Optimization of the shaping function of a tapered piezoelectric energy harvester using tabu continuous ant colony system
Source abstract
Abstract
During the past years, the development of piezoelectric energy harvesters is extensively increased for providing the required energy of sensor nodes. It has been proven that changing the beam’s cross-section along its length direction may lead to extract more power with less mass. In this article, a hybrid metaheuristic algorithm called tabu continuous ant colony system is employed to optimize the tapered piezoelectric energy harvester in a fast and course manner. The exponential and fourth-order polynomial functions are considered as shaping functions for tapering the beam’s width along its length direction. An experiment is also set up to evaluate the performance of the optimization algorithm for the case of exponential shaping function. Finally, the algorithm is applied to optimize the voltage and power per mass of both shaping functions of the tapered piezoelectric energy harvester at the specified excitation frequency.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies · Energy Harvesting in Wireless Networks · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Afshari SS · Structural Control and Health Monitoring · 2018 · 25
2. 10.1177/107754630403336510.1177/1077546304033365 ↗
3. 10.12989/sss.2016.18.2.24910.12989/sss.2016.18.2.249 ↗
4. 10.2514/6.2005-561710.2514/6.2005-5617 ↗
5. 10.1007/s00542-009-1000-510.1007/s00542-009-1000-5 ↗
6. De Godoy TC, Trindade MA, Deü JF (2014) Topological optimization of piezoelectric energy harvesting devices for improved electromechanical efficiency and frequency range. In: 10th world congress on computational mechanics, pp. 4003–4016. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ecb7/07f397a74736792d8cb894abd37b012907cb.pdf10.5151/meceng-wccm2012-19664 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jsv.2009.05.01510.1016/j.jsv.2009.05.015 ↗
8. 10.1177/1045389X1036509410.1177/1045389X10365094 ↗
9. 10.1115/1.289040210.1115/1.2890402 ↗
10. 10.1088/0964-1726/18/2/02500910.1088/0964-1726/18/2/025009 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.procir.2014.07.15210.1016/j.procir.2014.07.152 ↗
12. 10.1080/15376494.2014.94992510.1080/15376494.2014.949925 ↗
13. Lai Y, Senesky DG, Pisano AP (2010) Genetic algorithm optimization for MEMS cantilevered piezoelectric energy harvesters. In: Proceedings of PowerMEMS, pp. 111–114. Available at: http://cap.ee.ic.ac.uk/∼pdm97/powermems/2010/poster-pdfs/111_Lai_189.pdf
14. 10.1088/0964-1726/23/9/09503710.1088/0964-1726/23/9/095037 ↗
15. 10.1177/1045389X0505528010.1177/1045389X05055280 ↗
16. 10.1088/0964-1726/22/7/07501510.1088/0964-1726/22/7/075015 ↗
17. 10.1109/ULTSYM.2016.772878610.1109/ULTSYM.2016.7728786 ↗
18. 10.1177/1045389X1350287410.1177/1045389X13502874 ↗
19. 10.1007/s12206-011-0910-110.1007/s12206-011-0910-1 ↗
20. 10.1155/2014/93050310.1155/2014/930503 ↗
21. 10.1115/1.403993210.1115/1.4039932 ↗
22. 10.1155/2015/42687610.1155/2015/426876 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.06.08410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.06.084 ↗
24. 10.1007/s00542-015-2605-510.1007/s00542-015-2605-5 ↗
25. 10.1007/s00419-012-0637-110.1007/s00419-012-0637-1 ↗
26. 10.1115/1.400583510.1115/1.4005835 ↗