Flexible tactile sensing of magnetic hydrogel composites based on electrical impedance tomography
Source abstract
Abstract
Flexible and stretchable tactile sensors show promising applications in robotics, prosthetics, and wearable electronics. This paper demonstrates an electrical impedance tomography (EIT) based highly flexible, touch-sensitive pressure sensor using magnetic hydrogels. EIT technology has been explored for continuous distributed strain sensing and tactile imaging. Magnetic hydrogel composites are synthesized by simultaneous polymerization and crosslinking of acrylamide with magnetic carbonyl iron particles (CIPs). The effects of CIPs percentage on morphology, sensitivity, and electrical/mechanical properties is investigated. EIT accurately discerns pressure quantity, shape, and spatial distribution. Lower CIPs volume fractions (3%) exhibit maximum sensitivity to strain fields. Mechanical testing show the hydrogels have excellent fatigue resistance, ideal for repeated compression loading. The results demonstrate the potential of EIT with magnetic hydrogel composites for tactile sensing and imaging, with applications in soft robotics, prosthetics, and wearable electronics. The tunable sensitivity and multifunctionality make these soft composites promising materials for flexible electronics.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography · Tactile and Sensory Interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China
Institute of Intelligent Machines, Hefei Institute of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, China
Funding
the National Key R&D Program of China · special key project of technological innovation and application development in Chongqing
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1088/0967-3334/28/7/S0110.1088/0967-3334/28/7/S01 ↗
2. 10.1088/0967-3334/27/5/S0310.1088/0967-3334/27/5/S03 ↗
3. 10.1039/C8TC01153B10.1039/C8TC01153B ↗
4. 10.1002/adma.20130334910.1002/adma.201303349 ↗
5. 10.1177/1045389X2097550010.1177/1045389X20975500 ↗
6. 10.1002/ima.185002020310.1002/ima.1850020203 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsaelm.2c0139410.1021/acsaelm.2c01394 ↗
8. 10.1109/JSEN.2021.310398810.1109/JSEN.2021.3103988 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.apm.2017.02.02710.1016/j.apm.2017.02.027 ↗
10. 10.1088/0964-1726/25/4/04LT0110.1088/0964-1726/25/4/04LT01 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsami.9b1710010.1021/acsami.9b17100 ↗
12. 10.1038/ncomms413210.1038/ncomms4132 ↗
13. 10.1007/s11051-021-05333-y10.1007/s11051-021-05333-y ↗
14. 10.1201/978142003446210.1201/9781420034462 ↗
15. 10.1109/ICSENS.2007.438851910.1109/ICSENS.2007.4388519 ↗
16. 10.1038/nmat297110.1038/nmat2971 ↗
17. 10.1038/ncomms674710.1038/ncomms6747 ↗
18. Lee H, Kwon D, Cho H, et al. (2017) Soft nanocomposite based multi-point, multi-directional strain mapping sensor using anisotropic electrical impedance tomography. Scientific Reports 7(1): 1–10
19. 10.1109/JMEMS.2015.241809510.1109/JMEMS.2015.2418095 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsaelm.1c0048810.1021/acsaelm.1c00488 ↗
21. Lu Y, Qu X, Zhao W, et al. (2020) Highly stretchable, elastic, and sensitive mxene-based hydrogel for flexible strain and pressure sensors. Research 2020: 1–13.
22. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0006310.1021/acs.nanolett.8b00063 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsami.6b0783310.1021/acsami.6b07833 ↗
24. 10.1126/sciadv.170001510.1126/sciadv.1700015 ↗
25. 10.3390/s1709199910.3390/s17091999 ↗
26. 10.1126/sciadv.160220010.1126/sciadv.1602200 ↗
27. 10.1109/JSEN.2014.237534610.1109/JSEN.2014.2375346 ↗
28. 10.1002/adma.20140344110.1002/adma.201403441 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.08.02910.1016/j.carbon.2015.08.029 ↗
30. MATLAB (2022) The MathWorks Inc. MATLAB version: 9.13.0 (R2022b) Natick MA. https://www.math-works.com
31. 10.1038/nn.297310.1038/nn.2973 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.06.00610.1016/j.carbon.2017.06.006 ↗
33. 10.1088/0957-0233/13/1/31410.1088/0957-0233/13/1/314 ↗
34. 10.1039/C9TB02570G10.1039/C9TB02570G ↗
35. 10.1016/j.mtphys.2017.06.00210.1016/j.mtphys.2017.06.002 ↗
36. 10.1038/nmat375510.1038/nmat3755 ↗
37. 10.1126/sciadv.150070110.1126/sciadv.1500701 ↗
38. 10.1109/JSEN.2015.250754010.1109/JSEN.2015.2507540 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.04.09610.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.04.096 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.mser.2017.02.00110.1016/j.mser.2017.02.001 ↗
41. 10.1038/ncomms726910.1038/ncomms7269 ↗
42. 10.1039/C8MH01188E10.1039/C8MH01188E ↗
43. 10.3390/mi812035610.3390/mi8120356 ↗