journal article·2023-03

Equivalent modeling for a finite element analysis of the mechanical properties of a bolted joint with a superelastic shape memory alloy

Xingkun Dong, Xiangjun Jiang, Yanping Wang, Peng Li, Fengqun Pan

Publisher page

Abstract

In this study, a beam element model with tension–compression asymmetry is constructed by using the improved Brinson model. A comparison between the calculated and experimental results verifies the computational effectiveness of the beam element. Then, a new mechanical property analysis model of a shape memory alloy (SMA) bolted joint based on the beam element model is proposed. Combined with a constructed convergence function, the mechanical equilibrium state of the SMA bolted joint under preload and external load is solved iteratively by the bisection method. Consequently, the stress–strain response curve of the SMA bolt rod and the root of the first thread, the deformation law of each thread and the separation conditions of the contact surface of members are analyzed by the proposed model. It is shown that the new proposed method can greatly improve the calculation efficiency with high calculation precision compared with the traditional calculation method.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Key Laboratory of Electronic Equipment Structural Design, Xidian University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, People’s Republic of China

Medical College, Xi’an International University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, People’s Republic of China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2020.10425510.1016/j.ijpvp.2020.104255 ↗
2. Bettini P · 2021 · 561
3. 10.1177/1045389X930040021310.1177/1045389X9300400213 ↗
4. 10.1088/1361-665X/ab1ce610.1088/1361-665X/ab1ce6 ↗
5. 10.1111/j.1475-1305.2009.00679.x10.1111/j.1475-1305.2009.00679.x ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.11.00810.1016/j.jcsr.2013.11.008 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.06710.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.067 ↗
8. 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000212710.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002127 ↗
9. Ghamari A · 2020 · 1
10. 10.1177/1045389X980090050510.1177/1045389X9800900505 ↗
11. 10.1155/2021/199614210.1155/2021/1996142 ↗
12. 10.1177/1045389X2097445310.1177/1045389X20974453 ↗
13. 10.1007/978-3-319-67462-910.1007/978-3-319-67462-9 ↗
14. 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.000179810.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001798 ↗
15. 10.3390/ma1109159210.3390/ma11091592 ↗
16. 10.1177/168781401984113710.1177/1687814019841137 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.04.00510.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.04.005 ↗
18. 10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.000034810.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000348 ↗
19. 10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.000050310.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000503 ↗
20. 10.1142/S021987621240022110.1142/S0219876212400221 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.09.00710.1016/j.matdes.2014.09.007 ↗
22. 10.1007/s11340-015-0016-210.1007/s11340-015-0016-2 ↗
23. 10.1115/1.343904310.1115/1.3439043 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2021.10453010.1016/j.ijpvp.2021.104530 ↗
25. 10.1115/1.400021210.1115/1.4000212 ↗
26. 10.1177/1045389X1351218710.1177/1045389X13512187 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.11.00210.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.11.002 ↗
28. Shoji Y · 2002
29. Toghroli A · Steel and Composite Structures: An International Journal · 2020 · 36 · 213
30. 10.1016/j.jcsr.2019.07.01110.1016/j.jcsr.2019.07.011 ↗
31. 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000167510.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001675 ↗
32. 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.000162910.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001629 ↗
33. 10.1177/168781401558847710.1177/1687814015588477 ↗
34. 10.1177/1045389X2096316710.1177/1045389X20963167 ↗
35. Zhou CY · 2014 · 900 · 78