journal article·2023-05

Fatigue Stress Concentration Factor Reduction via Metal Additive Manufacturing

A. Menghini, A. Kanyilmaz, F. Berto

Strength of Materials· Volume 55· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

This paper examines the potential of using additive manufacturing (AM) technology to create nature-inspired designs with decreased stress concentration factors, which are typically the source of fatigue damage. AM has advantages over conventional manufacturing processes, allowing for creation of complex and optimized geometries. Based on a real case study, this paper evaluates the possibility of bio-inspired optimization of a connection between a tubular profile and a steel plate through AM technology. The results reveal a significant decrease in the stress concentration factor for the optimized bio-inspired AM solution compared to traditional construction solutions.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · Design Education and Practice

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. F. Berto and J. Razavi, “Fatigueless structures inspired by nature: A case study,” Material Design & Processing Communications, 1, No. 3, e27 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/mdp2.2710.1002/mdp2.27 ↗
2. D. Taylor, “Fatigue-resistant components: What can we learn from nature?” P I Mech Eng C-J Mec, 229, No. 7, 186–1193 (2015).10.1177/0954406214530881 ↗
3. B. Kumar and K. P. Singh, “Fatigueless response of spider draglines in cyclic torsion facilitated by reversible molecular deformation,” Appl Phys Lett, 105, No. 21, 213704 (2014).
4. A. Kanyilmaz, F. Berto, I. Paoletti, et al., “Nature-inspired optimization of tubular joints for metal 3D printing,” Struct Multidisc Optim, 63, 767–787 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-020-02729-710.1007/s00158-020-02729-7 ↗
5. F. Ludwig and D. Schönle, Growing Architecture. How to Design and Build with Trees, Birkhäuser (2023).10.1515/9783035603392 ↗
6. M. Chierici, F. Berto, A. Kanyilmaz, and C. A. Castiglioni, “Life cycle inventory analysis for resourceefficient structural steel nodes: Metal 3D printing or traditional manufacturing?” in: M. F. Hveisel and P. J. Cruz (Eds.), Structures and Architecture a Viable Urban Perspective? CRC Press (2022), pp. 1187–1194.10.1201/9781003023555-142 ↗
7. A. Kanyilmaz, A. G. Demir, M. Chierici, et al., “Role of metal 3D printing to increase quality and resource-efficiency in the construction sector,” Additive Manufacturing, 50, 102541 (2021).10.1016/j.addma.2021.102541 ↗
8. M. Chierici, F. Berto, and A. Kanyilmaz, “Resource‐efficient joint fabrication by welding metal 3D‐printed parts to conventional steel: A structural integrity study,” Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct, 44, No. 5, 1271–1291 (2021).10.1111/ffe.13428 ↗
9. E. Ghafoori, H. Dahaghin, C. Diao, et al., “Fatigue strengthening of damaged steel members using wire arc additive manufacturing,” Eng Struct, 284, 115911 (2023).10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115911 ↗
10. X. Guo, P. Kyvelou, J. Ye, et al., “Experimental study of DED-arc additively manufactured steel double-lap shear bolted connections,” Eng Struct, 281, 115736 (2023).10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115736 ↗
11. A. Crosato, D. Colombo, M. Motta, et al., “Integrated Robot Motion and Process Control for manufacturing reshaping,” in: Proc. of 2022 I-RIM Conference (Oct. 13–14, 2022, Milan, Italy). 10.5281/zenodo.7531242
12. A. Menghini, J. Leander, and C.A. Castiglioni, “A local response function approach for the stress investigation of a centenarian steel railway bridge,” Eng Struct, 286, 116116 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.11611610.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116116 ↗
13. BS 7608, Guide to Fatigue Design and Assessment of Steel Products (2015).
14. P. Lazzarin and F. Berto, “Some expressions for the strain energy in a finite volume surrounding the root of blunt V-notches,” Int J Fracture, 135, 161–185 (2005).10.1007/s10704-005-3943-6 ↗
15. P. Lazzarin, F. Berto, and M. Zappalorto, “Rapid calculations of notch stress intensity factors based on averaged strain energy density from coarse meshes: Theoretical bases and applications,” Int J Fatigue, 32, No. 10, 1559–1567 (2010).10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.02.017 ↗
16. M. Chierici, Additively Manufactured Steel Nodes for Optimizing Performance and Material Efficiency in Steel Structures, Ph.D. Thesis (2023).
17. M. Chierici, A.G. Demir, A. Kanyilmaz, et al., “Hybrid manufacturing of steel construction parts via arc welding of LPBF-produced and hot-rolled stainless steels,” Prog Addit Manuf (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-023-00466-z10.1007/s40964-023-00466-z ↗
18. CEN-EN 1993-1-9:2005, Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures – Part 1–9: Fatigue.