A probabilistic hybrid sensor fusion and optimization approach for aircraft composite components
Source abstract
Abstract
An integrated sensor system that continuously monitors the structural integrity of an aircraft’s critical composite components can have a high payoff by reducing risks, costs, inspections, and unscheduled maintenance, while increasing safety. Hybrid sensor networks combine or fuse different types of sensors. Optimal sensor fusion tries to find the optimal number and location of different types of sensors such that their combined probability of detection is maximized. Optimal hybrid sensor networks can be more robust, more accurate, and/or cheaper than networks consisting only of homogeneous sensors. A generic sensor fusion approach that combines the probabilities of detection of heterogeneous sensors is described. A fast greedy optimization approach that provides approximate solutions is described and demonstrated. Computable lower and upper bounds of a probability of detection objective function were determined. Fiber Bragg grating sensors can be inserted in layers of composite structures to provide local damage detection, while surface-mounted piezoelectric lead zirconate titanate sensors can provide global damage detection for the host structure under consideration. The generic approach is demonstrated on such combinations of fiber Bragg grating and lead zirconate titanate sensor networks. It is demonstrated that the proposed approach can be used to answer structural health monitoring network design problems such as the following: (1) Given a number of sensors, what is the maximum probability of detection that the sensors can attain and where should they be positioned to provide the maximum probability of detection? (2) If a given probability of detection is desired, the minimum number, types, and locations of sensors that are needed to attain this probability of detection can be determined. The approach is generic, that is, it can be extended to any number or types of sensors for which probabilities of detection can be defined.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Advanced Sensor Technologies Research · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
United Technologies Research Center, East Hartford, CT, USA
US Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, USA
Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation, Stratford, CT, USA
Army Aviation Applied Technology Directorate (Army-AATD), VA, USA
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S1468-6996(02)00016-510.1016/S1468-6996(02)00016-5 ↗
2. Baker A · 2004
3. 10.1117/12.71409710.1117/12.714097 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.inffus.2005.07.00310.1016/j.inffus.2005.07.003 ↗
5. 10.1177/1045389X1141422510.1177/1045389X11414225 ↗
6. Butler SL · 2010
7. Butler SL · 2011
8. 10.1117/12.88202510.1117/12.882025 ↗
9. Chang FK · Transaction of the ASME · 2007 · 129 · 71810.1115/1.2409988 ↗
10. COCONUT Project (2012) Algorithms for solving nonlinear constrained optimization problems: the state of the art. Available at: http://www.mat.univie.ac.at/∼neum/glopt/coconut/
11. Costiner S · 2011
12. 10.1088/0964-1726/12/5/01710.1088/0964-1726/12/5/017 ↗
13. 10.1007/BF0119770810.1007/BF01197708 ↗
14. 10.1093/oso/9780195100563.001.000110.1093/oso/9780195100563.001.0001 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2009.09.00310.1016/j.ymssp.2009.09.003 ↗
16. Flynn EB, Todd MD (2010b) Bayesian probabilistic structural modeling for optimal sensor placement in ultrasonic guided wave-based structural health monitoring. Proceedings of SPIE (The International Society for Optical Engineering) 7648, San Diego, CA, 07 March 2010. Available at: http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=75822410.1117/12.847744 ↗
17. 10.1088/0964-1726/10/4/30410.1088/0964-1726/10/4/304 ↗
18. 10.1106/9V39-ETJU-DNMG-TJUF10.1106/9V39-ETJU-DNMG-TJUF ↗
19. 10.1016/j.microrel.2010.01.03710.1016/j.microrel.2010.01.037 ↗
20. Ghoshal A · 2010
21. 10.1007/978-1-4615-2025-210.1007/978-1-4615-2025-2 ↗
22. 10.1177/073168440403970310.1177/0731684404039703 ↗
23. Kusaka T · 2003 · 1539
24. 10.1088/0964-1726/16/2/01910.1088/0964-1726/16/2/019 ↗
25. 10.1117/12.71523810.1117/12.715238 ↗
26. 10.1109/JSEN.2009.201933910.1109/JSEN.2009.2019339 ↗
27. 10.1364/OL.14.00082310.1364/OL.14.000823 ↗
28. Nemhauser GL · 1989
29. Padula SL · Optimization strategies for sensor and actuator placement · 1999
30. 10.1106/RL3E-EBU4-YT7Y-0RUM10.1106/RL3E-EBU4-YT7Y-0RUM ↗
31. Pinter J · 2010
32. 10.1016/S1359-8368(99)00034-710.1016/S1359-8368(99)00034-7 ↗
33. Sidek O · 2011
34. 10.1080/0305215060055784110.1080/03052150600557841 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2004.10.01010.1016/j.ymssp.2004.10.010 ↗
36. 10.1117/12.848910.10.1117/12.848910. ↗