4. 10.1088/0964-1726/22/10/10502610.1088/0964-1726/22/10/105026 ↗
5. 10.1177/1475921721100712710.1177/14759217211007127 ↗
6. Devlin J Chang MW Lee K et al. (2018) Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805.
7. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.10861610.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108616 ↗
8. 10.1109/ICASSP.2018.846250610.1109/ICASSP.2018.8462506 ↗
9. Dosovitskiy A Beyer L Kolesnikov A et al. (2020) An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11929.
10. 10.1007/s11831-020-09471-910.1007/s11831-020-09471-9 ↗
11. 10.3390/s2103086010.3390/s21030860 ↗
12. Haviv A Ram O Press O et al. (2022) Transformer language models without positional encodings still learn positional information. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.16634.10.18653/v1/2022.findings-emnlp.99 ↗
13. Kazemnejad A, Padhi I, Natesan Ramamurthy K, et al. (2023) The impact of positional encoding on length generalization in transformers. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36: 24892–24928.
14. Li S, Jin X, Xuan Y, et al. (2019a) Enhancing the locality and breaking the memory bottleneck of transformer on time series forecasting. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32.
15. 10.1088/1361-665X/ab58d610.1088/1361-665X/ab58d6 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ultras.2020.10606210.1016/j.ultras.2020.106062 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.sigpro.2019.03.01910.1016/j.sigpro.2019.03.019 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.10871810.1016/j.measurement.2020.108718 ↗
19. 10.1177/1045389X0708878210.1177/1045389X07088782 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.07.04010.1016/j.ymssp.2018.07.040 ↗
21. 10.3390/app601001210.3390/app6010012 ↗
22. Melville J, Alguri KS, Deemer C, et al. (2018) Structural damage detection using deep learning of ultrasonic guided waves. AIP Conference Proceedings1949: 230004.
23. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.09.06710.1016/j.compstruct.2017.09.067 ↗
24. 10.1007/978-3-030-64594-6_6110.1007/978-3-030-64594-6_61 ↗
25. 10.1088/0964-1726/25/5/05300110.1088/0964-1726/25/5/053001 ↗
26. 10.1177/147592171881716910.1177/1475921718817169 ↗
27. 10.1007/s13349-017-0252-510.1007/s13349-017-0252-5 ↗
28. 10.7763/IJMLC.2015.V5.52610.7763/IJMLC.2015.V5.526 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.08.02410.1016/j.compstruct.2018.08.024 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.10822010.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108220 ↗
31. 10.1007/s41403-022-00342-210.1007/s41403-022-00342-2 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.pacs.2020.10022610.1016/j.pacs.2020.100226 ↗
33. 10.1177/058310240607542810.1177/0583102406075428 ↗
34. 10.1088/1361-665X/abdd0010.1088/1361-665X/abdd00 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ultras.2010.12.01410.1016/j.ultras.2010.12.014 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.11418910.1016/j.eswa.2020.114189 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.11.00810.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.11.008 ↗
38. 10.1177/147592172094283610.1177/1475921720942836 ↗
39. Staszewski W (2005) Ultrasonic/guided waves for structural health monitoring. In: Key Engineering Materials, vol. 293. Trans Tech Publ, pp.49–62.
40. 10.1109/JSEN.2019.290883810.1109/JSEN.2019.2908838 ↗
41. Tuli S Casale G Jennings NR (2022) Tranad: Deep transformer networks for anomaly detection in multivariate time series data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.07284.10.14778/3514061.3514067 ↗
42. Vaswani A Shazeer N Parmar N et al. (2017) Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems30.
43. Vaswani A Shazeer N Parmar N et al. (2023) Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems30.
44. Wang Q Li B Xiao T et al. (2019) ‘Learning deep transformer models for machine translation’ arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.01787 .10.18653/v1/P19-1176 ↗
45. Wu H, Xu J, Wang J, et al. (2021a) Autoformer: Decomposition transformers with auto-correlation for long-term series forecasting. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34: 22419–22430.
46. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11459010.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114590 ↗
47. Xu J Wu H Wang J et al. (2021) Anomaly transformer: Time series anomaly detection with association discrepancy. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.02642.
48. Yang CHH, Tsai YY, Chen PY (2021) Voice2series: Reprogramming acoustic models for time series classification. In: International conference on machine learning, PMLR, pp.11808–11819.
49. 10.1016/j.ultras.2023.10701410.1016/j.ultras.2023.107014 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.apacoust.2014.10.01010.1016/j.apacoust.2014.10.010 ↗
51. Ye X, Jin T, Yun C (2019) A review on deep learning-based structural health monitoring of civil infrastructures. Smart Structures and Systems 24(5): 567–585.
52. 10.1177/147592171880413210.1177/1475921718804132 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.tws.2015.07.02710.1016/j.tws.2015.07.027 ↗
54. 10.1145/3447548.346740110.1145/3447548.3467401 ↗
55. 10.1145/367695510.1145/3676955 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11113710.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111137 ↗
57. Zhou T, Ma Z, Wen Q, et al. (2022) Fedformer: Frequency enhanced decomposed transformer for long-term series forecasting. In: International conference on machine learning, PMLR, pp.27268–27286.
58. 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.319944310.1109/ACCESS.2022.3199443 ↗