Optimal control for soft-landing in elevator emergency crash using multiple magnetorheological shock absorbers
Source abstract
Abstract
Protecting the occupants from surviving the casualties and severe injuries in elevator emergency crashes is always essential. This paper aims to explore the feasibility of using multiple magnetorheological shock absorbers (M-MRSAs) to attain the soft landing of a full-load elevator under impact velocities ranging up to 32 m/s. The resistance forces of MRSA with a bi-fold structure are predicted by evaluating the pressure drops using a nonlinear Bingham-plastic model considering the effects of minor loss. The optimal control for an M-MRSAs system achieving robustness concerning different mass loadings and impact velocities is investigated by formulating a multi-objective problem to minimize the induced peak acceleration with constrained time duration. The results demonstrate that the self-adapting MR yield force provides a smooth operation by minimizing the cycles of re-crash and rebound without incurring an end-stop impact. Furthermore, a plateau behavior of acceleration-displacement profiles is realized to effectively reduce the load transmission from overshoot accelerating force to the protected occupants and eliminate the injury risk.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids · Elevator Systems and Control · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Key Laboratory of Urban Rail Transit Intelligent Operation and Maintenance Technology & Equipment of Zhejiang Province, College of Engineering, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, China
College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · National Key Research and Development Program of China
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/1045389X1984400910.1177/1045389X19844009 ↗
2. 10.1109/28.13746310.1109/28.137463 ↗
3. 10.4050/JAHS.61.03200610.4050/JAHS.61.032006 ↗
4. Coltman JW, Ingen CV, Johnson NB, et al. (1989) Aircraft crash survival design guide. Volume II. Aircraft design crash impact conditions and human tolerance. USAAVSCOM TR 89-D-22B. Phoenix, AZ: Simula, Inc.
5. 10.1039/c0sm01221a10.1039/c0sm01221a ↗
6. Eiband AH (1959) Hunlan tolerance to rapidly applied accelerations: A summary of the literature. NASA Memorandum 5-19-59E, NASA, Washington, DC.
7. 10.1088/1361-665X/aa56f410.1088/1361-665X/aa56f4 ↗
8. 10.1088/1361-665X/ac067310.1088/1361-665X/ac0673 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.08.04910.1016/j.compositesb.2018.08.049 ↗
10. 10.2514/1.C00022610.2514/1.C000226 ↗
11. 10.1088/1361-665X/aad93210.1088/1361-665X/aad932 ↗
12. 10.1088/0964-1726/21/10/10500310.1088/0964-1726/21/10/105003 ↗
13. 10.1177/1045389X0708313110.1177/1045389X07083131 ↗
14. 10.1088/0964-1726/22/11/11501510.1088/0964-1726/22/11/115015 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.amc.2009.03.03710.1016/j.amc.2009.03.037 ↗
16. 10.1136/bmj.286.6377.155710.1136/bmj.286.6377.1557 ↗
17. 10.1088/0964-1726/18/1/01501310.1088/0964-1726/18/1/015013 ↗
18. 10.1177/1045389X1347615310.1177/1045389X13476153 ↗
19. 10.1088/0964-1726/13/6/00410.1088/0964-1726/13/6/004 ↗
20. 10.1088/1361-665X/aab86010.1088/1361-665X/aab860 ↗
21. 10.1088/1361-665X/aadb3310.1088/1361-665X/aadb33 ↗
22. Shanahan DF · 2004
23. 10.12691/ajme-7-3-110.12691/ajme-7-3-1 ↗
24. 10.1088/1361-665X/aae6a010.1088/1361-665X/aae6a0 ↗
25. 10.1088/1361-665X/ab1ad110.1088/1361-665X/ab1ad1 ↗
26. 10.1088/0964-1726/22/12/12200110.1088/0964-1726/22/12/122001 ↗
27. 10.1088/0964-1726/23/5/05500910.1088/0964-1726/23/5/055009 ↗
28. 10.2514/1.C03291010.2514/1.C032910 ↗
29. 10.1088/0964-1726/7/5/01510.1088/0964-1726/7/5/015 ↗
30. 10.1088/0964-1726/24/10/10502410.1088/0964-1726/24/10/105024 ↗
31. 10.1177/095440621664310910.1177/0954406216643109 ↗
32. 10.1177/1045389X1560090210.1177/1045389X15600902 ↗