Behavior of energy harvesting from vibrations using simply supported beam piezoelectric transducers: A theoretical and experimental study
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper explores the application of simply supported beam (SSB) piezoelectric transducer for capturing mechanical energy from road vibrations and converting it into electrical energy. A theoretical model incorporating loss impedance and material damping is established to predict the transducer’s piezoelectric performance, with its accuracy subsequently verified through test results. The research examines the relationship between output performance and various influencing factors, including piezoelectric material characteristics, load amplitude, frequency, and the number of transducers. The findings indicate that the SSB piezoelectric strain constant only affects the open-circuit voltage without influencing the piezoelectric impedance. Increasing damping and elasticity reduce the conversion efficiency of SSB transducer, whereas output power exhibits a positive correlation with both load amplitude and frequency. The number of transducers in parallel connection plays a crucial role in piezoelectric performance. An optimal SSB transducer configuration is suggested considering variations in load magnitude and frequency. These findings provide valuable insights for the design and optimization of piezoelectric energy harvesters in road vibration applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, China
College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
State Power Economic Research Institute, Jinan, Shandong, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.02110.1016/j.rser.2016.10.021 ↗
2. 10.1109/TNNLS.2019.290513710.1109/TNNLS.2019.2905137 ↗
3. 10.1115/1.402960610.1115/1.4029606 ↗
4. 10.1115/1.403343310.1115/1.4033433 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.07510.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.075 ↗
6. 10.2514/2.156110.2514/2.1561 ↗
7. 10.3390/mi1407142810.3390/mi14071428 ↗
8. Gao LN, Ding SQ, She JJ (2023) Research status of piezoelectric technology application in intelligent road. Science Technology and Engineering 23(27): 11486–11495.
9. 10.1016/j.measurement.2023.11389210.1016/j.measurement.2023.113892 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.10868610.1016/j.soildyn.2024.108686 ↗
11. 10.3390/s2309423810.3390/s23094238 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.12210.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.122 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.04010.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.040 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.489116910.1063/1.4891169 ↗
15. 10.1007/s12541-011-0151-310.1007/s12541-011-0151-3 ↗
16. 10.1143/JJAP.43.617810.1143/JJAP.43.6178 ↗
17. 10.1088/0964-1726/19/4/04502310.1088/0964-1726/19/4/045023 ↗
18. 10.1088/0964-1726/25/8/08504010.1088/0964-1726/25/8/085040 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.18310.1016/j.rser.2017.05.183 ↗
20. 10.1088/0964-1726/16/2/02610.1088/0964-1726/16/2/026 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.04.04010.1016/j.apenergy.2019.04.040 ↗
22. Takei R, Makimoto N, Okada H, et al. (2016) Design of piezoelectric MEMS cantilever for low-frequency vibration energy harvester. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 55: 06GP14.
23. 10.1177/1045389X1987339210.1177/1045389X19873392 ↗
24. 10.3390/en1601015710.3390/en16010157 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.energy.2024.13281210.1016/j.energy.2024.132812 ↗
26. 10.3390/buildings1108035610.3390/buildings11080356 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.energy.2021.12068510.1016/j.energy.2021.120685 ↗
28. 10.1088/1361-665X/ac51ad10.1088/1361-665X/ac51ad ↗
29. 10.1088/0964-1726/24/10/10501710.1088/0964-1726/24/10/105017 ↗
30. 10.1007/s42417-022-00445-810.1007/s42417-022-00445-8 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2022.10082010.1016/j.trgeo.2022.100820 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.12037910.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120379 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.11257110.1016/j.enconman.2020.112571 ↗
34. 10.1115/1.402655510.1115/1.4026555 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.04.03110.1016/j.apenergy.2016.04.031 ↗
36. 10.1155/2018/301274310.1155/2018/3012743 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ijprt.2017.08.00610.1016/j.ijprt.2017.08.006 ↗
38. 10.3390/s2309431210.3390/s23094312 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.03.00910.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.03.009 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.10513510.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.105135 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.12311310.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123113 ↗
42. 10.1088/0964-1726/24/2/02502310.1088/0964-1726/24/2/025023 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ijprt.2017.08.00110.1016/j.ijprt.2017.08.001 ↗