journal article·2020-11

A computational study on the effect of bending number on superelastic behavior of NiTi for medical application

Fardin Nematzadeh

Publisher page

Abstract

NiTi self-expanding stents can be exploited in medical applications such as thoracic aortic aneurysm owing to its effects on minimizing problems such as low twistability, unsuitable dynamic performance, and inadequate radial mechanical strength. The present simulation models NiTi superelasticity based on the thermodynamics of the Helmholtz free energy (Auricchio theory) and the thermodynamics of the Gibbs free energy (Lagoudas theory). The three-dimensional nonlinear finite element method is used to evaluate the influences of bend number on the superelastic manners of new geometries designed for Z-shaped thoracic aortic aneurysm NiTi stents by the use of a radial strain (crimping) test. NiTi stents with the lowest number of bends and highest segment length showed the best mechanical performance owing to their lower chronic outward force, higher radial resistive force, and whole superelastic behavior. This numerical study can provide a suitable way of assessing the biomechanical properties of thoracic aortic aneurysm stents given the effects of geometrical parameters.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Elasticity and Material Modeling · Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Arak University, Arak, Iran

References (59)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2017.06.02610.1016/j.medengphy.2017.06.026 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.09.01710.1016/j.medengphy.2014.09.017 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.04.00210.1016/j.commatsci.2014.04.002 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2009.12.00310.1016/j.ijplas.2009.12.003 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0045-7825(96)01147-410.1016/S0045-7825(96)01147-4 ↗
6. 10.1007/s11665-009-9409-710.1007/s11665-009-9409-7 ↗
7. Auricchio F · Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences · 2010 · 57 · 225
8. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.03.01210.1016/j.matdes.2013.03.012 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0749-6419(96)00030-710.1016/S0749-6419(96)00030-7 ↗
10. Canic S · Texas Heart Institute Journal · 2005 · 32 · 502
11. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.11941410.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119414 ↗
12. 10.1007/s11665-009-9408-810.1007/s11665-009-9408-8 ↗
13. 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2009.12.00210.1053/j.semtcvs.2009.12.002 ↗
14. 10.1080/1364570000916965410.1080/13645700009169654 ↗
15. 10.1002/jbm.b.34557.10.1002/jbm.b.34557. ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ijchv.2014.04.00710.1016/j.ijchv.2014.04.007 ↗
17. 10.3233/BME-17171410.3233/BME-171714 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.02.00610.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.02.006 ↗
19. Gideon V · Trends in Biomaterials and Artificial Organs · 2009 · 23 · 16
20. Gong X, Duerig T, Pelton A, et al. (2003) Finite element analysis and experimental evaluation of superelastic Nitinol stent. In: Proceedings of the international conference on shape memory and superelastic technologies. Available at: https://www.asminternational.org/home/-/journal_content/56/10192/CP2003SMST453/PUBLICATION
21. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.02.02610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.02.026 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.11.091.10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.11.091. ↗
23. 10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00385-810.1016/S1359-6454(01)00385-8 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.05.03210.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.05.032 ↗
25. Koop K · Progress in Biomedical Research · 2001 · 6 · 237
26. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.08.22510.1016/j.ijcard.2016.08.225 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2019.07.01710.1016/j.medengphy.2019.07.017 ↗
28. 10.1007/s11517-008-0361-810.1007/s11517-008-0361-8 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.11.01910.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.11.019 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.matchar.2007.02.00710.1016/j.matchar.2007.02.007 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.matdes.2008.10.02310.1016/j.matdes.2008.10.023 ↗
32. 10.1016/0020-7683(95)00082-810.1016/0020-7683(95)00082-8 ↗
33. 10.1007/s10439-018-1990-110.1007/s10439-018-1990-1 ↗
34. 10.1177/15266028030100010610.1177/152660280301000106 ↗
35. 10.1007/s10237-004-0039-610.1007/s10237-004-0039-6 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.scient.2012.10.02410.1016/j.scient.2012.10.024 ↗
37. 10.1007/s11665-013-0635-710.1007/s11665-013-0635-7 ↗
38. 10.1097/00004424-200109000-0000410.1097/00004424-200109000-00004 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.09.01410.1016/j.medengphy.2014.09.014 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2007.08.00110.1016/j.jmbbm.2007.08.001 ↗
41. 10.1115/1.193420310.1115/1.1934203 ↗
42. 10.1179/02670830322500194810.1179/026708303225001948 ↗
43. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(20000228)47:6<1123::AID-NME817>3.0.CO;2-N10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(20000228)47:6<1123::AID-NME817>3.0.CO;2-N ↗
44. Rebelo N · 2001 · 143 · 421
45. 10.1177/1045389X1988002110.1177/1045389X19880021 ↗
46. 10.1007/s13239-010-0023-510.1007/s13239-010-0023-5 ↗
47. Santillo M · 2008
48. 10.1007/978-3-319-02913-9_9010.1007/978-3-319-02913-9_90 ↗
49. Silber G · International Journal of Energy and Technology · 2010 · 2 · 1
50. 10.1007/s00330-003-2022-510.1007/s00330-003-2022-5 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.11.03610.1016/j.matdes.2009.11.036 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.04.06510.1016/j.matdes.2011.04.065 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.09.01810.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.09.018 ↗
54. 10.1115/1.178265010.1115/1.1782650 ↗
55. 10.1115/1.178291210.1115/1.1782912 ↗
56. 10.1177/1045389X1668544210.1177/1045389X16685442 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.02.02410.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.02.024 ↗
58. 10.1142/S021951941950038610.1142/S0219519419500386 ↗
59. 10.1007/s12598-019-01250-110.1007/s12598-019-01250-1 ↗