journal article·2011-03-16

Material strengthening by crack and cavity healing

V. P. Sylovanyuk, R. Ya. Yukhim

Publisher page

Abstract

The δ c -model of a crack-containing elastoplastic body was used to specify parameters that influence the healing of crack-type defects by filling them with the other material. The relationships are derived, which can predict the extent of crack-containing body strength recovery with various fillings. The “characteristic distance” of crack (filled or free) growth is established, when the intensity of external loads reaches its limit. It is shown that this distance is the constant of the material for unfilled macrocracks and constitutes a certain portion of the plastic zone formed near the defect.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Numerical methods in engineering

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (13)

Show source-provided references
1. V. V. Panasyuk, Quasi-Brittle Fracture Mechanics of Materials [in Russian], Naukova Dumka, Kiev (1991).
2. V. V. Panasyuk, M. M. Stadnik, and V. P. Silovanyuk, Stress Concentrations in Three-Dimensional Bodies with Thin Inclusions [in Russian], Naukova Dumka, Kiev (1986).
3. O. E. Andriikiv and I. M. Pan’ko, “Generalized model of a crack-containing elastoplastic body,” Fiz.-Khim. Mekh. Mater., No. 6, 73–80 (1995).
4. V. V. Panasyuk, M. P. Savruk, and A. P. Datsyshin, Stress Distributions near Cracks in Plates and Shells [in Russian], Naukova Dumka, Kiev (1976).
5. N. I. Muskhelishvili, Some Basic Problems of the Mathematical Theory of Elasticity [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1966).
6. J. R. Rice, “Mathematical analysis in the mechanics of fracture,” in: H. Liebowitz (Ed.), Fracture, Vol. II, Ch. 3: Mathematical Fundamentals, Academic Press, New York (1968), pp. 191–311.
7. F. A. McClintock and G. R. Irwin, “Plasticity aspects of fracture mechanics,” in: Fracture Toughness Testing and Its Applications, ASTM STP 381 (1964), pp. 84–113.
8. J. Malkin and A. S. Tetelman, “Relation between KIc and microscopic strength for low-alloy steels,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 3, 151–167 (1971).10.1016/0013-7944(71)90006-3 ↗
9. E. Orowan, “Brittle fracture of notched specimens,” Rep. Progr. Phys., 12, No. 11, 185–199 (1948).
10. H. Neuber, “Über die berücksichtigung der Spannungskonzentration bei Festigkeitsberechnungen,” Konstruktion, 20, 245–251 (1968).
11. G. S. Pisarenko and A. J. Krasowsky, “Analysis of kinetics of quasi-brittle fracture of cristalline materials,” Proc. Int. Conf. on Mechanical Behavior of Materials (Kyoto, 1971), (1972), 1, pp. 421–432.
12. H. Kotilainen, “The micromechanisms of cleavage fracture and their relationship to fracture toughness in a bainitic low-alloy steel,” in: TRCF Mat. Proc. Tech. Publ. ESPOO, 23 (1980).
13. D. Taylor, “Predicting the fracture strength of ceramic materials using the theory of critical distances,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 71, 2407–2416 (2004).10.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.01.002 ↗